...
...
Last edited by Squirrel; 10-01-2022 at 08:27 PM.
gamma SF? IEE?
https://linktr.ee/tehhnicus
Jesus is King stops black magic and closes portals
self diagnosed ASD, ADHD, schizotypal/affective
Your face makes your brain and sociotype – how muscle use shapes personality
I want to care
if I was better I’d help you
if I was better you’d be better
Human Design 2/4 projector life path 1
mabye IEI
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
the section will be updated ever other month or so.
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
You really remind me of many ESIs I know. You might, however, need to take my opinion with a pinch of salt
Most likely Beta NF. Maybe IEI-C or EIE-H... Dynamic, and Ethical dichotomies seem clear.
Just by VI ... I go with EIE, very similar to mother when she was younger (comparing to pics I posted in unofficial member pic thread this last few days)
Last edited by crazymaisy; 03-30-2022 at 04:09 PM. Reason: added link to post with pics
My first impression from VI, @decqueen, is either IEE or EIE.
I'm slightly leaning toward IEE because of "classic old-style (delta)" earrings, and your eyes look a bit more Fi than Fe.
*OBLIGATORY I DON'T KNOW WHAT I'M DOING ADVISORY*
Going purely off my intuition you look EIE to me
“Things always seem fairer when we look back at them, and it is out of that inaccessible tower of the past that Longing leans and beckons.”
— James Russell Lowell猫が生き甲斐
@decqueen I don't like to use just one picture, but you look Ip and Fe. SEI or IEI. What type do you type as?
Bound upon me, rush upon me, I will overcome you by enduring your onset: whatever strikes against that which is firm and unconquerable merely injures itself by its own violence. Wherefore, seek some soft and yielding object to pierce with your darts.
-Seneca
Bound upon me, rush upon me, I will overcome you by enduring your onset: whatever strikes against that which is firm and unconquerable merely injures itself by its own violence. Wherefore, seek some soft and yielding object to pierce with your darts.
-Seneca
this theme lacks my opinion
Complex logical calculations which were officially confirmed.
There is some lack of data, but you knew the situation. I just was left without a choice. *sigh*
> Perhaps in another cosmic world, if such a thing exists , so ( Game over )²
Exists. If the reality did not had additional dimensions than symbols guessing did not work. Besides it's among models to explain some physical facts.
I have over 1,000 posts on this forum + some pictures in the unofficial member photos thread, if you're good at searching you will find themThere is some lack of data, but you knew the situation. I just was left without a choice. *sigh*
In any case, I promise I will not take your typing seriously
Souls know their way back home
Video is important for nonverbal. Other data is secondary, limited, not comfortable to get and partly is not available for me.
Photos are mainly useful when it's tens of them made in different time and situations. Video is much better often and may be thought as obligate.
The access to "unofficial member photos" thread was forbidden for my account against forum rules and by censorship reasons. I said what think about peoples types based on their photos and someones as Maritsa did not liked this to whine to mods and they limited the access. Other people say opinion in that thread, but my seems has weight enough to annoy someones. Also was a warning that in case I've create another account and hence will can to bypass the censorship then my account will be forbidden to be used forever. Nice place. Many forums which I know have harmful and corrupted mods, sometimes harmful demands.
> I will not take your typing seriously
In case will exist normal data for typing, to think my opinion as not meaningful will be not reasonable and hence with significant chance it may influence on your own opinion.
As what you say rejects common reason, so this is among arguments for your weak T and nonvalued Te.
-
When you'll place video interview for your typing in 1st message of this theme or your other typing theme, only then your efforts with asking about help here with your type will get good sense, as further discussion with you here.
As video is obligate and is main data to be used, and here are no others with comparable typing skills as me for its usage.
To stay with "meh" and to flood further on the site about content of what you don't understand a minimum without own correct type will be not useful time sparing. Seems your own interests is not what is interesting for you, - it's where your egocentric and irrational negativism leads you.
Last edited by Sol; 03-12-2023 at 12:32 PM.
for me, I knew what I wanted from socionics and I'm not really interested in it anymore, I'm only here because my brain formed a habit of browsing and commenting in this forum , for this reason, I will not take your typing seriously, and I will not make a second video, especially since the last time I made it , it wasted my phone's battery fastly , and there is not enough electricity here to charge it whenever I want especially if I considered that our non-electric charging devices are consumed by all family members as well, and I am not alone
Souls know their way back home
"Interests: Good question , unfortunately I have no answer"
egocentric irrational negativism ruins your interests
What is known behavior fits to IEI, as I've said. With a video, mb I'd saw something else in you.
No good data -> think yourself. And gather noobish opinions based on bad info.
wbr
@Emily
you could upload your old video again, if you still have it.
I thought T based on your video, but it would be interesting to see again, since you are uncertain. ILI I remember thinking as the most likely of T's. but your behaviour after some while on the forum seems to be going relatively more away from T than it was earlier.TIM: Te
I don't have it@Emily
you could upload your old video again, if you still have it.
"If " I do it again, it won't be before three months, I have very important exams and I'm busy with it
Normal, absolutely very normal, I am not surprised to hear that , behavior is superficial and changeable , it's influenced by many factors such as parental upbringing of the person , environment, Enneagram ( egs: ethical E6 are logical-ish , logical E4 are more feelers than typical , rational E7 are more irrational-ish , irrational E1 are more rational-ish ) etcbut your behaviour after some while on the forum seems to be going relatively more away from T than it was earlier.
To type accurately, the person should look at “why does the person do this behavior”, not “what does he do” because one behavior may result from many motives , this is difficult to do with socionics because its focus is on how the type appears in the community (how it behaves, how it interacts with others using ITR , etc.) , not on how it thinks and why
Souls know their way back home
it's impossible to always know 'why' something is done. but if the person is seen to be behaving consistently in a manner which points to one dichotomy etc. over the other, then that can be assumed with more likelihood. the certainty of the typing just depends on the degree to which the actions of the person points to that dichotomy (frequency of type-relevant behaviour; specifics of the action where other possible causes can be considered unlikely or excluded etc.). when a person is known IRL, then the quantity and quality of data of behaviour is higher and the conclusion can be done with more security. a video is one important asset for correctly typing online, because it gives access to very important behavioral data: nonverbal. your behaviour + my remembering of your video here is not enough for me to confidently say T or Fnot “what does he do” because one behavior may result from many motives
this goes directly from how it thinks. but not only the type steers the behaviour.how it behaves, how it interacts with others using ITR , etc.
T's can get somewhat looser with an increase in comfortable feeling, can get more secure in expressing themselves under those circumstances. i'm not sure if this is the case here or notNormal, absolutely very normal
Last edited by nifl; 03-17-2023 at 11:48 PM.
In Socionics alone yes it's impossible , in other systems you can find explanationsit's impossible to always know 'why' something is done.
Coming back to the same problem, what if someone is affected by a certain Enneagram that causes him to deviate from the behavior expected of a dichotomy in his type? Enneagram affects behavior a lot because it drives functions, not vice versaif the person is seen to be behaving consistently in a manner which points to one dichotomy etc.
Souls know their way back home