Yes- you questioned my conclusion to my type. Coming to a conclusion about one's type is
in the sense that this quality, this quality, and this quality interact to make you this type.
is also used in typing someone such as looking at consistent and enduring behaviors, actions, and beliefs of a person in order to type someone. However, regarding the use of
in typing someone, you obviously could not have had enough information about me, and my past in order to come to a conclusion about my type through it. All you had going for it were my posts which are a lousy indicator of type if you ask me. Also, if you did know me fairly well IRL and my past, etc. and you were to question my type through
- meaning bringing up past behaviors, actions, mannerisims, etc. to go against my questionable typing, I would not be upset by this according to socionics, but in fact relieved, glad, and amused that you were doing this and would have reacted accordingly. Thus, you were not making an
judgment in questioning my type.
In fact in asking me questions about me and my type that were purely based on
. Do you do this? What do you think of this? With enough open-endedness left in order to allow for the
true depiction of type without making the questions obvious ESFp answers or yes/no. Hence, in you questioning my type you were solely shitting on my
- cold-harded, analysis of my own person.
Does that make better sense?