In all of my research, it feels like intertype descriptions are always so negative. In no way do I mean talking about how relationships can struggle is
fauxpunk Yesterday, 11:52 PMHonestly, yes. I think that I oversimplified things a bit back then. I think that I construed Ni to mean time alone, but Ni in itself is a lot more advanced
DEAD Yesterday, 08:08 PMI think what is even worse than correlationism is "bad" correlationism i.e. to justify a typing in a given system by or with another. This would
godslave Yesterday, 07:05 PMTo simply acknowledge that they are underlining similarities. Someone who types as LII sx8, sx2 ILI, or sp8 EII is most definately mistyped.
Muira Yesterday, 06:51 PMI wonder what is the point Typology aficionados want to make in trying to correlate typologies that were not invented to be correlated in the first place.
godslave Yesterday, 06:49 PM
Negative Descriptions
LOL yeah. I guess it’s because duality is held as the ideal/good standard, so descriptions of any other ITR are framed such that they emphasize
loopyclouds Today, 12:40 AM