I hope my boyfriend will detour with me or pick me up hitchhiking in your neighborhoodOriginally Posted by William
I hope my boyfriend will detour with me or pick me up hitchhiking in your neighborhood
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I overdo it
Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings
Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja
As a newbie what do you think my type is from observing my typing style? Double use of ''type'' in my post.
knowing nothing about you, and judging the vibe off of your avatar, I want to say SLI, LIE, or EII. Totally throwin that out of my ass.
Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings
Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja
@mikemex
so I'm Ti polr?
Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings
Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja
Nowhere does it say being SLE means you're amoral. It means you take in through the senses, which are highly acute and aware.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
what you say seems completely irrelevant to what you quoted. as much as i think church is bullshit, it attracts all types.
Not being on this list makes me sad.
This is Se...listen to the way he talks about the food...the senses the experience of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5JKvQF_H34
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Who doesn't "take in through the senses"?
Intuitors take in through drugs and free association. Fact.
Some better and more than others
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Rob a my Villain SLI confirm and final.
@Saberstorm SLI and final.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Rob a my Villian, trululu.Rob a my Villain SLI confirm and final.
You're snitching again. Some things in life do not change at all.
Hey, @Ankh, you SLE witch you. This is what I have been talking about and this is the snitch. There is many snicthes like him on this forum.
Yes, @SillyprsonthenameIhaveforgotwhotypedmeSLEIcouldn'tcarel essabout, I facking should play the lottery.
@William, you fail at basic criminal law. No offence.
Last edited by Absurd; 02-05-2014 at 01:52 PM.
This is not the kind of response I was waiting for, but...
I thought I'm going to get like a free sample of Ananke tearing people apart, but no...
@Ryene Astraelis
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Attention whoring thread fail.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
rat1: IEI
Eliza: ESE
final and confirmed.
Can I be, IEI-EII-SEI (and a little ILI) puleeze?
Of course anything you say will be confirmed and final. I accept that risk.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I only had one interaction with Eliza and I agree with you fully. NOT my fucking dual.
she still wouldn't be your dual any way around...she's a delta
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I agree with @Johannes Bloem that she is an ESE. However, I disagree with his typing me LII. He was a little bit pressing on this issue for my liking.
nah, she ain't alpha. I like ESE's. Don't think you're alpha either. LII's react differently to me usually. So, in this case, I'm not agreeing with JoBro.
Nah bruh, pretty sure Saberstorm is Beta NF@Saberstorm LSE final final final final final
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@rowdyness
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
He ( I don't whether he is a woman or she is a man any more - never mind) was on your list LSE for sure, Maritsa. Times, they are a changing.@rowdyness
Hmm..., Spacegrape is definitely SLE not IEI, Maritsa...
Maritsa EII
Silke EII
Lungs ESI
Scapegrace ILI
FGD LIE
Narc LIE
Director Abbie LSE
Criscorey - IEI
Zero ILI
Phantom Shadow ILI
Within LII / ILI
Jimmers ILI
Ananke SLE
Leader SLE
Ath ILE / SLE
C-Pig ILI - Te
Refi ILE
Woobie ILI / ILE
Daft Punk LSE
Mercutio SLE
Eldanen IEI - Ni
Yellow Hat IEI
Aivo IEI - Fe
Sigh SEI
Lemontress SEI
Sarinana EIE
Saberstorm LII
Heretic W EII
Kim IEE
Dutchman LSI - Se
Absurd Beta ST (SLE)
William LSE / ESE
Thank you, Maritsa...
Can I get a confirm on it?
Johannes Bloem IEE
Ryenne Astralis ESI /EII
Xerx ILE
McBain EIE (?)
Invisible Jim - ILI (?)
Ashton (SLI) ISTp Confirm
Azeroffs (SLI) ISTp Confirm
Absurd- (SLI) ISTp Confirm
Agarina -(SEI) ISFp Confirm
bluehenrybob- who is this?
Christian Bale -
laghlagh- (SEE) ESFp Confirm
Kassie/Lungs - (ESI) ISFj Confirm
InvisibleJim -(???) Annoying type
All Dutchess are LSI. No need to ask. Especially when a social cripple with father complex passes the judgement.
for Dutchman - see the derail - "how to recognize information elements in quotes" (in General Soc. Discussion probably) . When he showed up I started to self-type as Ni ego. (after that discussion)
here it is : http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...n-quotes-split
Hahaha, I knew you're Ti dom, Ash.
EDIT: I wonder whether there is more Ni people as you claim for yourself doing theoretical science on a Socionics forum...
EDIT#2: I wonder as well whether you changing of types doesn't make you biased at all. I think it does. Heavily.
EDIT#3: It is interesting you "just" go terraformed by two self-typed Beta ST in that thread you linked (didn't see it before), for they didn't buy your theories.
I can be wrong of course...
Last edited by Absurd; 02-19-2014 at 05:43 PM.
Posting Permissions
