Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Noomi Rapace

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    153
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Noomi Rapace

    What do you think her type is?



    Last edited by Clumsy; 06-02-2012 at 03:55 AM.

  2. #2
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Fi-ENFp. Reminds me of several IEEs I've known in real life.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    153
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    Fi-ENFp. Reminds me of several IEEs I've known in real life.
    What about her reminds you of IEEs you've known?

  4. #4
    High Priestess glam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,371
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    love her pink shirt in the second interview.

  5. #5
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well aside from sheer vibe, in that first video she speaks in such a scattered way like her mind is jumping from place to place and struggling to stay on track. I definitely see this in myself, and it seems indicative of a Result-type mindset. The way she moves around strikes me as extrovert + static, in that she sort of jumps from a moment of higher energy to lower and back again in these discrete bursts. This leaves ENFp + ESTp, and I don't see her as speaking in terms of discrete qualia about the world around her, opting for more generalizations instead of specific instances of sensory awareness, and she seems to have great difficulty in expressing real-world actualizations of what she's describing. Look at when she's describing Robert Downey Jr., whole wheelbarrow full of abstracted impressions about the guy but almost nothing describing specific instances of his character.

  6. #6
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bump

  7. #7
    wasp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    TIM
    ZGM
    Posts
    1,578
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    i love her

  8. #8
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    noomi is a cool name

  9. #9
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wasp View Post
    i love her
    You think she might be delta, then?

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    275
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ESI all the way.

  11. #11
    wasp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    TIM
    ZGM
    Posts
    1,578
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    You think she might be delta, then?
    i don't know actually, but she's a lot softer than rooney mara, who i think might be gamma, even her portrayal of lisbeth salander (gamma) was "lighter" in comparison. rooney mara was who i had in mind when i re-read the books because she seemed to understand lisbeth salander on a more intrinsic level. i haven't found as many interviews of noomi rapace commenting on her experiences playing lisbeth salander, but you can even see this contrast in how they relay their individual experiences, it seems like there's an integral part of lisbeth salander's experiences which are lost on noomi rapace, for one reason or another, whereas i recall rooney mara expressing constant indignation over how misunderstood she felt the character was, which i agreed with.

    anyway i don't know where people are getting esi from, plus sometimes i just like to find excuses to talk about the millenium series

  12. #12
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's somebody around here that I think is the same type as this woman.

  13. #13
    wasp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    TIM
    ZGM
    Posts
    1,578
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lavos View Post
    There's somebody around here that I think is the same type as this woman.
    who

  14. #14
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wasp View Post
    who
    Use your imagination.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    ESE

  16. #16
    lavos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside the Windfish's egg
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    1,703
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    ESE
    Nope. But not a bad guess.
    Last edited by lavos; 04-10-2018 at 06:25 PM.

  17. #17
    bye now
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,888
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glam View Post
    love her pink shirt in the second interview.
    noooo, it's so tacky.
    good bye

  18. #18
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,160
    Mentioned
    305 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag 2 View Post
    I thiink she seems D, yes.
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @hag 2

    Ola Rapace - EIE

    > Duality doesn't always happen in marriages, but odds are good in 10yr marriages it's one of the most-common ones

    It mb "one of the most-common ones", but anyway to have low % of pairs (alike 10%), including stable ones. As many important factors take part.

  20. #20
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,671
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @hag 2 yeah could be

  21. #21
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


  22. #22
    &papu silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,077
    Mentioned
    456 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag 2 View Post
    IEI?
    @Sol @Viktor

    D?
    @Troll Nr 007 @Tallmo

    Interested in your thoughts as well: @silke <3. If not IEI, pls provide video example comparisons or names at least if any pop to mind.
    Is she your Dual?: @sbbds

    Duality doesn't always happen in marriages, but odds are good in 10yr marriages it's one of the most-common ones, and it's hard for me to VIsualize her ex-husband as anything other than SLE.
    Not IEI. If you're looking for some examples she is similar to, see pics of Paul Simon, Gal Gadot, Andy Warhol, and very distantly Sasha Grey - all four Si-leads.

    I'd type her as SEI 6w5 sx/sp, the strong sx 'seducer' subtype. Her ex-husband VI's like an LSI so/sx, so it was a "benefit" marriage between them where she was 2x his benefactor.


  23. #23
    &papu silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    5,077
    Mentioned
    456 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hag 2 View Post
    ic. I suspected IEI because in some random vid she went detailed into psychological undercurrents, which is not an Si but is an Ni thing, and in an artful/abstract/removed from reality way further lending to Ni-not-Si. However, I only watched 10 or so seconds and 5 seconds or so of some video here, then instantly closed the video out of repelled disinterest (this is how I react to female IEIs, except for you). But SEI? When I get home I'll more diligently look.
    I don't particularly see how an interest in psychology would be related to IEIs? This forum is much about psych, in a way of understanding yourself and others, and we have had people of every type register here.

  24. #24
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,671
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah I think SEI (not IEI) is reasonable for her too. Too grounded.

  25. #25
    roger557's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,122
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bump!

    SEE-Fi?

  26. #26
    The Morning Star EUDAEMONIUM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    gone
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,130
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IEE is my guess.
    The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.

    The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •