Russian socionics test
This one seems like the most comprehensive yet. It's in russian though, google translate CAN have trouble with a few questions.
http://bolti.pythonanywhere.com/female
Got ILI on this one, don't know if i should put more weight on this test than the others, though.
Ohh! What nice find this is. Let's see if it works.
Addendum: 584 questions?!!!! I think I do this in several steps, what a challengeHold my poodle. I think it's worth it
1) you shoud do male, not female variant
2) the graphs this test gives are important. not only general type
3) if you do not know the language, such results are doubtful. google translate is only supportive mean
Update: currently at question 288.
I'll keep going -phew-
584 questions?what the actual.... fuck
@Sol
A male and female variant? Interesting! What are the differences between the two?
502. /holds "never ever give up" sign into the air/
Test result IEE. I need hugs
* Virtual hug * I hug you Captain Queen of endurance, Chae.
I surrender confronted with 584 questions.
i'd probably need a little more after thatOriginally Posted by Chae
Test result IEE. I need hugs
will see how it goes for me a little later
update: LII > SLI
Last edited by soulclap; 01-21-2018 at 12:57 AM. Reason: update
I keep my fingers crossed! It's the type of test that settles things.i'd probably need a little more after that
will see how it goes for me a little later
* Virtual hug * I hug you Captain Queen of endurance, Chae.
I surrender confronted with 584 questions.Huuuuuugggss!
Very long, but doesn't seem very good. Didn't work for me.
secret
Last edited by wasp; 01-17-2022 at 12:54 AM.
Huuuuuugggss! For Huxleyphonetic wordplay detected
Of course. Sorry, for my heartless answer.
Your link has "female", hence there are 2 variants. There is also field "sex", so mb to use that field is enough but it's not known.
The difference is in weight coefficients for the questions. Those coefficients are gotten experimentally.
Your leading type is IEI followed by EIE, EII and IEE. Highest scores were intuition and irrationality. It’s a pity that the results are in Russian, because google can’t translate everything. Would anyone be willing to translate the rest of it? @Sol maybe?
I need to look how big that rest is. Mb I'll help you.
the results look exactly like the results from this socionics test: http://aimtoknow.com/test_beta
the only real difference is the length (this version is ~400 questions longer) and the extremely poor translation
I hope that someone will make an official translation soon, even though... I know that 584 questions are a lot to take in.
You edited the avalanche of hearts out of the quote!!! SCANDAL!!! Don't you feel the love
Of course. Sorry, for my heartless answer.
Ahh. /pat pat/ Don't sweaty it sweaty.
Official is which was approved by the author. Probably there is English version.
To do it good needs excellent knowledge of both languages. This assumes either special education or good language experience of emigrants. Not many people can do it good. While to do it bad means the possibility to reduce the test's accuracy.
Anyway, it's doubtfully the large test's version is significantly better than the shorter. While shorter was translated not just by google, at least.
The other problem. If you know the theory and have opinion about own type you may mislead any test. The ones who use typology forums are not for which such tests are done. It's more important than is there 500 or 200 questions.
I used Gulenko's test in the past. It had like 72 questions and gave for me same result like Talanov's with >500 questions. I tested about ~5 people. Seems it gave either correct type or wrong single dichotomy. The important is - those people knew nothing about typology, except me certainly which was one of them.
I'd like to know what this table means: (Google can't translate the cognitive functions correctly)
functions.png
I don't understand this either:
sc.png
Everything else was successfully translated by google.
I'd also like to know what this means: Ваш ведущий соционический тип — ИЭИ (s = 0.23, k = 0.91):I understand it says my leading type is IEI, but what does s and k mean?
Don't worry, Chae.You edited the avalanche of hearts out of the quote!!! SCANDAL!!! Don't you feel the love
I keep all the hearts clean and safe in my storage. Just ask me and I give them all back to you, without the slightest damage.
I feel love because I have the power of a lot of hearts right now.
IEE (0.18), EII (0.16)
just wonder why i find my duals in this forum the dumbest people ive ever met
Last edited by ooo; 01-22-2018 at 05:29 AM.
Delta STs are not dumb. Just look at Sol. He is very intelligent.
YHOUD MAKE A PERFECT DELTA ST LAVOS
Ni Ne Si Se Ti Te Fi Fe [then heresy]
> I don't understand this either
% of every type in your personality
[from biggest to the least]
EIE, ILE, LII, IEI, ILI, ESI, ESE, IEE, SLI, LSE, EII, SEE, SLE, SEI, LSI
Taking into account the test says IEI as your leading type, this scheme uses other algorithm to identify the type. As it says wrongly, I'd recommend to forget it. You may ask Talanov's followers what their guru thinks about the use of this.
> I'd also like to know what this means: Ваш ведущий соционический тип — ИЭИ (s = 0.23, k = 0.91):I understand it says my leading type is IEI, but what does s and k mean?
k - should be the statistical correlation of your answers to common for IEI. In psychology correlations >0.7 are thought as good
s - sigma, the other param to show how much your answers differ to common for IEI. <0.3 may be thought as low
Talanov used several people of "known" types to make types profiles. Then he compares your answers with average of their answers. And says that numbers as the degree of your similarity to them.
because you like them, while the relations between equal are more possible
With your shaming and slander, you are truly the poster child for feminism. I pity any man unfortunate enough to cross your path.
u must have scored delta st
fuck off already~
Alas I am only at question 245, but I don't need to take a test to know that you're an idiot.
Sweet dreams.
yeah usually people don't take tests to assert other people's intelligence... and thanks, as usual your insults seem like compliments to me ^^
I didnt understand why you attacked me, so thanks for adding this precious part~With your shaming and slander,
(my "shaming and slander" instead is in response of the provocations that some of the self-proclaimed delta st continuously throw at me, obviously you have nothing to do with this but it's funny to see you react like a itchy feminist ((-; )
Of the opinion that your type is other than in the profile. As you change it regularly there your behavior is especially nonsense.
> some of the self-proclaimed delta st
Not only self. I was assumed as LSE by 3 people, known in Socionics, before agreed with them. Besides some others who agree with it.
> continuously throw at me
While this is victimish paranoia. As recently you apologized for your behavior you understand that it's not adequate.
> it's funny to see you react like a itchy feminist
He's funny like you. And same can be beta F.
I've kept my type unvaried until you started to tell me I was an IEI, and only started to change it to annoy people in here : ) glad it worked
And yeah right, this was a good test wasn't it? It just doesn't work if I take it. SIGH, YOUR BIAS.
leave me alone. I'm not kidding. leave me alone.
You thought your type as INFP, behaved like IEI and had EII in the profile. You gave me typing video and I've confirmed IEI / INFP. Also I've explained you that INFP = IEI, but not EII. For some time you agreed with my opinion. Then you've started to write random types in the profile and to show anger on noticings that bs in your profile is wrong. Just another funny IEI.
> and only started to change it to annoy people in here : ) glad it worked
I'm glad that your mental health is better than it seemed.
> And yeah right, this was a good test wasn't it? It just doesn't work if I take it. SIGH, YOUR BIAS.
This test gave you (with low correlation) IEE as the main version and what is wrong. The test is not perfect as any other. It gave me LSI in past.
> leave me alone
go away from the forum and you'll be alone. keep your bs away from the forum and other will not argue with you
If you want lesser of my attention you need lesser provoke me, like did in this thread and previously with bs in the profile and then by senseless arguing. Your behavior is irrational and victimish what is often at IEI. I think you seek my attention according to your actions, but not words. Being the conflictor I'm interesting for you, cute girl.
P.S. EII is not your type. I'm not kidding.
if you'll break it - you'll fix it
That was unnecessarily long, aim2know test is shorter, translated and provides the same report. Anyway, my result:
Ваш ведущий соционический тип — СЛИ
Your leading socionic type is SLI
Attachment 12471
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
