Are you polyamorousOriginally Posted by queentiger
Are you polyamorous
Obviously
I think Kill4Me is beta ST , SLE-Ti probably
Basic qualities exemplified by SLE: volitional pressure, the uncontrollable desire for activity, sporting tone and resoluteness. They are people of activity; contemplation, as a way of life, is absolutely alien to them. They will attempt, by any means, to achieve their goals, their means of achievement are not hampered by ceremonial(i.e. bureaucratic) regulations.
In their struggles SLE will never yield initiative. If necessary they will wait for the proper moment to act and will never forsake the opportunity at hand. Their influence is governed by their power, often they don’t think, to themselves of other [strange] ways to solve problems.
How lucky ! I'm not. I'm a demisexual.
I'm having doubts about this lately. Pretty sure he is beta irrational though..
I haven't seen any reason to think Kill4Me isn't SLE.
Number 9 may or may not be, there doesn't seem to be much (if any) Ti in his posts from what I've observed. If he wants to explain why he thinks he is one and convince us, now is a good time.
I saw his old questionnaire, he seems too nice to be a logical type. He might be SEE but also IEE.
He is LSI-Se.
WTF is this shit? This is why I think arguments in favor of unbridled free speech should be revisited--not everyone deserves to offer an opinion.First off, define "nice?" I'll wait, all the while knowing the response will be something that justifies my bewilderment. Regardless, it doesn't matter, because how "nice" (read: kind, friendly) someone is or is not technically has NOTHING to do with their sociotype. All types can be nice, nasty, "nicety," whatever, and can even present as such without actually embodying that attribute, and so it's an unreliable indicator. Furthermore, the mirage of the SLE is the SEI, who in colloquial terms, are probably considered to be the "nicest" of all the types. If it weren't customary on some level for SLEs to present as "nice," upbeat, pleasant enough, helpful, down to earth, etc..., then it would be hard to see how they could be the mirage relation of the SEI.
Lemme guess, you studied Socionics under @Sol's tutelage?
P.S. lemme flex my Fi real quick > I don't like you.And so I'm thinking of attaching myself to your ass like the worst fissure.
You take yourself too seriously. I'm not reading long winded, exhausting comments over a half hearted post I madeWTF is this shit? This is why I think arguments in favor of unbridled free speech should be revisited--not everyone deserves to offer an opinion.
Lemme guess, you studied Socionics under @Sol's tutelage?
P.S. lemme flex my Fi real quick > I don't like you.
On the other hand, you do seem to have value judgments of people and hold personal grudges which makes EIE seem more likely
I thought you were gonna say Bertrand, he typed EIE in the end, which I think fits him well... (Bertrand I hope you're ok~)
It's a shame for humankind but I'd type Sperma EIE too... he typed himself EIE at some point too, more accurate than ILE anyway
^I'm pretty sure Spermatozoa is EIE.
1.) Exactly, Gamma Quadra is "serious" and #teamspiteful and so I fit; but you're a "half-hearted," merry type gal, huh? That + the confused, scrunched "stank" face your posts illicit from me = SEI Final type.You take yourself too seriously. I'm not reading long winded, exhausting comments over a half hearted post I made
On the other hand, you do seem to have value judgments of people and hold personal grudges which makes EIE seem more likely
2.) Please don't procreate. a.] my first criticism of your comment concerned its invisible objective logic. b.] afterwards, yes, I made a subjective, Fi based value judgment. You do know that logical types still make decisions based on "feeling" in real time, just as feeling types (not you, so much) can make logical judgments in real time, right? Didn't @Sol teach that in his grey, musty, sweaty goat ball smelling cubicle with the flickering fluorescent lights overhead and the starving mice fighting over old cigarette butts?
why tf would i wanna convince u
sperma seems EII, but idk maybe EIE
nah prolly EII 4w5
At this point I'm pretti sure Alonzo too. (@his last post)
Moou self reports as belonging to the male gender.
lol fk u
@Alonzo
you have nice imagination to support N for you
still nothing good in logics. just Fe drama. keep trying
also seems you have Si as nonvalued, as what you do not like you describe in Si terms. this supports EIE, IEI for you
you seem to behave closer to EIE, still
@Moou? confirm?
@Moou? confirm?
..I thought u were f
... Sorry to disappoint..I thought u were f
It's the near-neutrality of ESI-Fi combined with the non-aggression of e9. Plus, that little duck avatar kind of throws you off...I thought u were f
I'm sure IRL Moou looks male enough.
@Moou I will survive :/
and yeah, what Adam said + the pink milk... you're on a whole new level Moou : )
Hey, Moou. Are you around 36, gainfully employed and living near Ohio? If so, I've got an LIE-Te you should meet.
*poof*
lol, give her the duck @Moou
Hahaha
I'm 20, gay and living in NJ
...Sorry to disappoint (again)
Who says you can't find true love on this site?
EDIT: oh, mouu, apparently.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
this was too funny
Damn. She (my LIE-Te friend) is pretty open to new experiences, but that might be a stretch.
Two weeks ago she rejected an ESI-Se I found because he was 24; 12 years younger than her. (I think she's missing a bet, but it's her decision.)
Oh, well, the search goes on.
this site is full of beautiful young gays though.. who knows who knowsWho says you can't find true love on this site?
EDIT: oh, mouu, apparently.
You know, you can be a particular breed of daft, at times. I'm trolling HARD with my creative Ni. Furthermore, there's no way in all 9 hells you and I utilize Te/Ti with similar strengths. No way. And so EIE is out of the question. On top of the whole not being an empath thing. Seriously, catch a clue, any clue.
I met a 25 yo gay LIE about two years ago, so there is hope. Didn't get his name, tho.
@Alonzo Ni troll hard? no, Ni is the function too concerned about its own vision to give a damn about the outside.. so it would be more about Te, but Te doesn't troll... Fe is about expression instead, positive or negative, it's the same. Te is expressive like a glass full of water. And you're a fizzy orange juice.
The entire point of this site is to discuss, interpret, and expand on Socionics. Being able to create a constructive argument for how you use or think you (or others) use IEs makes your viewpoint more valuable for everyone.
So either contribute or just continue to run around like a chicken with its head cut off and cease to be relevant.
thanks for your marriage agency services AdamI met a 25 yo gay LIE about two years ago, so there is hope. Didn't get his name, tho.
Hey, I'm an Optimizer to the core. You are welcome.thanks for your marriage agency services Adam
Incidentally, they say that duality is about finding someone whom you need to be exactly the way they are. I think creating optimized solutions is What I Do.
yes, very efficient. my ex LIE bestie was like that too, engaging everyone, pity she used to create the worst matches around, for others but especially for herself...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote