ILE (ENTp)
SEI (ISFp)
ESE (ESFj)
LII (INTj)
SLE (ESTp)
IEI (INFp)
EIE (ENFj)
LSI (ISTj)
SEE (ESFp)
ILI (INTp)
LIE (ENTj)
ESI (ISFj)
IEE (ENFp)
SLI (ISTp)
LSE (ESTj)
EII (INFj)
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
edits: sorry felt a bit defensive
Why can she be LIE when LIE are TeNe, with a rather casual detachment from the everyday world. Thatcher was all power hungry and a control freak, LSE are Se creative. LIE is someone like Issac Newton, who was very abstract and easily displays the Ne creative that is characteristic of LIE. I understand that if you are possibly using the wikisocion version, then the strict adherence to the Quadra values logically ends up meaning that you'd conclude someone like Thatcher to be LIE since the quadra values point to gamma being power hungry and what not.
With the energomodel LIE are people who are
Te base
Ne creative
Fe Role
Se launcher
Ni Demonstrative
Fi Manipulative
Si Break
Ti Parent
This model of socionics breaks the sacred quadra values but it more accurate than the version on wikisocion.
http://translate.googleusercontent.c...iIg1T2kLGKwxfg
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=LIE
Last edited by Soupman; 02-06-2014 at 07:44 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
probably one of the most difficult people that we've attempted to type.
I agree that:
she is unlikely to be an introvert (LSI is perhaps the only moderate possibility), unlikely to be an ethical type
also: it is difficult to see how she valued , especially in comparison to
it's also difficult to see how she valued - a HA would be more likely
I can't perceive how she would have tolerated well an IEI (not at all well I suspect)...or a SEI to a lesser extent
@Expat considered Denis Thatcher a ESI I think...it is easier to see how she would accept a IJ temperament type or even a rational type.
I think perhaps also a SLE type would be somewhat less unrelenting or at least a little more reactive and less methodological?
LSI
Originally Posted by Mitterand
Obvious LSI. My grandmother was one and she was just the same.
[] | NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
ESI-Se. She was very popular which ESI-Se tend to be and ESI-Se are the most logical ethical type. ESI's Fi can often be a fondness for certain systems and policies.
LIE is a bad typing for Thatcher because they're rarely elected leaders.
A better example of LSI in G.s gallery than say, A. Delon. Because type seems more up and front in her case.
Clearly a structured person that gives much importance to discipline and responsibility and she's always bringing it to light in this interview as the most important part of her childhood. Conversely, an IEI if raised under a strict parent but with an at least acceptable itr, would focus on the books they read or what a good person they were, for example, as the hardening and strengthening of character through truths of edifying nature is not something they would pay much attention to, but it's part of the LSI style of evangelization. In fact, self-possession, her overall presence and style and focus on order and responsibility reminds me of my LSI grandmother.
Sicuramente cercherai il significato di questo.
Yeah I agree with LSI at the moment.