You aren't the only one but you seemed to be one who "listened." Obviously I won't go around asking everyone nicely to reconsider their typing and do their activity somewhere else. But talk about hypocrisy... I forgot to mention one thing: the "chesty daddy" picture I used as bait... got me two likes, one from you and another from someone else. It's not that I'm against sexuality, it's just that when it has too much Social in it and less intimacy, then is left to be nothing more than hollow tabloid fantasy. It's okay if some people like it, that's their thing, however, that has been going on for years in this and other threads which clearly indicates some form of herd mentality. And now you're upset bc I got you singled out per doing the same thing. Sooner or later someone must take responsibility - and if you don't like that, you're "not syn-flow," haha...Originally Posted by Your caregiver in turn
Instead of posting sexy things, why don't you just simply ask for having sex (and with this-and-this type of guy(/girl))?Dude, you are like rambling a lot…do you need someone to talk or something? If that so, its better to just asking for it instead of provoking absurd discussions.Aren't you doing the same if you claim I'm So/Sp?[...]instead of saying that you are sx/sp (when you are so/sp)[...]
Hypocrisy is just unavoidable for hypocrite ppl. Don't cry about social classes or come with moralizing speeches if you don't know anything about me.[...]For a sec I got a masochistic impression... as if, apart from the logical argumentation that there wouldn't be any benefit from me talking to you, you were hinting that "do not talk to me because I'm a bad person." Could be just my uhh... "deviated imagination." But anyways, you coming through this strong, with such snarkiness made me think of Enneagram 8s, if you were one, I'd better not try mess with you, cause some take Trump as an 8, and according to theory, they'd do anything to win, to get on top.Otherwise you are talking just for talk...or for the sake of venting your own repressed frustrations as I said above. Anyway, I think you should have better things to do to improve your social class than speaking with me.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Last edited by Hope; 08-23-2017 at 07:49 AM.
Well, I volunteered, the same way you are doing with all these twisted offenses. Who appointed you at all to represent the people? You thought it's best to have someone to stand up for others against an outsider, an intruder, right? Those are leadership qualities, and anything but Social blind spot. But I get your message. You are the guardian and the lone-wolf has to be discredited. To move beyond your exaggerations... it wasn't as much about judging others, but more about demonstrating, bringing them in a position where they'd realize, become aware of a different perspective. And there is such a thing called outgroup bias, when a group becomes reckless and unwilling to take in new information. It won't work without some judging and without some reluctant acceptance. But if you are saying that I'm the one who's way-way wrong here, then it's okay, I must agree that forcing help does sound insane.
And yes, outsiders usually do come off as hypocrites. Like, advertising solar panels/healthier lifestyle in Africa. You know what the native leaders do there? They tell the poor folk that these developed people are hypocrites and all they want is to keep everyone in darkness and exploit them. But in hindsight the leaders make deals with the hypocrites bc they also want from the good stuff, they tell people the good stuff is bad and to keep up their hard work, keep working/belonging to them. Basically, saying I'm wrong ... no-no-no, insulting me by twisting and bending everything I say to discredit me, you order everyone else on your side. Because ideology / theory / mental attitudes form these invisible lines of belonging. You don't have to agree, I'm just saying this to the others. Maybe there's a possibility of a better world out there if information flow and innovation ownership wasn't tied so closely to politics/people's greed.
All I needed was credit for my creative insights but the extent you've gone to defend your social reputation (that like does mean something in the social) makes me believe maybe that information wouldn't land in good hands here. --- that is to refer to your previous post about me witholding my syn-/contraflow "misinformation." Of course this is a forum and we're all free to leave. But every forum is a social public. And there wouldn't be nations, higher groups if it weren't for the leaders. It's not all bad until some war erupts, some immigrants come and the poor turn poorer and the rich richer and it all turns into a slum. Again, this is just a forum, only small-scale but if leaders are unwilling to compromise on information, there must be some interests involved... that's all I'm saying.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Last edited by Hope; 08-26-2017 at 01:32 PM.
I did insult you? Then why wasn't that your first step, to point it out before you started insulting me, tenfolds, like, at each post? Because that one I really have a hard time grasping... I am critical, vehement at times, yes, but that's only for clarity, order. It's really hard to feel sorry for you when now you're so beyond "even."
my criticism/assertion for civility is below virtual theories: even without any smarts one can tell if a group activity is progressive, thinking, getting somewhere or they just lounge about in low-maintenance to self-gratify and be intellectually complacent. You don't need to understand Enneagram 8 or 1 to tell the difference between assertiveness for indulgence and suspension of defined rules/boundaries/order ("fun-time") vs. self-restraint, pleasure delay for the sake of clarity, separation of disparate elements, rules, order. Of course a lot of "rationals" claim to want order and demonstrate that with their sound logical discernment, only to see them becoming "protective" of the humanities/feeler parts of the internet, that which they don't really understand much about. That was the same in the heyday of early typology (MBTi) foruming.
Except for impaired empathy, an ordinary guy who's looking for down-to-earth, loving, loyal friends and a geeky, warm, voluptuous girlfriend!
Enrique Iglesias - IEI sx/sp 9w8
@lynn please don't do that.
Last edited by Hope; 08-31-2017 at 08:31 PM.
"All nations will place their hope in him."
(Mt 12:21)
Social last at the very least.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
No more talking
Don’t mean nothing
All I want is you
Shed my lovin’
Got back nothing
I just want what’s true
the eyes reminded me of sx/sp
I'm bad at love
But you can't blame me for tryin'
You know I'd be lyin' sayin'
You were the one
That could finally fix me
Lookin' at my history
I'm bad at love
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
"I want to hurt you just to hear you screaming my name, don't want to touch you but you're under my skin, I want to kiss you but your lips are venomous poison"
obvious but yes
I feel like alot of 80s rock stars were sx/sp
"Relationships aren’t worth having unless you’re two people colliding like supernovas into deep, honest, naked love for one another."
"Nothing's right without you here
I'll give all that I have just to keep you near
I wrote you a letter, I tried to make it clear
You don't seem to think that I’m sincere
I've been thinking about you, baby
Come live with me"
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I like this one
Not sure if it's sx/sp or sx/so, but this song is very sx nonetheless.
"Have you ever felt like when you meet someone, they fill this hole inside of you and that when they’re gone you feel that space painfully vacant?"
— Ian Gray
their lead vocalist is some kind of Si rational, sx/sp 7w8
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
). 
