.
.
Last edited by theticalanti; 06-18-2016 at 05:39 PM.
fuck off
Is this for real or someone trolling as him? In case its real, welcome back!
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
I'm oh so shocked.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Fuck yeah, trolling material
ESE>LSE
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Frigging knew you would come back in drama after you left in drama.
If you ask me, which you are not lol, you are inviting drama by raising the subject in an introduction thread. Just carry on as normal if you really don't want drama, if anything because you assume people care enough about you to dispute your type when you haven't posted in as how long, which is pretty ridiculous imo.
While I always imagined him as Merry, I can see him being a Te-LSE - in that his role function could be very strong. I think that he could be one, because there are several guys at work that seem very similar to him - and when I imagine them being "process, tactical, farsighted, yielding," it can fit.
He needs to impregnate an EII - that will settle all questions.
Socionics -
the16types.info
But ESEs aren't LSEs. If so it would get very confusing and annoying.
Hi.
Apparently you will have to deal with many or most people (including me) believing you being ESE. "Dealing with" being preferably accepting difference of opinion rather than getting defensive or worried about the whole issue.
lol do you still sell cosmetic scams
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
This isn't exactly a suprise, but I think he's typed right as LSE.
is a bold and contact function in LSE's while for ESE it is a bold and inert function. The base function is characterized by it's influence on one's worldview and a foundation while the role is characterized by "trying".
Imo, his worldview is that of a ego and not a ego, while his actions related to are based in role function interactions socially.
I think he's a contact subtype which would be accentuated .
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...Meged-Ovcharov
He's kinda of stereotypical go-getter rat race get ahead in life individual. I've dealt with a lot of individuals like him, and they all have a similar worldview and behavior.
His is accentuated and he's a real go-getter, just not a logical type. He dabbles in ethical and social matters when he posts on this forum, he doesn't need an Fi-minded individual who will shut out his well-meaning ways and ignore his ideas about people. And trust me Will, LSEs aren't the nice approachable types. They need EIIs to naturally see through their hard, serious exterior and be comfortable with their dry, boring calculations. EIIs will approach anyone without any kind of social grace, just pure water against fire. We were made to melt LSEs, to completely cease their emotions for our own. I don't think you know serious types well enough. Our emotional world is too inaccessible and impulsive for you. You need someone who truly respects Fe, the game, and will stimulate you and help you along in your friendly well-meaning ways.
Anyway, welcome back Will.
Last edited by 717495; 04-09-2013 at 06:52 PM.
Role functions are socially normal, it's irregular and generally unobtrusive. People don't really want to take the lead here but feels a need to appear competent, once that competency is established, they go do something else. Base function has far more stamina. He could be really weird individual and have crazy stamina in his role function but I don't think he's that abnormal.
However his ethical interactions are not constant, he is irregularly in those displays, he doesn't keep those up and imo he is not very secure in his social abilities, but he want to be competent there.
Welcome back