Cognitive types and ITR

[Tigerfadder]

There are those 3 dichtonomies; Static–Dynamic Positivism–Negativism
Evolution–Involution
How are from these duals and other ITR related? Is there a connection or pattern how ITR work with this?

[Desert Financial]

Is there a connection or pattern how ITR work with this?

I think so.

[Desert Financial]

IME,

VS type proposes hypotheses and tests them. HP sees the whole experiment, identifies the salient points, and cuts the wheat from the chaff. VS type proposes hypotheses and tests them, etc. The net result is that the conversation generates the most relevant and thoroughly tested explanations for observations.

DA type proposes a two sided issue. CD sees the issue, identifies the underlying causes, and develops an explanation. DA type synthesizes the response into another two sided issue. The net result is that the conversation generates cause-effect explanations with many angles taken into consideration.

Concerning the 3 dichotomies, ITR between duals tend to create balance. Between positivists and negativists, ideas and projects neither undershoot or overshoot. Between involution types and evolution types, ideas and projects neither become hyperfocused or overly distracted. Between static types and dynamic types, projects and ideas don't become too flexible or too rigid. Line up all 3 dichotomies for a lot of payoff.