So, um, what's up with this? Extreme lip fillers and H-cup breast implants are gross a.f.
So, um, what's up with this? Extreme lip fillers and H-cup breast implants are gross a.f.
Last edited by xerx; 12-11-2021 at 12:38 AM.
When standards are informed by photo editing.
It's not my thing, but it's sweet that someone would try to change themselves so much for the benefit of the other sex.
I like natural beauty more than fake. Body modification leads down a dangerous path. It should be used cautiously.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I think there is a level of objectification that is sort of inevitable, but I think there's a danger in viewing oneself as an object. It could be seen as generous to give oneself up for the pleasure of another, but you are disassociating your self by identifying with the object of desire in the eyes of another.
The problem is that you identifying with something that you can never fully fulfill. I think from the feelings of lack that this creates, it will eventually lead to self-hatred.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I guess some people try to correct their physical insecurities with that, resulting in getting far uglier but not noticing.
I have also noticed that some women think for some reason that men like bimbos like men think women like very muscular men. What I've seen women to like have either been very thin guys or guys with dad bodies for some reason, and I see a similar tendency for men's likings.
If you think that is bad, just wait until you see what they do with game characters
6a00d8341bf74053ef019affb33465970d-500wi.jpg
(I have no idea how to use uploads here )
Maybe because physical attractiveness is a thing because it points to better GENETICS. Once something is obviously no longer a result of GENETICS but of focused work/artificial modification, our brains cease to register it as attractive in a mate in terms of usefulness for passing down benefit to offspring.
Body dysmorphic disorder?
Women compete against women,
when women start wearing makeup, you feel like you do too, to keep up, and it goes on and on and on…
some people get really caught up and lost in it
I actually prefer women who wear little or no makeup, but I can't deny that makeup makes a woman look different. Lots different. More like a fantasy, and less like someone you actually might know.
Last edited by Adam Strange; 01-23-2022 at 11:45 PM.
It is very unfortunate and defeating that we make people spice up and toil without any end sign ocean of foundational sculpture that we drill and smash the pendulum of nosy squiggles in the naughty candy store to force others to enhance and stain their bolts and quicksand to appear so seductive and glass picture ideal without any imagination for blasting off above the biome of infinity considered amulets of kingship and will.
Raptor is the 1 true Slowking. He came to completely master the system, doorways of holy wisdom and flowering to penetrate beyond bubbles of live wire explosions and channels to impulsive luster curling detonators and bell towers to resonate and build coastlines of futures and roses polarizing happy treasuries installing powers of earth and triumph!!
Raptor will completely master the system by winning in 2014 and 2019 to further emblazon victory over George Lucas, stadiums of ruby threads igniting passion and elevators of empiricism smashing imaginative flurries meteor mashing charcoal and feathers to fissure grand canyon tomes of pewter plunge cinnabar souls walking pages of diaries to firmaments of steel giga harvesting timer ball ready to unleash shards of heaven!!
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...k-2024-edition
Women naturally look too plain without some make up and a little bimbofying but I think if you are a true straight guy the plainness is what you are attracted to in a way? Just like gay guys like rainbow colors and campy neon shit- women are the opposite and are just naturally plain. The strength of all feminism/female power has mostly been a kind of gray-ish communal power rather than individual power for this reason. Some women get annoyed/jealous they can never be like the alpha male colorful peacock in the room and be thought of as that - but traditionally speaking a female's best power has always been making people feel bad for not being normal/regular/"plain" enough lol. It's kind of funny- both extreme feminists and incels have like massive penis envy. They are both very obsessed with the biggest male peacock in the room, and everybody teases both of them how Chad-obsessed they are etc. Whereas other ppl can view the situation more objectively.
I think it makes women insecure because there can be a fine line between "bimboing" making a woman look better/a bit of color to balance out the plainness, and wearing too much make-up/being obsessed with buying all the make-up and boob jobs men can make and looking whoreish/"slutty" etc. Because it's like you are not-so-subconsciously telling a woman there is something simply wrong with being a woman - since in a very natural/scientific way female mammals have always been plainer compared to males. Ie the manes of male lions. So I don't really blame the women who are all 'fuck this shit I'm not going to wear this just to make somebody else happy.'