SOLTI Socionics Test

[Persephone]

@GOLDEN, SLI is not your second, it appears as your conflictor actually (+second possible conflictor => SEI). Your second is SEE (there is almost no Ni out there )

[golden]

@GOLDEN, SLI is not your second, it appears as your conflictor actually (+second possible conflictor => SEI). Your second is SEE (there is almost no Ni out there )

fixed, thanks--now I understand how the chart is drawn up

[Sol]

It appears to be more in depth than most of the socioinics tests.

It's just short version of old Talanov's test. It appears to give much bullshit as also uses wrong Reinin's dichotomies hypothesis. Without RD it could be interesting.

[Persephone]

It's just short version of old Talanov's test. It appears to give much bullshit as also uses wrong Reinin's dichotomies hypothesis. Without RD it could be interesting.

The old 700 question test has both options, either just Jungian or with Reinin. I have the detailed report.

[silke]

I obtained SLE, LSE, SEE, SLI, LSI as the result - it's a strange test in how it suggests quasi-identical types so close to each other, when quasis differ substantially on dichotomies, IE values, quadra values, etc.

[Myst]

I obtained SLE, LSE, SEE, SLI, LSI as the result - it's a strange test in how it suggests quasi-identical types so close to each other, when quasis differ substantially on dichotomies, IE values, quadra values, etc.

My guess is it counts every measured variable into the type results where the jungian dichotomies and base/demonstrative functions would have a lot of weight usually.

[Sisyphean]

lolwut

sle results.jpg

standard.jpg