Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Mr P/reality D on how 4D Se and Fe are bad for me, but I can ah e it’s behavior and how that’s actually operative of XEI in model G—-
Braingel Today, 08:55 PMMr P/reality D on how 4D Se and Fe are bad for me, but I can have its behavior in transience and how that’s actually operative of XEI in model G—-
Braingel Today, 08:52 PMThe irony of Qaz is that even in behavioral models like model G, my behavior isn’t even 4D Fe… [MENTION=7122]The Reality Denialist[/MENTION] who has studied
Braingel Today, 08:50 PMFunny enough, a unconcern for accuracy is Ti/Te superego in modern socionics, yet more or so Ti superego in classical.
Muira Today, 08:47 PMIt would be quite funny if he was projecting his own SEE ness unto myself, but I don’t believe he’d ignore Si or be 1D Ti, his Ti would be
Braingel Today, 08:45 PMWhich theoretically would explain why he isn't afraid of emotionally confronting you either.
Generally speaking, Fe and even Fi polar is
I wouldn't even say LSI, probably maybe some sort of ESI/SEE as Te polar in classical socionics from my own judgement seems more aligned with Se/Ti/Te
Muira Today, 08:41 PMI really do think he’s a classical SEI. The neurosis of his hidden agenda Ti is clear and is the root of his emotionally abusive behavior, where
Braingel Today, 08:39 PMHe doesn't even attempt to prove his correctness backed by evidence from credible sources, which is indeed more ethical than logical in Aushra's ditch.
Muira Today, 08:37 PM
Hello, Could you figure out my type?
So whenever people stereotype that behavior as eie in me to, they’re also wrong.. It’s actually more IEI and SEI aligned..
Braingel Today, 08:56 PM