Originally Posted by Solaris
PS: Person VIs ESI or LSI.
PS: Person VIs ESI or LSI.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Pics 1, 2,3, ESI. Pic 2 looks just like the woman in my dream if her hair was darker and she was wearing a black dress.
Pic 4 is an expression I know very well because I have seen it my whole life on the face of my LSI mother. In pics and in person.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Pic 4 does look hella ISTj
lol i can see LSIness happening in the 1st and last pic but the third pic has that distinctive SEI curved up, giggly, playful smile omg!
I thought you were ESE, since you're a storm of smileys ... till I heard you talk about injustice and processing paradox or oxymoronic constructions here: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...14#post1033714
haha solaris
yeah i bet! if you'd see me irl you'd say SLE at first glance cause of the explosive Se creative. but lol the nerdiness comes through eventually
SLI?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
My imagination is taking me towards LSI for her...
You're pretty attractive. @Amber
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...Can-you-VI-her
Last edited by suedehead; 04-11-2015 at 08:19 PM.
This thread has so much win1511014_1570573119879415_4322597398161841686_n.jpg
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
I actually met someone who looked very similar with similar mimicry (esp. pic 2 and 4) to this person the other weekend. She was LSI imo
I get repeated suggestions on here that I should take my specialization in African American culture and Gender Studies to more concrete forms, which is a bit of a stretch for some reason. Too much of a clash of values here.
Thnx. I identify with LSI a lot ....but Beta as a quadra is totally foreign to me.ryoka14 I actually met someone who looked very similar with similar mimicry (esp. pic 2 and 4) to this person the other weekend. She was LSI imo
Last edited by Amber; 05-13-2015 at 09:00 AM.
ESI bona fide
Ditch the fella n lets meet up
I definitely see you as ESI/LSI
The pics in the first post I would guess xSI too, though I really only rarely try to do VI on people.
ISFj
Picture #1 - Looks smart, like she knows what she is doing and wouldn't get fooled by BS. - ESI.
Picture #2 - Looks a bit like my LII sister (50% Czech), or a bit like an ILI woman I know - LII?.
Picture #3 - Looks like a lot of fun. ESI.
Picture #4 - Looks a bit like the looks I've sometimes gotten from my IEI cousin, but still probably ESI.
Oh, man. These pics were posted right in the middle of some forum tension and a dash of confusion about my type. Came here as LSI, then thought of ILI, which a few ppl didn't agree with and suggested LSI or IEI. My good old noncompetitive female friends like aylen, blackburry - no2 ..... woofl, radio etc. - no1. To clear up a few issues I posted pics. Strange that people only considered ESI in this thread.
Now I don't really care about that anymore .... but my turn:
- pic 1: ESI-Fi among some relatives for Xmas
- pic 2: creative Se (sensory subtype) under serious urban circumstances
- pic 3: EIE or SEE live in Potsdam
- pic 4 :LSI in Bacall/Beckham mode
Last edited by Amber; 05-15-2015 at 10:29 PM.
I could have sworn these were all the same person at different times. i guess not? Although 3 and 4 do look pretty different.
2 and 3 is kinda me right now ... with a different bob and hair color. but I bet they come across as different persons ...on good grounds tbh.
I think we all know by now the photos are ESI, and you are ESI.
I think we all know we could marry up the forum girl with the hot girl in the photos.
Thanks for being here and imho please keep posting your insight and humour.
Her personality is Ti-LSI.
My god this is the most cryptic reply you could've managed.
I'll do my best to fit other people's own brand of FiSe:
I'm watching a TV show about online forums now and a speaker comments: "I don't know why some members post the same thing twice after they delete it and apparently reconsider it or are totally uncertain but still become convinced to grab the bull by the horns."
So I'm surely a Negativist, Constructivist, Democratic, and Asking type. Mid-way between Process/Result (in terms of habits and actions I do things sequentially, immerse in the process, and I don't multitask ...but I can see my own thinking style as more inductive>deductive). Causal-Deterministic is totally not-me .... H-P and D-A are somewhat like me. I don't care enough to build a more expansive argument right now. And others don't seem to have a solid case for alternative typings anyway.
Last edited by Amber; 05-15-2015 at 10:06 PM.
I don't know if you are ESI or LSI, tbh, these reinin crap dichotomies aren't entirely convincing but if you also see yourself as Fi-base then okay.
I'm sorry you never experienced anything that turned you into a new person. But I owe you an answer: you have the Ti need for total disambiguation and boundary/distinctions-setting. Ti negativist works.
Last edited by Amber; 05-20-2015 at 09:09 PM.
This is not an improvement lol
you don't know that, because you're not me or ppl who have a clue about my life
Are you being deliberately confusing?
Because if so, good job
no, I just think you´re LII-Ti and we're miscommunicating bcoz I think we're talking personality changes and you're talking >>>
Nope..I was actually just asking if it was the same person in each picture.no, I just think you´re LII-Ti and we're miscommunicating bcoz I think we're talking personality changes and you're talking >>>
How many posts did it take you to reach this question?
I implied it heavily in the first, not sure why it was misinterpreted.
I see, well they are the same person however what was not clear was how you meant it by saying
Bolded part were you new it is what you implied the most out of your post.
So Amber posted about the stages in her life she was at when the photos were taken, with implications of how she felt, ie in some ways they are different people due to perhaps being at different outlooks and places in her life, perhaps even happiness and fufillment levels.
In fact, she was speaking to you in a very human way, but you did not pick up on this, hence it got to the stage were you were presented with a mathematical equation representing the idea that 1 + 1 = 2, which is actually quite funny considering how you removed the actual crux of what poster Amber was saying, and the typing of you .... but it appears you did not get this part of the reasoning or the humour too.
In a sense it is saying you are logical but logic which moves away from the extraverted sense, in that it is a logic but an internal subjective form of logic in that you had already decided the binary of replies, hence Ti leading and the strength of it being Ti sub type with Ti leading is part of the diagnosis.
"I guess not?" A question that is open ended indicates a lack of information. It is most natural to fill these gaps before moving on, to prevent miscommunication. Anyway, this has gotten pretty silly, so Im not going to keep wasting thread space on a derail, for the sake of future readers.
Dude, there's no point in quoting me and going on about it, you can be a horse led to water but don't expect people to force you to drink.
dude, maybe your Se polr prevents you from VI and hence correlations between people and looks. So why even comment in typing threads.
I don't expect you to sense happiness or fulfillment levels from pics ... let's say because you' don't have strong Fi or Fe to read people. But you said absolutely nothing about my type btw. You were just stuck on some voodoo line of logic going on in your head and you were Ti-mystified for some reasons.
I think he simply took your original post in the most literal way possible. That could be the strong Ti, for sure. I can get quite literal myself but I didn't take that post of yours in such a literal way for some reason.
Anyway.. I'm quite curious if you explicitly identify with Fi-base&Te-suggestive or you typed ESI just by the reinins/cogstyle descriptions. Tell me more?
Also, more on your pics that I didn't add originally; the first pic was a bit shocking on first sight because it could've been taken of myself. Don't get me wrong, we do have different physical features but the look itself was very familiar lol. I could say the same of 2nd and 4th pics.
I'm pretty goddamn sure I'm LSI>ESI but 1) I don't trust VI 100%, far from it so you don't have to be the same type I am just based on a few pics 2) I was also respecting your self-typing too by giving the benefit of the doubt and so I went with generic xSI when I VI'd your pics. But rethinking it, I'm muuuch less sure on the ESI option being justified in any way for these pics. So I'll update my VI on your pics from xSI to LSI.
Your forum posts could go either way, ESI vs LSI, you do get quite personal in ways I simply don't see the point of but I cannot tell if that must be a type related thing for you or not.
Last edited by Myst; 05-22-2015 at 06:42 AM.
a Feeler type
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote