-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So, at first I was all like 'this VI baloney' but then I used CSI technology and saw the N.
Nope, you are so misreading me. You don't get me. And nope, I don't want to review. It just gets worse and worse with explaining, don't you get that? I accept that we don't think alike but you do not. Its like you think its some other thing. Its not. You know what? It just looks like different uses of basic Socionics functions!
I'll go over one point, the first one. But I don't think there will be meeting of minds but I will just try this and maybe I will be wrong!
Your first point. Its NOT that I "think not" because I never asked you. I had a thought. Do you ask permission or request more information before you have a thought? I think not! I made a simple assumption based on your posts on this forum. THEN I immediately asked you. "Am I right?" In other words: "I see this about you. Correct me if I am wrong."
So all you have to do is say:
1) Yes! I have the SAME reaction to gore and porn! I am right there with you!".
Or:
2) "No, that's the not reaction I would have."
Why not just answer the question? Instead its like you want to pick a fight.
Why?
I just
do
not
get
it.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Trying to relate is so me
But she's a Static Se, held position which she does not allow to be challenged by an external force especially when she wants to uphold her (I mean HER) position. She will use any method possible because she's mobilized to achieve a goal...that may be to bring you down honey.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Eliza, Handi, SSmall, Stan and I all get along because we don't make harsh judgements of people and their positions like you do in a way that stands to discredit their authority (power dynamics much?).
YOU STARTED THIS THREAD. THIS IS THE CONTRADICTORY NATURE OF SEE WITH TI POLR
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-19-2013 at 05:32 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hum...you were right Eliza...with the post I read of hers and how she addresses you and I and what positions we hold in public it is all Se and I'm confirming with that being final. SEE.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It is estimated that 93% of communication is nonverbal. As such, it's unsurprising when there are misreadings of another's nonverbal communication. IF what you wrote here is true, then I apologize for misreading your "think not" and "type related" comments.
To answer:
Even though I have spent time observing people in different sexual practices, porn and most sexual things create 'icky' feelings in me. I can theoretically talk about sexual practices and the psychologies involved, and even joke some, but I have had to spend a lot of time desensitizing myself as an emotional protective measure. Even in romance books I usually skip the sex scenes. I have even ended relationships because I would not tolerate porn in the home.
As for gore. I'm having difficulty remembering the last movie/show i saw which had a lot of blood, deaths and such. Perhaps that vampire show with sukie? Or that "winter is coming" one...i don't remember how much gore/violence it has. I tend to ignore those parts or even roll my eyes if they are there just for gore value and not necessary to the story. I'm usually not focused on the things on the screen, but the relationships, motives, and events. I want to know why someone did something and how they felt when they did it, or when they experienced something. What is it like to be in their shoes? How will they handle the fall out? etc. The psychological aspects. I have not seen schindler's list because I thought it might be too intense psychologically for me, considering the subject matter. I've recently thought that maybe i should watch schindler's list, but if it has unnecessary violence in the story, then I probably won't. I've had no desire to see spartacus.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Actually Maritsa you do not see the woods for the trees. Trees from seeds you have planted in your own mind already. It's ok, I don't take it personally, as afore mentioned this was more an experiment to see how yours and others minds works in relation to typing people. I wanted to identify the patterns you use, most of these are emotional responses of yours just fyi. You linked me to a site which you use to identify people, a source. On that site there was a test, a test by your own admission is inaccurate. This does make your typing style appear inaccurate by proxy.
I don't want to convince you of my type at all, it's not what i was going for, i'm not trying to win an argument I'm observing in order to identify patterns.
I wonder what you think the population breakdown for types actually is? Could you give me a rough idea of what you think the breakdown percentage wise is.... it would help me understand your own criteria. I have wondered if you think only the most abstract of speakers can be Ne but then i look at people you have typed as IEE and again I'm back to thinking it really is the females you have difficulty with. You are more willing to accept males as IEE, which is interesting.
Reading Jung's descriptions I can see how there is room for interpretation but even in pure Jung I personally identify a lot of Ne users on this forum.
So anyway, I would like to converse with you on this and am most interested in your idea of how society works with socionics types. Please explain it to me now that I have your attention.
Edit: In ref to another post you made in this thread, I don't think I have addressed Eliza personally.
Edit 2: In short; The 'guy' is Mind, He is most likely ILI. A couple of people here have guessed at SLI for him (I think this is because people have seen our interaction on tinychat and guessed we were duals) and maybe one or two have suggested delta nf. He has the most obvious Ni gaze I have ever seen and I'm certain of this for my own perception. Our communication is fairly effortless we have been talking for hours on end nearly ever day for approx a year without argument and constant interest in each others conversations, we did talk a lot before that too. We have a connection that is above and beyond what I am able to describe in words which was there well before we ever met in person.I have always felt an attraction to his voice which is very soothing and have had some intangible knowing that he will be in my life for a long time.Our conversation topics are diverse.
Last edited by SyrupDeGem; 10-19-2013 at 01:50 PM.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Huxley has some very direct viewpoints on the how the world should be, just like Napoleon. I think Maritsa is confused because she doesn't understand that Huxley waits on someone else to 'act' on their viewpoints.
All of the women in this thread in my viewpoint are equally stubborn; however, being stubborn is no bad thing.
What do I win?
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Never argue with Huxley.
Yah Eliza, that will be difficult to find with any consistency.
You even identified my use of Ne, re: the porn thing, I explained it for you using Ne. The problem is you are being fed by a manipulative rewards system in which the game has become us and them. Maritsa, though she probably believes she means well causes a LOT of damage, I want to understand her system as it actually errs pretty far off the beaten track of Jung, Mbti & socionics.
You may continue to type others and I according to some bizarre system that most disagree with, it's not important to me but if you do carry on poking people they will respond. I generally respond when my values/morals are offended or called into question. Since its integral to how I perceive myself I will do this when people try to decide my type for me, as others will.
One important point is that I do not take umbridge with anybody suggesting I am another type, especially if they have a reasonable explanation as to why, I am usually interested in hearing these opinions. When somebody 'tells' me though, that's different because it is said in a light of authority. I discuss happily but I am stubborn as anything if I am told what to do, I have a rebellious streak too.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Geminatronix you look a lot like an Aggressor, I will not make further comments but you seem to be an Aggressor in intimate relationships I mean sex and stuff like that.
so I took a closer look at Gem's face after loading it up in my shiny new Adobe Photoshop C4 16 special edition 2018 (yet to be released to public). equipped with my vast never ending technological skill-set (and the shiny new SOCIONIZE TECHNOLOGY ® exclusive to the newer versions of photoshop (only available to NASA afaik, sry)) i found something very conspicuous; curious but also extremely unsettling. i advise you to stop reading right now if you have difficulty with my methods as this may only disturb you further.
supposedly if you invert the colors in the photo and chant "om namashiwaai Aushra maa ki jai" 7 times, you can see the N materialize on her face.
I KNOW, AMAZING ISN'T IT
i am lost for words. wait, no, found them. welp now that that's settled, who wants to watch me shoot golf balls out of my ass
GEM IS AN ENFP BUT SHE LOOKS 2 COOL TO BE AN N
6w7-2w3-1w2 so/sx
Copycat.
ENFP ? with this Ti-focused and intense eyes she has? Impossible for a type with Ti-PoLR.
any Gamma/Beta Aggressor type.
+
I will not make further comments as well, but what from what I can remember you were pretty outspoken when it came to "sex and stuff like that", so that would mean you're both Gamma/Beta.
You have a choice, though. Not unless you consider SLI aggressors...
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
I for one would really like to see what population distribution @Maritsa thinks the types have.
Actually, although at that period far back in time I was just trolling this forum because of the overall situation, I did say some very direct and intense things about sex in order to both make fun of this forum and to shock people.
Nevertheless, I have been considering ISTj for me, so what you're saying is not something that I disagree entirely.
EDIT: Plus, then being ISTj, I will be an Aggressor along with Geminatronix, we will possess each other in sadistic manners and we will be happy like you, boring Caregiver, will never be, haha!!!
Last edited by Absurd; 10-20-2013 at 09:46 AM.
@Maritsa still waiting for some stuff about type distribution
Yah, i feel quite sad because i do put in a lot of energy into my interaction with Maritsa and answer any questions she has. But when I ask her for information regarding her own hypothesis and theories she clams up. @Maritsa, you have the spotlight, time to shine some light on this.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Johari/Nohari
"Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."
Fruit, the fluffy kitty.
At first I was happy because there were pictures of pretty Gem but now I see it's turned into yet another bout of Delta NF™ against the world. Boo.
Anyway, I know nothing of VI so I will desist from saying your profile looks static or whatever.
/helpful
Last edited by SyrupDeGem; 03-18-2014 at 06:58 PM.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
I have been watching this thread and all I see, not from what you write in your posts, but from your actions, is Se. From the way you started this post, to your reasons for starting the post.