Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 6789101112 LastLast
Results 361 to 400 of 480

Thread: IR test (by Sol)

  1. #361
    Eccentric Neurotic Narcissist andreasdevig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    TIM
    FiNe
    Posts
    220
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Sol Maybe I'll make a video. The test here is interesting, but it takes a long time to do.
    EII-INFj / INFP / Strong E4 and 9 energy / Melancholic-Phlegmatic / Musical-Intrapersonal-Spatial / Kinky-Sensual

  2. #362
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by andreasdevig View Post
    @Sol Maybe I'll make a video. The test here is interesting, but it takes a long time to do.
    The test in the current form is more a supportive method. To show what is more possible between some types.
    For example, IEI/INFP should not be your type according to having SLE on the last place and its subrevisie at top. While EII is significantly more possible.

  3. #363
    divine, too human WVBRY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    TIM
    LSI-C™
    Posts
    6,028
    Mentioned
    237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    edit I'm stupid sorry
    Last edited by WVBRY; 01-13-2019 at 04:33 PM.


  4. #364
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @ToTheMoon 's (results)
    by nonverbal from video was supposed LII

    "Hey, that test was very interesting to take! I grabbed a couple of glimpses of all the videos included and after a moment of debating, came to the conclusion that my top faves would have to be:
    ESFj/ESE - I enjoyed how stable but energetic they were at the same time, and they looked as if they had so much of this combo in them that they could just share it and spread it all over their surroundings. I wish there were more than just two working videos for men of this type, though, two vids were a bit scarce for grasping the general idea of this type.
    INFj/EII - they mesmerized me. Very attractive men. Kinda want to meet each one and talk with them at length to get a better understanding of them (this happens to me sometimes and I usually leave disillusioned when all the mysteries go away ).
    ENFJ/EIE - they look warm and very considerate of others but so much fun at the same time. Didn't look very bright to me though . Which ultimately didn't really matter! (Sorry about that judgment.)
    INFp/IEI - so soothing! They look like they would be very accomodating and able to offer great understanding without being imposing and judgmental.

    I also liked INTj/LII but more like... they're such sweet children, slightly lost in the world, I want to hug them and tell them they'll be alright. Very warm feelings from me.
    [...]
    When I made your test, I noticed my strong negative reaction to IEE, to my surprise. I didn't have this strong a reaction to any other type (except INTp who were just... eww. So disheveled. Kinda scary at that). I wonder what that means. They annoyed me so much. They all looked like they were desperately calling for my attention and/or sympathy, like they needed me to see them and only them. I saw so much faking in them it disturbed me. This could be related to the fact that I saw my old boyfriend in their expressions. Or this could be that I'm in strong denial about myself, if I'm indeed one of them . But I'm pretty convinced that I do and I like myself a lot and I'm pretty aware of the way that I am, so there's that.

    After watching these videos, I can't see IEI for me, I'm definitely not that nice and flowy like they are."

  5. #365
    Hamouchou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Morocco
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So I've finished the test, and here are my results :
    1-EII
    2-EIE
    3-IEE
    4-SLE
    5-ILE
    6-SEE
    7-IEI
    8-LIE
    9-LSE
    10-ESE
    11-SEI
    12-LSI
    13-SLI
    14-ESI
    15-LII
    16-ILI

  6. #366
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Hamouchou

    you prefer FN types as 3/4 of them are in top - 3 first places. this may point on your TS
    the only missing FN is IEI what can be explained that it's superego for SLI - the worst IR. while conflictors on a distance can be perceived positively. as to have superego in top is low possibly, then the situation points on SLI as most possible among TS

    6/8 of your up half are E types and all bottom 4 are I types. So you prefer E types, what points on your introvertion.
    Also most of up half are F (5/8) and N (6/8) types, what with 3 FN at top points on good possibility of TS. Most at up half are P types (5/8), what points on some more for your P.

    SLI's semidual got 5th place - the closest place to top. on 6th place is SLI's mirrage - the type on border between good and neutral IR - it supplements 2nd function. Against LSE besides EIE at top is their semidual at bottom. SLE's semidual is at bottom too.
    The strangest is SLE at top. Mb you had important SLE woman.

    By IR test the most possible types are SLI and lesser for LSI.
    The supposed by VI and by your communication was SLI with assurance by me. The test shows good and main possibility for SLI, some more than for LSI as 2nd variant to think about.

    IR test has worked relatively good on you.
    You need to choose between delta and beta quadras - which values and types are closer, more yours. Your type is SLI, but you need to study and to watch on practice the typology more to understand it.

  7. #367
    Hamouchou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Morocco
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    @Hamouchou
    By IR test the most possible types are SLI and lesser for LSI.
    The supposed by VI and by your communication was SLI with assurance by me. The test shows good and main possibility for SLI, some more than for LSI as 2nd variant to think about.

    IR test has worked relatively good on you.
    You need to choose between delta and beta quadras - which values and types are closer, more yours. Your type is SLI, but you need to study and to watch on practice the typology more to understand it.
    Thanks for your input, I really appreciate it.

  8. #368
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like Dimitry Novoselov- doesn’t show too much emotions and is very informative and serious
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  9. #369
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    The LSI group speak too slowly too involved and I don’t have patience for them. Just get tothe point
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  10. #370
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamouchou View Post
    Thanks for your input, I really appreciate it.
    "TIM SLI"
    try to type people near you to check IR effects with them to be sure. novices sometimes change opinions about own type later. only when you'll see regularly and IRL that IR effects fit to the theory - then you'll have strong basis to trust to concrete your type. also you'll can trust in your typing skills in this case and hence to use the typology in your life

    some % of mistakes will stay, so even when you are sure in someone's type - it's better to watch him for several monthes. if assured opinion stays - then you may make decisions based on the typology.
    it's especially important with typing women for pairs, where emotions make harder to think reasonably. also nontypes factors are important too and needs a time to understand a human better, including when it has good IR for pairs as duality/semiduality/activation. we all understand this, but it needs efforts to follow this and it's useful to remind about this

  11. #371
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    The LSI group speak too slowly too involved and I don’t have patience for them
    extraverts talk faster but more you'd need more patience to hear their opinions
    it's calm introverts who will hear you with more interest. while extraverts have own to say and it's harder for them to be patient to do not interupt an opponent

  12. #372
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    extraverts talk faster but more you'd need more patience to hear their opinions
    it's calm introverts who will hear you with more interest. while extraverts have own to say and it's harder for them to be patient to do not interupt an opponent
    Isthat why I prefer the extrovert?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  13. #373
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Sol
    Why do you have the key here at all. Curious people are always going to check the key. You just put the temptation there by posting it. When I took tests in school I was not given the answers along with it. I found out the answers after I finished the test.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  14. #374
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Sol, don't remove the key!

  15. #375
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    Isthat why I prefer the extrovert?
    He is saying you are the extrovert and that is why you don't have the patience. :/

    it's calm introverts who will hear you with more interest. while extraverts have own to say and it's harder for them to be patient to do not interupt an opponent

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  16. #376
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    @Sol, don't remove the key!
    Why? He can send it to those who have taken his test.

    I know he won't remove the key anyway.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  17. #377
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    Sol, don't remove the key!
    I may change the key periodically with list's updates. But not to remove.

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    Isthat why I prefer the extrovert?
    Quiet people which more hear you, than flood by own speaking what you are harder to hold, - is more about introverts which hence fit to your preferences more.

    If you'd did IR test comletely and without knowing the types there - then it would be rather more significant to describe your preferences.

    Nontypes factors may reduce and distort IR effects in your consciousness.
    You knew the key, about LSI there and also you wish to think yourself EII - so you were predisposed to accent on negative.
    You need to evaluate impressions not directly but to _compare_ 2 groups: E vs I types, - to decide which group is _more_ comfortable for you. Also it's better to do IRL.
    Not by 1-2 humans of a single type by 1-2 clips per every.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Curious people are always going to check the key.
    People which want to do the test correctly will have no problems to do not open the key before it should to be.
    The interests of minority of alike 20% which may have no enough of selfcontrol are lesser important than to leave the possibility to use the test without my assistance. Also, that minority is not expected to have the patience to do the test correctly (takes ~8 hours) - as it needs even more of selfcontrol.

    > You just put the temptation there by posting it.

    the ones following temptations live by instincts, not by thinking about better ways. to use the typology is for more responsible ones

    > When I took tests in school I was not given the answers along with it. I found out the answers after I finished the test.

    Making school tests better than your real skills you did not thought as a problem for you. In other case there should not be a significant problem to do not look at answers page. Also the test is assumed for adults, but not kids with undeveloped psyche to follow the reason.
    In Herbert's "Dune" there is an episode (if I remember it correctly) of a torture by an illusionary pain - proof after achieving mature age. If an aristocrat has good selfcontrol and does not remove the hand - he deserves to live. In other case he should die, being not responsible enough to have the power. Knowledge is the power.
    Last edited by Sol; 03-08-2019 at 05:56 PM.

  18. #378
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post

    Making school tests better than your real skills you did not thought as a problem for you. In other case there should not be a significant problem to do not look at answers page. Also the test is assumed for adults, but not kids with undeveloped psyche to follow the reason.
    In Herbert's "Dune" there is an episode (if I remember it correctly) of a torture by an illusionary pain - proof after achieving mature age. If an aristocrat has good selfcontrol and does not remove the hand - he deserves to live. In other case he should die, being not responsible enough to have the power. Knowledge is the power.

    “I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”


    I know Dune.

    Edit: Adults cheat too. It is naive to think they don't. It is not always about self control. It is about curiosity sometimes. The reason more people do not take your test is because it takes a lot of time. Then again by socionics standards that is your polr so there you have it... It is devaluing other people's time to ask them to take a test, you estimate to take 8 hours, when they have other things to do as well. People have school, careers and families to deal with too.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  19. #379
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    He is saying you are the extrovert and that is why you don't have the patience. :/
    Oh? He knows how calm and patient I am because he’s met me in real life?

    He’s insecure and he’s afraid that he’s made the biggest mistake in his life lol so he’ll keep twisting things to come out on top
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  20. #380
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    I may change the key periodically with list's updates. But not to remove.



    Quiet people which more hear you, than flood by own speaking what you are harder to hold, - is more about introverts which hence fit to your preferences more.

    If you'd did IR test comletely and without knowing the types there - then it would be rather more significant to describe your preferences.

    Nontypes factors may reduce and distort IR effects in your consciousness.
    You knew the key, about LSI there and also you wish to think yourself EII - so you were predisposed to accent on negative.
    You need to evaluate impressions not directly but to _compare_ 2 groups: E vs I types, - to decide which group is _more_ comfortable for you. Also it's better to do IRL.
    Not by 1-2 humans of a single type by 1-2 clips per every.



    People which want to do the test correctly will have no problems to do not open the key before it should to be.
    The interests of minority of alike 20% which may have no enough of selfcontrol are lesser important than to leave the possibility to use the test without my assistance. Also, that minority is not expected to have the patience to do the test correctly (takes ~8 hours) - as it needs even more of selfcontrol.

    > You just put the temptation there by posting it.

    the ones following temptations live by instincts, not by thinking about better ways. to use the typology is for more responsible ones

    > When I took tests in school I was not given the answers along with it. I found out the answers after I finished the test.

    Making school tests better than your real skills you did not thought as a problem for you. In other case there should not be a significant problem to do not look at answers page. Also the test is assumed for adults, but not kids with undeveloped psyche to follow the reason.
    In Herbert's "Dune" there is an episode (if I remember it correctly) of a torture by an illusionary pain - proof after achieving mature age. If an aristocrat has good selfcontrol and does not remove the hand - he deserves to live. In other case he should die, being not responsible enough to have the power. Knowledge is the power.
    Lol I just noticed the key. You are something else because you are blind. Then why didn’t you make a test without a key if you didn’t want people to know the results also Dimitry VIs like my husband. And, never mind that someone who met me real life said “she’s a Socionics master” and that’s exactly what I am. I don’t need your approval and your test is so bad
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  21. #381
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    The reason more people do not take your test is because it takes a lot of time.
    1) the test (in now format) is a secondary method which is useful to show which types are more possible, but not to show clearly the concrete type. and not many ones gave me videointerviews for primary typing method, the results of which secondary method may support or to oppose against, 2) people are skeptical to the test's efficiency compared to the needed efforts; in case there was better objective basis to trust - they'd did it more.

    Sooner or later there will be objective basis. What I do now - show on practice that IR work and try to develop how to use them for typing and mb to prove duality hypothesis.
    It may take up to 20 years to make normal IR test instead of the pack of random youtube bloggers lol the sorting of which is analysed without formalized system still. Besides better videos, it needs to develop a calculation method - so the types sorting gave a number to possibility of every type to be correct. It's all rather raw. People understand this. What they do not understand - that even this raw test is better than anything else for IR analysis. It took me 15 years of regular typing to get the typing skills enough to create this list. The only alternative is to study the typing themselves and to type people near IRL - this takes monthes, but not 8 hours what they think as "a lot". Many people even still think it's ok to post a questionnaire to be correctly typed lol - sure they'll be typed by noobs and being novices can be impressed by the arguments to accept the bs they get. To understand the use of something it needs some knowledge, while the ones who asks abour own types mostly have no it. And there is nothing objective to change their own perception. They see just another dude on forums which does alike anyone else here - posts own speculations. Someones (mb 50%) did the test badly as did not follow to recommendations - how those cases can be distinguished from normal testing? Here is a mix of relatively good and so so results, - leads to not good general impression. While the reasons behind this are unknown - mb it's not good test, this reduces the wish to do it for many ones.

    > It is devaluing other people's time to ask them to take a test

    to study the typing and to type people by yourself for IR checking will take much longer. the current recommendations is the only and still partial alternative. try to offer better way, having strong N and kind of lesser devaluing of peoples time if you do not know better ways, then there is no basis to claim about the devaluing

    the example of SLI above I suppose was glad to spend some hours to get a proof of his SLI. he still needs to do own research and own typing, but at now has alike 80-90% chance his type is SLI. while some dudes here try to understand own types for years without IR or with lame own typing

    > you estimate to take 8 hours

    8 seconds would be much too, as there can be other things to do during them

    When you'll know about better IR checking alternative - then I'll hear with an interest your words about time devaluing.
    I myself checked own type by IR with IRL people for several monthes to be sure in it. To check by the existing videos in Internet there is no sooner way with acceptable accuracy - I tried to use a single clip per a human - that gave significantly lower typing matches in my experiment on socioforum, only 2 clips have given the average matche comparable with IRL interview in SRT-99. You need at least 2 examples per a type to generalize the impressions and such to be able to remove nontypes factors. As are used bloggers but not special typing videointerviews - I've added 3rd example. Mb you may watch a clip for lesser time in case you are N type, but S types need to watch longer to understand correctly the impressions - those 3-4 minutes are based on my own experience of me being S type. All my recommendations are not taken from nowhere - they are practical minimum.
    The monthes is the time for alternative approach on comparable IR checking. But 8 hours is so much compared to monthes and years. People may do incompetent flood, to discuss heresies or random stuff on the forum with other noobs for several hours per a week - this deserves more of their time, sure. Flood's time is holly time. Aylen's time police watches and protects you. Oh that IR test - 8 hours of unholy IR checking, unholly by Ne devaluing IEIs standards.

  22. #382
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamouchou View Post
    So I've finished the test, and here are my results :
    1-EII
    2-EIE
    3-IEE
    4-SLE
    5-ILE
    6-SEE
    7-IEI
    8-LIE
    9-LSE
    10-ESE
    11-SEI
    12-LSI
    13-SLI
    14-ESI
    15-LII
    16-ILI
    According to this shouldn’t you be LSE?
    @Sol imagine that... an introvert liking an introvert. He must have no patience for his IEE dual according to your logic which you just applied on me because you are denial.

    H- you are SLI. I suggest that you join an mbti group on IEE and there meet a dual. Tell them I told you that you would make a great match with them
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  23. #383
    Hamouchou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Morocco
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    According to this shouldn’t you be LSE?
    I do think that I relate more to Fi dual seeking rather than Ne. My interactions with ESI and EIIs have been very refreshing and "humanizing", but I think that my general attraction to extraverts is a stronger indicator than one position, wouldn't you say so ?

    EDIT : Lol, nevermind.

  24. #384
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    1) the test (in now format) is a secondary method which is useful to show which types are more possible, but not to show clearly the concrete type. and not many ones gave me videointerviews for primary typing method, the results of which secondary method may support or to oppose against, 2) people are skeptical to the test's efficiency compared to the needed efforts; in case there was better objective basis to trust - they'd did it more.

    Sooner or later there will be objective basis. What I do now - show on practice that IR work and try to develop how to use them for typing and mb to prove duality hypothesis.
    It may take up to 20 years to make normal IR test instead of the pack of random youtube bloggers lol the sorting of which is analysed without formalized system still. Besides better videos, it needs to develop a calculation method - so the types sorting gave a number to possibility of every type to be correct. It's all rather raw. People understand this. What they do not understand - that even this raw test is better than anything else for IR analysis. It took me 15 years of regular typing to get the typing skills enough to create this list. The only alternative is to study the typing themselves and to type people near IRL - this takes monthes, but not 8 hours what they think as "a lot". Many people even still think it's ok to post a questionnaire to be correctly typed lol - sure they'll be typed by noobs and being novices can be impressed by the arguments to accept the bs they get. To understand the use of something it needs some knowledge, while the ones who asks abour own types mostly have no it. And there is nothing objective to change their own perception. They see just another dude on forums which does alike anyone else here - posts own speculations. Someones (mb 50%) did the test badly as did not follow to recommendations - how those cases can be distinguished from normal testing? Here is a mix of relatively good and so so results, - leads to not good general impression. While the reasons behind this are unknown - mb it's not good test, this reduces the wish to do it for many ones.

    > It is devaluing other people's time to ask them to take a test

    to study the typing and to type people by yourself for IR checking will take much longer. the current recommendations is the only and still partial alternative. try to offer better way, having strong N and kind of lesser devaluing of peoples time if you do not know better ways, then there is no basis to claim about the devaluing

    the example of SLI above I suppose was glad to spend some hours to get a proof of his SLI. he still needs to do own research and own typing, but at now has alike 80-90% chance his type is SLI. while some dudes here try to understand own types for years without IR or with lame own typing

    > you estimate to take 8 hours

    8 seconds would be much too, as there can be other things to do during them

    When you'll know about better IR checking alternative - then I'll hear with an interest your words about time devaluing.
    I myself checked own type by IR with IRL people for several monthes to be sure in it. To check by the existing videos in Internet there is no sooner way with acceptable accuracy - I tried to use a single clip per a human - that gave significantly lower typing matches in my experiment on socioforum, only 2 clips have given the average matche comparable with IRL interview in SRT-99. You need at least 2 examples per a type to generalize the impressions and such to be able to remove nontypes factors. As are used bloggers but not special typing videointerviews - I've added 3rd example. Mb you may watch a clip for lesser time in case you are N type, but S types need to watch longer to understand correctly the impressions - those 3-4 minutes are based on my own experience of me being S type. All my recommendations are not taken from nowhere - they are practical minimum.
    The monthes is the time for alternative approach on comparable IR checking. But 8 hours is so much compared to monthes and years. People may do incompetent flood, to discuss heresies or random stuff on the forum with other noobs for several hours per a week - this deserves more of their time, sure. Flood's time is holly time. Aylen's time police watches and protects you. Oh that IR test - 8 hours of unholy IR checking, unholly by Ne devaluing IEIs standards.


    You callin' me a time cop?

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  25. #385
    Hamouchou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Morocco
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    You callin' me a time cop?
    You two are entertaining as hell.

  26. #386
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamouchou View Post
    My interactions with ESI and EIIs have been very refreshing and "humanizing"
    Here are 2 ESI on this forum: @aster and mb @Luminous Lynx.
    Types of people could be other than you suppose and those interactions be too limited to notice IR effects as expected.
    ESIs from the list you've placed to bottom (what is expected for SLI having them as subrevisie), while EIE - LSE's superegos to top. This excludes LSE for you. Besides other factors which point on SLI as more possible.

    Also, LSE do not change types is profiles so easily. We are reasonable and so do mistakes only after good thinking.

  27. #387
    Hamouchou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Morocco
    Posts
    45
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Also, LSE do not change types is profiles so easily. We are reasonable and so do mistakes only after good thinking.
    u wot m8? Are you saying that I'm a reckless irrational type ?

    That's an interesting point, actually. I do change my opinions quite often, which I assume is a big indicator of being an irrational type. Would you say so ?

  28. #388
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    You callin' me a time cop?
    Oh.. I imagined you alike

    damn Internet

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamouchou View Post
    I do change my opinions quite often, which I assume is a big indicator of being an irrational type. Would you say so ?
    Base T types to decide or to make a claim prefer a good basis - the most reasonable types. So they change opinions not easily, especially public claims.

    I saw a dude which changed types in own profile several times during ~3 monthes. He was on the forum for several years. Seems depending on the types of girls (in their profiles) with which ones he flirted on the forum in that moment. The initial type which he claimed himself was SEE. Then his profile had SLE, LSI and the last what I saw was LSE when he flooded with ESI which claimed herself as EII. I saw he uses more flowery language than T types, far from my own style and strange situation with his type - noticed him, and he has reacted with strange anger as seems I opposed to his game.
    Last edited by Sol; 03-10-2019 at 11:33 AM.

  29. #389
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Here are 2 ESI on this forum: @aster and mb @Luminous Lynx.
    Types of people could be other than you suppose and those interactions be too limited to notice IR effects as expected.
    ESIs from the list you've placed to bottom (what is expected for SLI having them as subrevisie), while EIE - LSE's superegos to top. This excludes LSE for you. Besides other factors which point on SLI as more possible.

    Also, LSE do not change types is profiles so easily. We are reasonable and so do mistakes only after good thinking.
    It should be noted that neither of these people have publicly accepted what you type them. I suppose since you mentioned them, they can express agreement if they wish to.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  30. #390
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Oh.. I imagined you alike

    damn Internet

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  31. #391
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    It should be noted that neither of these people have publicly accepted what you type them.
    If those were not noobs with unstable opinions. And there was no objectively bad typing skills even at experienced in typing (mb <10% of active in Socionics), what is seen in real typing matches <50%.
    Then what those think about own types would be important.

    also
    aster claimed it as EII (what is close), kept doubts during this and seems the same stays.
    Lynx (seems) claimed it as ESI, until recently has changed it.

  32. #392
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hamouchou View Post
    I do think that I relate more to Fi dual seeking rather than Ne. My interactions with ESI and EIIs have been very refreshing and "humanizing", but I think that my general attraction to extraverts is a stronger indicator than one position, wouldn't you say so ?

    EDIT : Lol, nevermind.
    Esi and EII are just soft and supportive and forgiving to a great extent that makes for easy going interaction ms with ISTP also EII like trying new things so activate SLI
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  33. #393

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    6w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've never see this method of typing, looks interesting though, here are my results.

    1. SLI (I found the style of video and demeanour engaging)
    2. ESE
    3. ILE
    4. SEE
    5. ILI
    6. LII
    7. SLE
    8. LSE
    9. LSI
    10.SEI
    11.EIE
    12.IEI (would have scored quite a bit higher, but there was a sense of detachment/distance in the videos)
    13.LIE
    14.IEE
    15.EII
    16.ESI
    Last edited by JonMoon; 06-04-2019 at 01:13 PM.

  34. #394
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @JonMoon

    It needs to place ESI. The list above has 2 IEE.

  35. #395
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Naktis
    was typed to ESI by video

    ILI
    LIE
    ILE
    LII

    EIE
    EII
    ESE
    IEE

    LSI
    SEE
    ESI
    IEI

    SLI
    LSE
    SEI
    SLE

    link

  36. #396

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    6w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the heads up, should be edited now

  37. #397
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @JonMoon

    Fe valued type
    more alpha, but not ESE

    most possible types: ILE, SEI, LII
    among them SEI has higher chance

  38. #398

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    6w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the response I'll look into those types.

  39. #399
    Anglas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Lithuania
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 7w8 So/Sp
    Posts
    1,546
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    wrtyhdrfyhgbdfccfc szdfvhbjgyfcfc sdxcvghdrfxfc zsxsx
    Last edited by Anglas; 07-09-2019 at 09:34 PM.

  40. #400
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    385
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EII
    IEI
    IEE
    SEI
    ESI
    ILI
    EIE
    LIE
    ILE
    SEE
    ESE
    LII
    LSI
    SLI
    LSE
    SLE

Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ... 6789101112 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •