Page 32 of 36 FirstFirst ... 22282930313233343536 LastLast
Results 1,241 to 1,280 of 1439

Thread: The Ukraine Question

  1. #1241
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WinnieW View Post


    This video is all about military facts and strategy... so much Te... I don't see value judgement.
    The guy seems Fe-PoLR to me.

    I think the guy is ESI. Surprisingly, a lot of ESIs work hard in the sciences and are pretty good at Te.

    He is giving a very detailed explanation of the things right in front of him. What I do not see is the rolling persuasion that is characteristic of LIEs. An LIE would be rolling up towards the course of action that he wants his audience to undertake.

    This guy is entirely about "This happened, and then this happened, and this is the situation, and this happened in the past, and this is what we saw." Nothing about "This is the situation, and because of X, we can exploit the enemy's Y to accomplish Z if we do not hesitate to act now."

    As for you not seeing "value judgement", he isn't giving his opinion about what should be done in a tactical or a strategic sense, because ESIs can tell you everything there is to know about what happened and what is happening, including what is impossible, but they won't tell you what the best course of action should be, because they don't know.

    He actually does express his value judgement subtly in the video when he shows the video of the Ukrainians singing the national anthem in a group, just before they launched the latest offensive. The scene has almost religious overtones, and as we know, the HA of an ESI is "to believe". If that isn't showing which set of values he has, then I don't know what is.



    If you want to see Te in a war blogger (no Ni, though), there is Jake Broe, LSE extraordinaire. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEnPUJLNgRk

    And here is Ti in a war blogger, in Denys Davydov, LII. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2tGHqq_Dlo

    If you want Fe-PoLR*, you could watch the SLI, Operator Starsky, in his regular reports on Ukraine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l3bP8xaLPQ, and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKTZs7_L8E

    *An easy way to recognize Fe-PoLR is to watch for a comment from them that says "You are so fucking stupid." (ILIs can do this, too.)
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-19-2022 at 11:26 PM.

  2. #1242
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,695
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That was a somewhat rushed post I did, I watched only about 4 minutes of the video.

  3. #1243
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    An Estonian politician talks about the Russian travel ban, to a Russian-speaking audience in Estonia.

    Some people say that Russians should be banned completely from polite society, and other people say that a travel ban is counter-productive because it doesn't allow the "good Russians" a means to escape Russia.

    Most of the countries which border Russia and which have histories of dealing with Russians have imposed travel bans. The US government has not followed their lead, saying that a ban on Russians traveling to the US would be counter-productive.

    Personally, I think that the US position is a result of the fact that many Russians work in the US for the government in some capacity, and a surprisingly large number of them are racist, Jew-hating, conservative Russian imperialists who are in the States purely because Russia is a cesspool and they can live a better life here while still hating the US, and not because they disagree with Putin's imperialist ambitions. These Russians have not renounced their Russian citizenship and would be deported under a travel ban. Mostly, they are really smart guys who happen to be authoritarians, and the US military-industrial complex is using them to sharpen the US advantage in the world.

    Anyway, here's what the Estonian said about Russians, to Russians:

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    You have to understand the Estonian state, the government is not in the business of sorting out what Russians are good or bad. This has very little interest to us. We are concerned with protecting our security. We are primarily interested in supporting Ukraine at the moment. For the sake of them winning this war.


    I'm sorry to say that this may be so, but in my generation, there is no longer any confidence in Estonian Politics that Russia will become a normal country, a normal neighbor for Estonia in the coming decades. And basically, we want you to lose this war.


    We want to weaken your military capabilities for the next decades. We don't want to see you rebuild your economy. We want the opposite. The sanctions that the West has imposed, they're already starting to work. We see that they are already affecting the Russian Federations' ability to fight, they will work even more and more.


    We will give up Russian energy. We absolutely do no care whether Russian tourists come back or not. What the Estonian foreign minister said: "We are not waiting for them here."


    So this is a completely different game. We feel like Israel, which at one point saw itself surrounded by Arab countries, which wanted to destroy Israel. Because we look at what your government is doing, and we listen carefully, we read not only Putin, but Patrushev, Gerasimov, your Medvedev, all these representatives of Russia and in whose name they are now fighting, killing people of Ukraine say. That's our position right there.


    To tell you the truth, we don't really care which Russians living in Russia are good or bad. This is not our business.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/com...ated_estonian/
    .

  4. #1244
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    An Estonian politician talks about the Russian travel ban, to a Russian-speaking audience in Estonia.

    Some people say that Russians should be banned completely from polite society, and other people say that a travel ban is counter-productive because it doesn't allow the "good Russians" a means to escape Russia.

    Most of the countries which border Russia and which have histories of dealing with Russians have imposed travel bans. The US government has not followed their lead, saying that a ban on Russians traveling to the US would be counter-productive.

    Personally, I think that the US position is a result of the fact that many Russians work in the US for the government in some capacity, and a surprisingly large number of them are racist, Jew-hating, conservative Russian imperialists who are in the States purely because Russia is a cesspool and they can live a better life here while still hating the US, and not because they disagree with Putin's imperialist ambitions. These Russians have not renounced their Russian citizenship and would be deported under a travel ban. Mostly, they are really smart guys who happen to be authoritarians, and the US military-industrial complex is using them to sharpen the US advantage in the world.
    Adam, if we're indicting the Russian people on the basis of their chauvinism, we'd have to apply the same logic to the Ukrainians. Ukraine wasn't an inclusive, liberal society before the war, and it was even moving in the opposite direction.

    There were state-imposed attempts to reduce the use of the Russian language, for one thing. Civil servants were mandated to use Ukrainian instead of Russian (1); laws were passed that restricted teachers from teaching Russian (and other minority languages, like Hungarian and Romanian) in schools (2). Even if we grant that Russians are a non-indigenous, late addition to a preceding Ukrainian entity — a country that they invaded and colonized during the eighteenth century — and were a fifth column that was more loyal to Russia than to Ukraine, it's still wrong to suppress their culture.

    I don't like the Kremlin and don't like this invasion, which, unless an international court says otherwise, seems to me to be a crime against peace (3) and the root cause of multiple war crimes. I believe that international law should be upheld and that countries which violate it should be punished. And even if we believe (as I do) that Russia was provoked by NATO's overreach into Eastern Europe, nothing justifies retaliation by war.

    But by being in Ukraine, by propping up one form of chauvinism against another, we have to at least acknowledge that the West is taking sides in a civil war between different ethnic nationalisms (and now, with the continuing rise of far-right groups like the AZOV battalion, there is even less hope for a Ukraine that tolerates ethnic heterogeneity).

    As for those people who believe that Ukraine has the right to choose its foreign policy, the right to full autonomy, and the right to self-determination, in the most absolute terms and irrespective of any tectonic geopolitical fallout: Why not extend the same sympathy to the Russian-speaking separatist republics in the Donbass?



    We want to weaken your military capabilities for the next decades. We don't want to see you rebuild your economy. We want the opposite. The sanctions that the West has imposed, they're already starting to work. We see that they are already affecting the Russian Federations' ability to fight, they will work even more and more.
    But none of this is guaranteed.

    Sanctions haven't destroyed Russia's economy so far, which seems to be reindustrializing via import substitution. Economic sanctions haven't stopped Russian trade with other emerging countries (many of which have their own skepticism towards the United States). And Russia has so far succeeded in trading in local currencies.

    The Russian army, which hasn't performed as well as the Russian MoD had hoped, and which apparently isn't strong enough to offer an existential threat to NATO, has shown that it can still capture 20% of a NATO-backed country (an area the size of England). And, once this war is over, whether or not it loses, its army will have gained massive experience and a direction for reform.

    Unless we're prepared to occupy or destroy it, Russia still has the potential to threaten Ukraine again. Russia recovered and reformed after its defeat during the Crimean war. Under Joseph Stalin, it had fully recovered (within a generation) from an even worse military defeat and a civil war.

    Countries recover from defeat. They don't recover from humiliation. Only diplomacy offers a permanent solution.
    Last edited by xerx; 09-21-2022 at 04:29 AM. Reason: a few words

  5. #1245
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerx View Post
    Adam, if we're indicting the Russian people on the basis of their chauvinism, we'd have to apply the same logic to the Ukrainians. Ukraine wasn't an inclusive, liberal society before the war, and it was even moving in the opposite direction.

    There were state-imposed attempts to reduce the use of the Russian language, for one thing. Civil servants were mandated to use Ukrainian instead of Russian (1); laws were passed that restricted teachers from teaching Russian (and other minority languages, like Hungarian and Romanian) in schools (2). Even if we grant that Russians are a non-indigenous, late addition to a preceding Ukrainian entity — a country that they invaded and colonized during the eighteenth century — and were a fifth column that was more loyal to Russia than to Ukraine, it's still wrong to suppress their culture.

    I don't like the Kremlin and don't like this invasion, which, unless an international court says otherwise, seems to me to be a crime against peace (3) and the root cause of multiple war crimes. I believe that international law should be upheld and that countries which violate it should be punished. And even if we believe (as I do) that Russia was provoked by NATO's overreach into Eastern Europe, nothing justifies retaliation by war.

    But by being in Ukraine, by propping up one form of chauvinism against another, we have to at least acknowledge that the West is taking sides in a civil war between different ethnic nationalisms (and now, with the continuing rise of far-right groups like the AZOV battalion, there is even less hope for a Ukraine that tolerates ethnic heterogeneity).

    As for those people who believe that Ukraine has the right to choose its foreign policy, the right to full autonomy, and the right to self-determination, in the most absolute terms and irrespective of any tectonic geopolitical fallout: Why not extend the same sympathy to the Russian-speaking separatist republics in the Donbass?





    But none of this is guaranteed.

    Sanctions haven't destroyed Russia's economy so far, which seems to be reindustrializing via import substitution. Economic sanctions haven't stopped Russian trade with other emerging countries (many of which have their own skepticism towards the United States). And Russia has so far succeeded in trading in local currencies.

    The Russian army, which hasn't performed as well as the Russian MoD had hoped, and which apparently isn't strong enough to offer an existential threat to NATO, has shown that it can still capture 20% of a NATO-backed country (an area the size of England). And, once this war is over, whether or not it loses, its army will have gained massive experience and a direction for reform.

    Unless we're prepared to occupy or destroy it, Russia still has the potential to threaten Ukraine again. Russia recovered and reformed after its defeat during the Crimean war. Under Joseph Stalin, it had fully recovered (within a generation) from an even worse military defeat and a civil war.

    Countries recover from defeat. They don't recover from humiliation. Only diplomacy offers a permanent solution.
    @xerx, I disagree with you on almost every point, but it's late and I'm not up to presenting a point-by-point rebuttal at the moment. Maybe later.

    I do admire your optimism, though. Very refreshing, especially since I tend to go very dark sometimes.

  6. #1246
    Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    2,790
    Mentioned
    188 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I’m sorry but Putin is such an desperate loser.

    He really tried to invade Ukraine with like half a tank of gas and blames NATO for all of his problems like a jealous abusive boyfriend who holds everyone but himself accountable. “I’m mad that Ukraine likes the West more than me. Now I must mobilize for war. It’s your fault for making me mad!!@ You deserve to be hurt for hurting my feelings. Make another move and I swear I’ll fuckin crack your head open dude—I have a nuclear arsenal and I’m not afraid to use it! Laugh at me one more time, I dare you..”

  7. #1247
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    I’m sorry but Putin is such an desperate loser.

    He really tried to invade Ukraine with like half a tank of gas and blames NATO for all of his problems like a jealous abusive boyfriend who holds everyone but himself accountable. “I’m mad that Ukraine likes the West more than me. Now I must mobilize for war. It’s your fault for making me mad!!@ You deserve to be hurt for hurting my feelings. Make another move and I swear I’ll fuckin crack your head open dude—I have a nuclear arsenal and I’m not afraid to use it! Laugh at me one more time, I dare you..”

    Authoritarian regimes are composed of people who want a strong ruler who will brutally punish their enemies, who are ubiquitous. This means that the more cruel and punitive the leader is, the more the authoritarian followers love them. You can see this behavior in Trump’s followers, too. It’s a cycle of abuse, but it seems to be widespread in populations.

    This means that Putin, or any guy who rules people like this, have almost no restraints placed on their behavior by their supporters. Their end has to come from outside their support group, from people who either are not authoritarian or are stronger than the ruler.

    If you have spent a lifetime being rewarded for behaving as if you are above the law, you are probably not going to be able to moderate your behavior just because things seem to be going badly right now.
    Witness both Trump and Putin doubling down on their bets.

    Both of them are also making vague threats that there will be terrible consequences if they are opposed in the slightest.
    Well, they are right about that.
    There will be terrible consequences. For them.


    Let’s talk about nuclear weapons. First, they will not end civilization. There haven’t been just two bombs exploded in history; there have been thousands, all exploded in tests, and the world keeps chugging along. Burning carbon is a much bigger threat.
    Second, a nuclear bomb is one of the most complex devices ever made by humans, and the trigger mechanisms sit right next to a source of very hard radiation. Radiation tends to weaken metals and wiring and destroys electronics, which means that the triggers have to be replaced every four years or so, or else the bomb just won’t go off.
    Putin has been in charge of Russia for twenty years. That’s twenty years of stealing everything that can be resold. Russia has the most advanced jet fighter in the world, and has been able to build and maintain about five of them.
    Russia has one of the most advanced tanks in the world, and they have been able to build and maintain just a very few of them.
    Russia has very advanced delivery rockets, and about one third of them fail to get anywhere near their target. As for numbers, they are taking the rockets from the ring defenses around St. Petersburg to use to bomb Ukrainians.
    What are the chances that Russia’s nuclear arsenal is any different? Do they have five working devices? Do they have rockets that will get these devices anywhere near their target?

    Most knowledgeable experts say no.

    Russia is currently leveling cities and killing everyone in and around them. Does it make any difference to the dead that they died by conventional or by nuclear weapons? At least, a nuclear bomb doesn’t torture you for weeks before killing you.

    Putin and Trump really are like serial abuser husbands. They threaten ultimate violence in order to perpetuate continuous violence.
    They both need to be course-corrected.

  8. #1248
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    I do admire your optimism, though. Very refreshing
    Thanks. I'm definitely an optimistic person, but I'm not advocating for diplomacy from a sense of naive idealism.

    My opinion comes from listening to policymakers like Kissinger, Brzezinski, and George Kennan (for the record, and to put a very fine point on it: I do not share these men's politics or world-view, only their opinions about the current conflict). They believed, with some variation between them, that peace with Russia was possible, that NATO shouldn't be expanded, and that security could be achieved by rapprochement with Russia.

    These aren't people who formed their opinions randomly. They probably met with hundreds of world leaders, read thousands of foreign policy documents, and developed a sense for what was possible and impossible in foreign policy. If they believed that peace was possible, they surely had well-thought-out reasons for believing as they did.

  9. #1249
    DogOfDanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's always amusing watching left-wing authoritarians wax poetic about the psychology of right wing authoritarians.
    While people point to Putins behavior as erratic, and it is... this is a shallow way of thinking. NATO has been working to undermine / overthrow communism and Russia since WW2 ended. We funded the war in Syria to take out Russias allies & strategic position in the middle east... that war was actually alot bloodier than this one, but it wasn't very covered by the news because we were driving it.
    It is naive to pretend that NATO has not been in a state of undeclared war with Russia and is not indirectly responsible for this war. Which does not mean Russia isn't primarily responsible.
    It's funny because I was listening to some Russian soldiers who defected, and it was only after defection that they could see outside of the Russian controlled media bubble. They were shocked that their military would commit the sort of crimes against civilians we are seeing. But people in the West aren't really that different... we have committed far worse crimes in just the last 10 years.
    As for Trump - you can say what you want about his social policies, his scapegoating of immigrants, the fact he was an arrogant narcissist... these things are true, but one thing he did right is he ended the war in Syria. Meanwhile your precious Biden / Obama administration are the ones who started that war. This high-browed philosophical soap boxing about the psychology of authoritarian strong men... it is just left-wingers with their own noses very far up their asses. The US may have a nice cushy set of domestic policies but globally they're the most hated nation... even after this crisis in Ukraine the US is still far more hated than Russia.
    Last edited by DogOfDanger; 09-22-2022 at 02:29 PM.

  10. #1250
    Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    2,790
    Mentioned
    188 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Both of them are also making vague threats that there will be terrible consequences if they are opposed in the slightest.
    Well, they are right about that.
    There will be terrible consequences. For them.
    @Adam Strange- Making vague threats of violence is a move used by cowards to maintain plausible deniability. Also they know that the mere threat of violence is usually enough to get people to comply. It’s manipulative and abusive and there should be consequences. It’ll be interesting to see what happens if Putin is “re-elected” in 2024.

  11. #1251
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DogOfDanger View Post
    It's always amusing watching left-wing authoritarians wax poetic about the psychology of right wing authoritarians.
    While people point to Putins behavior as erratic, and it is... this is a shallow way of thinking. NATO has been working to undermine / overthrow communism and Russia since WW2 ended. We funded the war in Syria to take out Russias allies & strategic position in the middle east... that war was actually alot bloodier than this one, but it wasn't very covered by the news because we were driving it.
    It is naive to pretend that NATO has not been in a state of undeclared war with Russia and is not indirectly responsible for this war. Which does not mean Russia isn't primarily responsible.
    It's funny because I was listening to some Russian soldiers who defected, and it was only after defection that they could see outside of the Russian controlled media bubble. They were shocked that their military would commit the sort of crimes against civilians we are seeing. But people in the West aren't really that different... we have committed far worse crimes in just the last 10 years.
    As for Trump - you can say what you want about his social policies, his scapegoating of immigrants, the fact he was an arrogant narcissist... these things are true, but one thing he did right is he ended the war in Syria. Meanwhile your precious Biden / Obama administration are the ones who started that war. This high-browed philosophical soap boxing about the psychology of authoritarian strong men... it is just left-wingers with their own noses very far up their asses. The US may have a nice cushy set of domestic policies but globally they're the most hated nation... even after this crisis in Ukraine the US is still far more hated than Russia.
    How do you know that the US is globally "the most hated nation... even after this crisis in Ukraine the US is still far more hated than Russia."?

    Can you cite sources, or did you just decide that this is true? Because the number of people actively trying to move into or out of these two respective countries doesn't support your assertion.
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-22-2022 at 04:16 PM.

  12. #1252
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    @Adam Strange- Making vague threats of violence is a move used by cowards to maintain plausible deniability. Also they know that the mere threat of violence is usually enough to get people to comply. It’s manipulative and abusive and there should be consequences. It’ll be interesting to see what happens if Putin is “re-elected” in 2024.
    My ILI shrink told me yesterday that there are four ways to get what you want, and they involve increasing amounts of coercion. They are:

    1.) Make a request. In other words, just ask for what you want. No coercion involved. The person being asked can fulfill your request or not, as they see fit.

    2.) Do deals. Trade something that you have, or can do, for something that that they have, or can do. Again, no coercion involved.

    3.) Manipulation. Try to manipulate the other person into complying, usually by lies or by deception. This method doesn't involve direct coersion, but it does involve deception, and therefore it disrespects the other person.

    4.) Force. Taking physical action against the other person, and this does involve coercion, and it disrespects the other person, too.

    Trump says that he's at Level 2, but long experience indicates that he's steadily been at level 3.
    Putin is all Level 4, all the time.


    Level 1: Asking for what you want - https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/com...n_you_do_that/

    Level 4: Forcing them to do what you want - https://www.reddit.com/r/ukraine/com..._volunteering/
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-22-2022 at 05:19 PM.

  13. #1253
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    An incredibly attractive and intelligent Russian female.



    Most of the time, she looks like an ESI, but in her photographs from the rally, she looks SEI.

    More proof that your Dual can look like your Conflictor.

  14. #1254
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Russian mobilization is going well. All according to plan.

    https://nitter.net/bigSAC10/status/1...918586888192#m

  15. #1255
    DogOfDanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    How do you know that the US is globally "the most hated nation... even after this crisis in Ukraine the US is still far more hated than Russia."?

    Can you cite sources
    Very easily

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ies-poll-shows

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/116350/position-world.aspx

    popularity_poll.png

    Notice the spikes / dips in the worlds approval centering around our invasion of Iraq / funding of the war in Syria. Also notice the increase (gasp) in approval from 2016-2020 - same reason, war in Syria.

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    or did you just decide that this is true?
    Not that it matters, but there's a big difference between arbitrarily deciding something is true and observing trends that suggest a thing is true.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    Because the number of people actively trying to move into or out of these two respective countries doesn't support your assertion.
    Actually, your statement here wouldn't support or discredit the assertion since we're talking about global approval, whereas this is a matter of the countries domestics.

    Carry onward!
    Last edited by DogOfDanger; 09-23-2022 at 03:20 PM.

  16. #1256
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Russia has committed war crimes, apparently, according to UN investigators. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-investigators By using cluster munitions that don't distinguish between combatants and civilians, performing executions, torture, etc.

  17. #1257
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Beyond the Pale
    TIM
    Heretic
    Posts
    7,017
    Mentioned
    151 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerx View Post
    Russia has committed war crimes, apparently, according to UN investigators. https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-investigators By using cluster munitions that don't distinguish between combatants and civilians, performing executions, torture, etc.
    I find it weird people assume there's always a good guy and a bad guy in every conflict. The bad guys tend to fight each other. Hasn't everything from Disney cartoons to fantasy novels taught us that? But people don't to apply that to real life. No, all the good guys are friends so all the bad guys must be, too.

  18. #1258
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Russia is still defying sanctions by trading with China.

    Bloomberg

    Japan Times

    And that apparently includes machinery and electronics. Early in the war, lots of articles reported that Russian imports of technological goods like machinery, cars, and electronics had plummeted. But China is apparently filling that gap, and Chinese businesses are getting better at skirting sanctions. Trade in Yuan, which is outside the purview of the United States, has surged. Al Jazeera

    I couldn't find anything concerning trade in microchips, though. Chinese chips aren't as good as Western ones, although they're getting there. They've developed a ~5nm transistor design but still lack in the ability to miniaturize transistors to that level (Al Jazeera) and have to rely on Taiwan. I'd love to find out more about Chinese CPU architectures (how good is their simultaneous multithreading, SIMD, etc.).
    Last edited by xerx; 09-23-2022 at 10:46 PM. Reason: clarification

  19. #1259
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm completely out of my depth when it comes to Euromaidan (I haven't read a single book about it), don't fully understand the events that surrounded Euromaidan or their legality/illegality, and cautious about believing anything that turns out to be a wild conspiracy theory.

    But we do have evidence (a leaked telephone call involving Victoria Nuland, a neoconservative member of the Obama administration) that American officials did conspire to hand-pick Ukraine's new government in the aftermath. Considering the scrutiny directed at alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 American election (is there even any conclusive evidence that Russian meddling affected the final result?), attempted American meddling in Ukraine should have raised the same questions and concerns. (Other source).

    This CATO article on Euromadian can be opinionated, and I don't know enough to decide whether or not its accusatory tone is justified, but I enjoyed reading it anyway. (In case anyone asks, I'm not a libertarian or fan of CATO in any way.)

    Quote Originally Posted by CATO article
    Nuland and Pyatt were engaged in such planning at a time when Yanukovych was still Ukraine’s lawful president. It was startling to have diplomatic representatives of a foreign country—and a country that routinely touts the need to respect democratic processes and the sovereignty of other nations—to be scheming about removing an elected government and replacing it with officials meriting U.S. approval.

    Washington’s conduct not only constituted meddling, it bordered on micromanagement. At one point, Pyatt mentioned the complex dynamic among the three principal opposition leaders, Yatsenyuk, Oleh Tyahnybok, and Vitali Klitschko. Both Pyatt and Nuland wanted to keep Tyahnybok and Klitschko out of an interim government. In the former case, they worried about his extremist ties; in the latter, they seemed to want him to wait and make a bid for office on a longer‐​term basis. Nuland stated that “I don’t think Klitsch should go into the government. I don’t think it’s necessary.” She added that what Yatseniuk needed “is Klitsch and Tyanhybok on the outside.”
    The Ukraine that eventually resulted chose to move closer to NATO and the United States. And to the extent that American meddling existed and was successful, that choice didn't arise entirely organically from the suggested fear of Russian imperialism. It came about by the artificial amplification of select political interests within Ukrainian society.
    Last edited by xerx; 09-25-2022 at 06:32 AM. Reason: clarification

  20. #1260
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A former US army field artillery officer wrote a short article about the effectiveness of Iranian drones, based on his experience in Iraq.

    With such capabilities and functions in mind, it is also important to recognize the unique challenges these drones pose in the area of force protection. First, they are exceptionally hard to track on radar, as they do not share the characteristics of the manned aircraft most modern air defense systems were designed for. Due to their small radar cross-section, relatively slow speed, and low altitude, drones present a unique challenge. They require the use of specific technologies that allow air defenders to identify the drones based on the above characteristics. Second, even if Ukrainian forces can manage to identify and track Iranian UAS systems, they are hard to shoot down for the same reasons they are hard to find on radar: They are not manned aircraft, and most air defense systems weren’t designed to shoot them down.

    ...

    An Asymmetric Threat

    While American forces in the Middle East have had more recent success defending against Iranian drones, it was a long learning curve to develop competent C-UAS strategies and adapt existing weapons and technologies to meet the threat. The situations of American forces in the Middle East and the Ukrainian army are not comparable whatsoever. American forces in Iraq and Syria have the luxury of being in fixed, static defensive positions where they are almost entirely focused on force protection. This allows them to emplace necessary air defenses and to have assets and personnel fully dedicated to C-UAS operations at all times. The Ukrainians do not have that luxury. They are engaged in a completely different style of warfare, one where UAS is only one threat on a long list of Russian artillery, rockets, missiles, aircraft, ships, and maneuver forces.
    They aren't a laughing stock, apparently, and Iran is emerging as a major player in the production of asymmetric weapons.

    Here's the brochure, straight from the Iranian press: (1, 2)

    Also: (3)

  21. #1261
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I want the US to stay out of this mess. Why are we sticking our nose in all of this? Lesson learned don’t be so willing to share highly destructive weapons of mass destruction should they fall into the hands of maniacs not to bring everyone into equal stance but rather to hold the world to hostage
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 09-25-2022 at 06:50 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  22. #1262
    Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    2,790
    Mentioned
    188 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerx View Post
    I'm completely out of my depth when it comes to Euromaidan (I haven't read a single book about it), don't fully understand the events that surrounded Euromaidan or their legality/illegality, and cautious about believing anything that turns out to be a wild conspiracy theory.

    But we do have evidence (a leaked telephone call involving Victoria Nuland, a neoconservative member of the Obama administration) that American officials did conspire to hand-pick Ukraine's new government in the aftermath. Considering the scrutiny directed at alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 American election (is there even any conclusive evidence that Russian meddling affected the final result?), attempted American meddling in Ukraine should have raised the same questions and concerns. (Other source).

    This CATO article on Euromadian can be opinionated, and I don't know enough to decide whether or not its accusatory tone is justified, but I enjoyed reading it anyway. (In case anyone asks, I'm not a libertarian or fan of CATO in any way.)



    The Ukraine that eventually resulted chose to move closer to NATO and the United States. And to the extent that American meddling existed and was successful, that choice didn't arise entirely organically from the suggested fear of Russian imperialism. It came about by the artificial amplification of select political interests within Ukrainian society.
    @xerx Idk what happened (I wasn’t there) but apparently there’s more to the cookie/phone call story - https://www.thebulwark.com/what-real...nd-since-then/

  23. #1263
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    Russian mobilization is going well. All according to plan.

    https://nitter.net/bigSAC10/status/1...918586888192#m
    . The body bag manufacturers are having a field day.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  24. #1264
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    What do Russia, Tucker Carlson, Scott Ritter, Douglas Macgregor, and Trump all have in common?


    Julia Davis

    @JuliaDavisNews
    Some things never change: translated clips of Tucker Carlson are still an ever-present feature on Russian state TV, rivaled only by those of Scott Ritter, Douglas Macgregor and Trump.

    https://nitter.net/JuliaDavisNews/st...483935248384#m
    .

  25. #1265
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    I want the US to stay out of this mess. Why are we sticking our nose in all of this?

    Lesson learned don’t be so willing to share highly destructive weapons of mass destruction should they fall into the hands of maniacs not to bring everyone into equal stance but rather to hold the world to hostage
    @Beautiful sky, humans are maniacs by default. We're easily the most dangerous creature on the planet, both to ourselves and to every other creature alive. Politics is what we use to KEEP from killing everyone else.

    Graffiti in St. Petersburg: "You were indifferent to politics and now you're cannon fodder."

    https://nitter.net/andersostlund/sta...698502029312#m

  26. #1266
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    A response from police prohibiting access to a lawyer seeking his detained client : “After September 21st, laws no longer apply”

    Lol. In Russia, laws never applied. Only the Tsar's wishes apply.

    The thing is, 40% of every population likes it this way. I'm talking to you, Tucker.

    https://nitter.net/ABarbashin/status...991060520962#m

  27. #1267

    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Russia
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    I want the US to stay out of this mess. Why are we sticking our nose in all of this? Lesson learned don’t be so willing to share highly destructive weapons of mass destruction should they fall into the hands of maniacs not to bring everyone into equal stance but rather to hold the world to hostage
    You can't stay out by because your government is the one who orchestrated all this mess.

    The US has a large debt that needs to be serviced by constantly refinancing. When debt rates are high, investors are willing to buy bonds because they know that when new bond rates start to fall, old bonds will rise in price. When the rate is low and everyone expects it to rise, no one wants to buy US bonds, because it is obvious that during a recession rates on new debt will rise and old bonds will become cheaper. The only way to get Europeans to invest in America during a recession is to create a crisis in Europe. Therefore, at the end of each credit cycle, the US government provokes some kind of crisis in Eurasia, so that the crisis is there and not here.

    Obviously you are not responsible for politicians, and I say this not to blame you, but in order for you to look at things soberly.

    It's amazing that people in this thread perceive global crisis as some kind of sports match (Adam, I'm looking at you). Well, amazing discoveries await them next year.

  28. #1268
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurt Gabin View Post
    You can't stay out by because your government is the one who orchestrated all this mess.

    The US has a large debt that needs to be serviced by constantly refinancing. When debt rates are high, investors are willing to buy bonds because they know that when new bond rates start to fall, old bonds will rise in price. When the rate is low and everyone expects it to rise, no one wants to buy US bonds, because it is obvious that during a recession rates on new debt will rise and old bonds will become cheaper. The only way to get Europeans to invest in America during a recession is to create a crisis in Europe. Therefore, at the end of each credit cycle, the US government provokes some kind of crisis in Eurasia, so that the crisis is there and not here.

    Obviously you are not responsible for politicians, and I say this not to blame you, but in order for you to look at things soberly.

    It's amazing that people in this thread perceive global crisis as some kind of sports match (Adam, I'm looking at you). Well, amazing discoveries await them next year.
    @Kurt Gabin, I definitely don't look at the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a sports match.


    "Well, amazing discoveries await them next year." Is this what you have been told? Because I just read "A Roadside Picnic", a philosophical science fiction novel by Soviet-Russian authors Arkady and Boris Strugatsky, written in 1971. It is quite good, and a theme running through the novel is that, amidst the dystopia and senseless death and misery and pettiness of every day life, "amazing discoveries next year" are promised. Lol.

    That was fifty years ago. Evidently, the Russian government's story hasn't changed since then.


    Incidentally, you don't understand the US bond market. The US is a sovereign country; it prints money, so it has no need to borrow. US government bonds are merely a gift to some rich investors to give them a guaranteed return.

    Company bonds are a different matter. Companies can't print their own currency.

    Furthermore, the value of a nation's currency, compared to other nations' currencies, is a measure of how much confidence that the holder of the currency has in the country's ability to provide something of value in the future in exchange for that piece of paper.
    The US dollar is currently rising compared to every other major currency. That tells me that people are betting that the US will be able to provide them in the future with something more valuable than any other country can provide, and that the US does not really have any problems with getting people to accept the dollars that it prints.

    The bottom line is, the US doesn't need to get Europeans to invest in the US. If anything, the US would like to see happy and contented consumers in every country, who can afford to buy US products. Every capitalist country wants that.
    Except Russia, and a few other imperialist countries with empires. The US crushed the British empire because empires are not as good for everyone (except the king or the Tsar) as capitalist countries, and I would think that more people would realize this.

    Incidentally, Kurt, have you mobilized yet?

    https://nitter.net/francis_scarr/sta...060989390849#m

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...049665538.html

    https://nitter.net/officejjsmart/sta...676424495105#m
    .
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-25-2022 at 04:12 PM.

  29. #1269

    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Russia
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    >>it prints money

    And this is exactly what led to inflation and higher rates when printed money was distributed in the form of benefits during covid

    >>so it has no need to borrow

    At all?) How convenient, perhaps you even patented a perpetual motion machine?

    >>The US dollar is currently rising compared to every other major currency. That tells me that people are betting that the US will be able to provide them in the future with something more valuable than any other country can provide, and that the US does not really have any problems with getting people to accept the dollars that it prints.

    Of course, when Europe is in crisis, dollar is rising.. Because capital is fleeing from the collapsed euro

    >>If anything, the US would like to see happy and contented consumers in every country, who can afford to buy US products.

    It would be great, but instead, the United States has a trade deficit and, as a result, growing external debt.

    >>Incidentally, Kurt, have you mobilized yet?

    Nope. Now they are mobilizing those who have experience in combat operations or have concluded a special contract with the Ministry of Defense. This is called a reserve, according to official information, there are two million people in it – 10 times more than number of contractors currently used in Ukraine. In addition to the reserve, there is also a standby (IDK how to translate this correctly, but you get the point) – all other physically and mentally healthy men, about thirty million people. These thirty millions are divided into three stages, I am in the second and it is unlikely that my participation will be required. And, in general, I expect that now that Russia has a multiple advantage on the side, Kyiv will finally agree to start negotiations.

  30. #1270
    DogOfDanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    492
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    On one hand... we say that global warming is a bigger threat than nuclear war (global warming isn't even the most important environmental problem, pollution / habitat destruction is), at the same time... we say that capitalism is the greatest benefit to all, despite the fact it primarily drives the market & the resulting pollution, and this seems to justify toppling various communist governments throughout the years.

  31. #1271
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurt Gabin View Post
    >>it prints money

    And this is exactly what led to inflation and higher rates when printed money was distributed in the form of benefits during covid
    Every major country in the world is experiencing higher inflation. Even the ones which didn't print money for benefits during covid.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurt Gabin View Post
    >>so it has no need to borrow

    At all?) How convenient, perhaps you even patented a perpetual motion machine?
    Capitalism is a man-made system, not a natural law, so the first and second laws of thermodynamics do not apply. Yes, it is possible to print money forever.

    Why would a country that can print money need to borrow it from its citizens? It can just print more.
    Technically, a sovereign country doesn't need to tax, either, for the same reason, but they do tax, not because they need their paper back, but because taxing gives the paper value. You need to have it on April 15, or they put you in jail.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurt Gabin View Post
    >>The US dollar is currently rising compared to every other major currency. That tells me that people are betting that the US will be able to provide them in the future with something more valuable than any other country can provide, and that the US does not really have any problems with getting people to accept the dollars that it prints.

    Of course, when Europe is in crisis, dollar is rising.. Because capital is fleeing from the collapsed euro
    Capital must also be fleeing from the collapsed British pound, the collapsed Japanese yen, the collapsed Indian Rupee, the collapsed Chinese Yuan, and a few other currencies. Perhaps there is a US-induced crisis in all of these countries.
    Or could it be that people just think that US prospects for the future are good?
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurt Gabin View Post

    >>If anything, the US would like to see happy and contented consumers in every country, who can afford to buy US products.

    It would be great, but instead, the United States has a trade deficit and, as a result, growing external debt.
    Well, this is complicated, but the US is not harmed by this. Or you could simply say that the rest of the world is willing to stack up dollars in exchange for the right to export goods to the States.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kurt Gabin View Post

    >>Incidentally, Kurt, have you mobilized yet?

    Nope. Now they are mobilizing those who have experience in combat operations or have concluded a special contract with the Ministry of Defense. This is called a reserve, according to official information, there are two million people in it – 10 times more than number of contractors currently used in Ukraine. In addition to the reserve, there is also a standby (IDK how to translate this correctly, but you get the point) – all other physically and mentally healthy men, about thirty million people. These thirty millions are divided into three stages, I am in the second and it is unlikely that my participation will be required.
    Well, I genuinely hope that you don't have to go fight in Ukraine. I've seen a lot of pictures recently of Russian soldiers lying in pools of blood and mud in Ukraine. No one wants to die that way.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurt Gabin View Post
    And, in general, I expect that now that Russia has a multiple advantage on the side, Kyiv will finally agree to start negotiations.
    What do you think Ukraine should negotiate for, seeing as how Ukraine was invaded by Russia?

    What would you negotiate for, if some country invaded Russia? Do Ukrainians have the same rights as Russians to be free of invasions from other countries?

  32. #1272
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Looks like Putin has succeeded in mobilizing over a quarter million young men in Russia. They mobilized themselves right out of Russia.

    https://nitter.net/carlbildt/status/...974317219845#m

  33. #1273
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    2,999
    Mentioned
    130 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    nato abuses sad bald bully man into attacking innocent blond-haired, blue-eyed wheat farmers

    America gets to look like hero again and the mic gets to fuck your bitch renewed for the next 50 years

    And then people complain about technocracy as if it's inferior to republicanism and dictatorship

  34. #1274
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    "President Vladimir Putin grants Russian citizenship to former US security contractor Edward Snowden."

    Lucky guy. He can now be conscripted into Russia's mobilization.

    https://nitter.net/seungminkim/statu...krJQISAAA%3D#r


    Maybe Trump can get the same deal. Please?

  35. #1275

    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Russia
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    >> What do you think Ukraine should negotiate for, seeing as how Ukraine was invaded by Russia?

    Apparently, you still have not familiarized yourself with the history of this conflict and do not understand what is going on, so here is the whole story

    In the early 1990s, the Soviet Union collapsed and its republics became separate states. Among other things, they had to decide whether they were going to maintain their previous economic ties or develop relations with other countries. Until 2014, Russia remained the main trading partner of Ukraine. By the way, even now, right during the war, they manage to trade with us and Russia remains the third largest market for their exports.

    In the 2000s, they began to discuss whether they should join the European Union. Russia, of course, did not like this, but no one forbade them to do this, and they even agreed on a plan to join the EU until 2018.

    Now back to economics. The main products of Ukraine are steel, coal and grain. In the 2000s, the Chinese Party set a goal to increase steel production, and the Chinese exceeded the target so much that steel and coal prices collapsed. Because of this, by 2013, the Ukrainian economy was in a difficult state and they even had a deflation.

    In the same year, their government was conducting regular negotiations on joining the EU, but officials from the EU were not very interested in accepting more beggars for maintenance and put forward additional requirements for the government of Ukraine.

    Against the backdrop of a difficult economic situation, this became an opportunity for opposition nationalist parties to make a revolution and overthrow the old government. Since then, the government of Ukraine has been a mixture of nationalists and populists. They began to give out promises about how great it will be to live when Ukraine joins the EU and NATO. But at the same time, they remembered what they did to the previous government and understood that in the future they would have to explain why the EU did not want to accept them. They found a very simple explanation: the white master does not want to accept us, because the evil Russians do not let us go.

    The latter was rather stupid, especially in terms of the promises to join NATO, since Russia and Ukraine had a lease agreement for a military base in Crimea, which allows to control the entire Black Sea.

    The military does not understand such jokes, they thought "What if these idiots are really taken to NATO?" And in 2014, the Russian army just came and took this base along with the entire Crimea.

    In addition, as Ukraine, previously viewed as an ally by Russia, has become unpredictable and hostile neighbor, Russia has supported several separatist movements in Ukraine's border areas with it. It was assumed that when they achieved the status of republics, they would have a veto in the Ukrainian parliament and thus be able to block the most dangerous ideas of the new government.

    After a short military conflict, the situation with these republics was frozen and agreed to be resolved through diplomacy. This is how the Minsk Agreements appeared.

    Everything remained in this state for almost eight years. Until 2019, the president of Ukraine was the oligarch Poroshenko, who had something to lose. But you haven't forgotten about the populists yet, right? In May 2019, Ukrainians voted for comedian and actor Zelensky. It was the most foolish election campaign in history: politicians and oligarchs found this poor artist and made a series about how he becomes president and punishes politicians and oligarchs. Ukrainians watched this series and... believed!

    In 2021, when inflation problems began in the United States and ratings began to fall, Americans showed up to this circus. The Ukrainian government was promised support in the confrontation against Russia, so they happily tore up the Minsk Agreements and rallied to clean up the separatist republics through military action. From October 2021, they began to demand that Russia refuse to support these republics. At the same time, the United States imposed more and more sanctions, so that in the end Putin just went crazy with the number of them and said, “WTF! If the US has already imposed sanctions, and Ukraine is going to take these republics by force, then what do I have to lose?"

    I am not defending our Darkest Lord, but we need to assess the situation objectively and understand that there is no way that Ukraine will win anything in this war. In fact, there is no longer such a country as Ukraine, its politicians have destroyed it. Every third citizen left the country, the rest survive and pray that it all ends, GDP has fallen DOUBLE, their politicians have sold their grain to the West, so in winter the country will face hunger (obviously, this year Ukrainian farmers did not sow anything)... And how will they fight with Russia? Do you really think that a poor country whose name translates as "Outskirts" and which was the outskirts of the Soviet Union, after which it was plundered by constantly changing groups for two decades, has anything other than Soviet weapons of the 70s? And who will fight? I have already mentioned the numbers, you can estimate the alignment of forces. 200,000 men against a militarized country that has 10 times as many soldiers in reserve alone and 150 times as many if it goes all out? Against the world's second largest arms manufacturer? Who you want they fight for? For a comedian? For the oligarchs?

    Therefore, it is obvious that the negotiations will be about anything Putin wants.

    >>What would you negotiate for, if some country invaded Russia? Do Ukrainians have the same rights as Russians to be free of invasions from other countries?

    Unfortunately, politicians have no morals, and in such a situation it makes no sense to talk in such categories. The only good thing they did in this war was to reduce the number of injured civilians to a minimum. Although, wait, there is still a moral here: don't vote for actors, they are not better presidents than artists.

  36. #1276
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    @xerx Idk what happened (I wasn’t there) but apparently there’s more to the cookie/phone call story - https://www.thebulwark.com/what-real...nd-since-then/
    A'ight, I'll need to read more about the subject. It's pointless to have an opinion about stuff like this without doing (lots of) research.

    It's entirely possible that Nuland's telephone conversation was completely taken out of context. I also know for a fact that Yanukovich was indeed voted out of office by the Ukrainian parliament following Euromaidan, not somehow removed at gunpoint, and that his removal wasn't necessarily illegal (although, again, I'm out of my depth when discussing the legality and legitimacy of this move).


    But I'm going to look for a more objective source. This author seems biased, and she glosses over some things when dismissing Donetsk and Luhansk's case for independence:

    She describes the Donbass republics as "gangster states", citing their criminality and corruption (I can believe this, and I somewhat doubt that these problems will be quickly solved by joining Russia). But it isn't immediately obvious that their criminality and corruption were far outside the norm compared to other parts of Ukraine, in case that's her implication. And even if they were criminal and corrupt, I don't see why a region's internal problems would affect its legal case for independence under international law.

    She says that the rest of Ukraine, including its Russian-speaking regions (which also disapproved of the post-Euromaidan government), were opposed to the secession of the Luhansk and Donetsk republics. But she doesn't provide legal reasons for why one region's disapproval would negate another region's case for independence. In a recent instance, the International Court of Justice ruled that Kosovo (which was also in conflict with the Serbian central government and barred from independence under Serbian law) was legally allowed, under international law, to unilaterally declare independence from Serbia (1). I don't know for sure if these (and other) cases for independence are similar, but it seems like an important question to tackle.

    When discussing the war in Donbass, she condemns but glosses over Ukraine's rocket attacks in populated areas (2). She says that these crimes "cannot compare" to the "criminality and lawlessness" of the Donbass republics, but she never justifies this. The killing of civilians, however intentional or unintentional, doesn't seem trivial, and it certainly can compare unfavourably to criminality and lawlessness. It's possible to invoke her logic for justifying Russia's invasion of Ukraine, citing the fact that Ukraine is a corrupt country that's controlled by oligarchs.

  37. #1277
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Russian air supremacy isn't a thing for some reason. This article gives an interesting viewpoint (defence news) as to why. Among other things, Russian reconnaissance is god-awful (not enough reconnaissance drones; Russian satellite imagery is slow and blurry), meaning that the Russian air force can only attack known targets. Russian pilots stay away from Ukrainian airspace for that reason.

    Russian milbloggers (the few that I read, anyway) periodically freak out about the lack of good reconnaissance.

    Ukraine, on the other hand, has great reconnaissance (NATO-tier).
    Last edited by xerx; 09-27-2022 at 06:05 PM.

  38. #1278
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    8,044
    Mentioned
    217 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Once the Russian-occupied regions finish their referendums (is there any doubt that they'll vote to become part of Russia? lol), I don't suppose that Russia will agree to cede them back to Ukraine. Ukraine's public stance is that it intends to liberate all captured territories. Is there still any hope for a negotiated peace at this point, or is one side just going to have to win decisively?

  39. #1279
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerx View Post
    Once the Russian-occupied regions finish their referendums (is there any doubt that they'll vote to become part of Russia? lol), I don't suppose that Russia will agree to cede them back to Ukraine. Ukraine's public stance is that it intends to liberate all captured territories. Is there still any hope for a negotiated peace at this point, or is one side just going to have to win decisively?

    I really don't understand why people think that a negotiated peace is in Ukraine's favor. Look at the history of treaties and promises between Russia and Ukraine. The only treaty that Russia ever kept was the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.
    @xerx, you're in Canada, correct? What if the US military just rolled into Ontario, flattened the cities, killed men, women, and children indiscriminately, then held a "referendum" which said that Ontario is now part of the US, and the men there have to join the army to fight the other provinces?

    Plus, you Canadians don't speak American.

    What would you want to negotiate?
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-27-2022 at 06:59 PM.

  40. #1280
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some people say that Russians should be allowed to travel to other countries, because denying an escape route from Russia would harm the "good" Russians.

    Other people say that closing the borders and keeping the "good" Russians in their own country just might force them to take action against their present government, assuming that they don't actually like it, and aren't just fleeing to avoid getting killed in Putin's war of imperialism.

    Let's hear what the Russians themselves say: https://nitter.net/Fella_Tuga/status...772367704067#m

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •