SEi why do you cry easily?
I have balls. I don’t cry easily. I’m stoic as F. I’ll find a way to solve my problems
SEi why do you cry easily?
I have balls. I don’t cry easily. I’m stoic as F. I’ll find a way to solve my problems
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
They're very emotional and sensitive. The slightest physical or emotional disturbance pains them! I speak from experience: half the time if I hug my girlfriend, she'll complain that I hurt her. If I use Ne absurdism in a joke, she'll try to make sense of it and become physically nervous or get headaches. If I very lightly rib her, she'll get emotional and ask why I'm insulting her.
SEIs are simply built delicately, and must be taken care of lest they fall apart.
In comparison to EII, SEI wear their emotions on their sleeve. They can cry when they are sad or happy. People can tell what kind of mood I’m in whether I am sad when I walk in the room. SEI are more outwardly emotional than I am. Their gloom is gloomy, their responses are come in cursing. My emotions pull inwards. I come in quiet.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
yes they do but not everyone can be as ballsy as an EII.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Wtf you just made this thread because Minde said she cries easily. This is so petty even for you, Maritsa.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
"I have balls" - it looks like it
What the hell Maritsa- are you trying to use ironic humor or be sarcastic or sth? Didn't Scapegrace make you cry all the time on here and you would always complain about how mean ppl were or something lol.
Everyone pick your ball size from the above image.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Last edited by Bento; 04-16-2019 at 07:43 PM. Reason: typo in 'says'