I considered an Fe PoLR type (ILI or SLI), but I'm not sure.
Questionnaire used:
https://wholesocionics.blogspot.com/...tionnaire.html
Type me
I considered an Fe PoLR type (ILI or SLI), but I'm not sure.
Questionnaire used:
https://wholesocionics.blogspot.com/...tionnaire.html
ENTP Don Quixote or ENFJ Hamlet
https://youtu.be/zwHk0-R3E74
Last edited by khcs; 10-19-2020 at 08:24 PM.
This is the comment you are looking for
ILI>ESI>SLI
IEI
Maybe SLI. You show schoolbook examples of Fe-polr, like: "All days are the same, there is nothing special about holidays".
You say some things that can seem "philosophical", but I think they are more tied to Fe polr and not to Ni. ILIs produce more substantial intuitive philosophy, often incomprehensible (to me).
Your eyes also look more sensing than intuitive. So I put my bet on SLI for now.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Interesting answers out there.
What made your impression?Originally Posted by Duschia
Fe-valuing and 4D Ne? Hmm, never thought of that.
Where did you observe Ni?
So I'm seeing Gamma/Delta types here unlike one of the other posts that had Alpha/Beta types. Interesting.
Any explanations?
Didn't think philosophical stuff can pertain to Fe-PoLR. Also, any observations of Si-lead?
I also wonder about the observation of the eyes. What are the differences between sensing and intuitive eyes?
I think ILI. Your like entire aura comes off as a Gamma male soooo badly.
SLI > ESI
Whoops. I watched some more.
ESI > SLI.
go to world socionics society to be typed. they are on Facebook and YouTube.
Socionics -
the16types.info
Interesting. Didn't think of the word elitism here, but interesting.
Any explanations or just a vibe?
What changed your mind? Were both videos different to you or what?
I'll try that too, thanks.
Just a vibe. But a bit more than 'just' because it's how you also appear aesthetically. The physical shape of your jaw, and face and eyes etc.Any explanations or just a vibe?
Dear Lord you think business management is interesting? lol. Sorry. But I'm the opposite. Yes that's clear Te over Fe valuing.
In the first video, I saw some (not 4D) Te and you looked laid back and super relaxed and I associate that with SLI.
In the second video, you look more like a guy I know who is certainly ESI, plus you momentarily channeled both Bruce Springsteen and Bob Dylan.
Fe-polrs can be critical of social customs and attitudes, so it can show itself as something like a philosophical attitude. Not necessarily though.
Intuitive eyes seem to look at something invisible, beyond the physical world. Ne seems to look at ideas floating around, and Ni seems to look "into eternity". This is very exaggerated though, but it can sometimes be accurate.
I watched the video again, but I am not so sure anymore. And what did you say about existing? Like we don't know if anything exists or something?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
@Unknown5145 @Saberstorm
Looks like I have to pay money for it. I totally understand it, but I can't afford doing that.
@BandD
Well, yes, but I also took the concentration because it's generally deemed as "easy", even though I'm not doing that particularly well right now. As I said on my first video, my family pushed me to continue college, even though I didn't want to. I'm not very decisive when it comes to stuff like this, as it took me more than 2 years to do so. They believe I wouldn't have any other plans in my life and my plan would only be moving out from them, despite not having a job yet.
@Adam Strange
Hmm okay. I guess it's because of the questions in the questionnaire and the answers I gave to them, making me look different in both of the videos. I must have given answers that do not end up being consistent with one specific/single type. That's why I've been questioning my type. I also may have appeared lowered down in my first video and stood up higher in my second one. The thing is that I doubt being an ethical type as a whole since my Fe is quite weak to begin with, but nonetheless, it's still interesting to see.
@Tallmo
I see what you're saying about the eyes, I think that's true as well.
As for existing, what I meant was that seeing everything that's been happening in this world lately and how society has a strict and stubborn way of how the world is supposed to be in the first place and how they try to indoctrinate others with their beliefs is what makes me start questioning our existence for quite a while now. I know this may not sound relevant to anyone but I think it's relevant is because nothing that society is doing right now makes sense to me at all. They have these subjective views of good/bad, right/wrong, true/false, correct/incorrect that they decided to begin with and choose what's good/bad and for no particular reason other than brainwashing others into following them without knowing why other than saying it's "common sense".
That's weird to me that it would be considered easy. Easy for whom? What's easy for the spider is a PoLR hit for the fly.Well, yes, but I also took the concentration because it's generally deemed as "easy", even though I'm not doing that particularly well right now.
I'm guessing this is a metaphor of you being Te PoLR.
yeah supper hard to tell if you're SLI or ILI. i am leaning on ILI
i suggest datingdate SEE and IEE see which you jive with
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Prevalent gamma introvert vi. ESI or ILI
Seem more IP than IJ but tough to tell from interview videos. Too many variables that can be causing IP > IJ impression
I think it's kinda difficult to observe Si and Ni, as they may not be deemed as "conscious" IM elements, even though they're conscious to both the SLI and ILI.yeah supper hard to tell if you're SLI or ILI. i am leaning on ILI
i suggest dating
Dating is an interesting suggestion since it does relate to Socionics. However, I never tried it, so it will be difficult at first glance. If I get involved in a relationship however, I'd rather be it a long-term one than have multiple short-term ones leading nowhere.
I think I'm more in the IP temperament, even though I try to be more J-like sometimes, but end up not being one at all.
I guess it's the way I sat and the answers I made from the questionnaire making me more P-like I guess.
Last edited by SkyNova20; 10-24-2020 at 07:02 PM.
Interesting to see another ESI answer here.
Last edited by SkyNova20; 10-30-2020 at 01:18 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
