Sp/Sx
Sp/Sx
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
Sp/sx
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
SX/SO ❤️
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Originally Posted by Jailbait
SX/SO ❤️
SP/SX
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I guess I'm one of the only few that it was way off for. Seems pretty accurate for everybody else.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
Sp/Sx, although I self type as Sp/So...does an So blindspot manifest in something as obvious as being averse to interaction with groups? Googling now.. lol
Choosing answers for this quiz was quite eeny, meeny, miny, moe like.
I received the result of Sx/Sp which apparently would equal a bitchface look:
http://istj-hedonist.tumblr.com/post...6-sosp-vs-sxsp
I can’t stand bitchface look so hopefully something is incorrect.
SP/SX for me.
I got Sx/Sp!
LSI-Se 836 Sp/Sx
Whaa? How did you confirmed it's SP second?Answer confirms SP secondary
And Sp/sx would be less averse to groups than an Sp/So, as it's contra flow
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I self-type as SO/SP but got SP/SX on that test. So it wasn't accurate for me.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
SO/SP ❤
I've been considering that I might in fact be a SO/SP and not SO/SX. hmm
Have you read these descriptions:
https://oceanmoonshine9.wordpress.com/four-stacks/
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
sx/sp
since it was made by you I decided to lower my expectationbut unfortunately your test exceeded them by a good degree so good job
I got sp/sx btw
sp/sx.
One criticism I have is that the sx stuff focused on relationships and only once or twice mentioned other obsessions. When a test regularly includes the other obsessive pursuits, I score sx/sp. When they don't include it, then I have to make do with the sp answers...as those items are equal to or slightly less than my obsessive pursuits.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
As I've said many times that does sound like sx first. Far from all sx firsts "look for love" all the time, and I know sx lasts who have been relationship-addicts going from one person to the next. I dont either "look for love", that seems so unnatural and I dont need to be in a relationship, rather its a relief to be single because I get so obsessed in relationships and it puts me at the mercy of my jealousy and other emotions and I can't focus on other things."SX/SP ❤"
Agreed.
Fwiw, my relationships become my focus/obsession when I'm in them, and they are always "intense" but this probably relates more so to me being enneagram 4 and Beta. Imo, intensity in relationships doesn't have a lot to do with stacking, my IEE mother is sx first, and her relationships have never been anywhere near as intense as mine. When I'm single, I focus on myself 100% and don't bother to look for love. I also have a lot of manglik energy in my vedic astrology chart, which probably points to me have stronger sx for an sp/sx. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangal_Dosha
"The planet of Mars represents respect, energy, ego and self-esteem. Therefore one with the Mangal Dosha has a volatile temper. Manglik individuals thus face a lot of problems in bending and adjusting with their partners. The energy of Manglik individuals can be compared to that of fire. Therefore this energy needs to be used in the right direction and in doing something constructive, or otherwise they might become ruthless. "
It kind of sucks that I have this, because all of my relationships have been agonizing af. :/ It's better for me to remain single, because I honestly can't handle that level of pain anymore, otherwise I may end up dead or in a mental institution.
What I look for when I'm among people is people who attract me, like I have an invisible antenna searching for people I can 'hook' into. It's usually men because I'm attracted to men but it can also be women, that I like the idea of merging with them and I like the idea of incorporating what I envision/idealize them to be into myself, im not even really interested in truly 'being their friend' or supporting them. But that's cause Im social last, and maybe a bad person. You could possibly be sx/so and if you are you'll be more genuinly interested in those kinds of real connections.
Sx second dont get that extreme level of obsession youre talking about, only in rare circumstances ive seen sx second or even last 'act' sx first, like at the breakup of a long term relationship, it may happen. But its not a recurring thing.
The inability to put sx aside and relax about it is what makes someone sx first.
Last edited by maniac; 11-26-2017 at 04:12 PM.
Sp/So. Some of my replies did made me wonder which one of the sx-blinds it would give, and eh. Sounds accurate
Yeah no points against SX-lastSp/So. Some of my replies did made me wonder which one of the sx-blinds it would give, and eh. Sounds accurate
I got sp/so. It works better than most playbuzz quizzes.
"What in life has bothered and preoccupied you the most?"
Aren't relationships and friendships the same thing?
sp/so, nice!
Maybe this is because I've been on a health and exercise kick for the past year or so. Hmmm
Always welcome typing advice. :]
Reply With Quote
Actually when I changed one thing I got sx/sp. It was an image. I was kind of indifferent to all three even though I like some pieces of two of them and the other is not my style but I can see the value in it. 
