Hi all, I've been working on a sheet lately.
I tried to rate all the 16 Intertype Relations taking into account the Dimensionality of Functions.
First, I took the inverted Model A of the first partner [which basically represents how much the first partner needs each function, from 4 (Suggestive) to -4 (Point of Least Resistance] and then the natural Model A of the second partner (how much of each function the second partner has to offer to the first partner).
Then I multiplied the two Dimensionality numbers of each Information Element, which gave some kind of "combined Model A" of the two types, where each Information Element could have a score between 16 and -16.
I finally summed up the 8 numbers of the "combined Model A" to obtain a final score of the relation. The greater the score, the better the relation. The final score range is from 60 to -60.
This is what I got, in a nutshell:
Dual |
60 |
Activator |
56 |
Mirror |
44 |
Identical |
40 |
Semi-Dual |
8 |
Benefactor |
8 |
Illusionary |
8 |
Beneficiary |
8 |
Business |
-8 |
Supervisee |
-8 |
Kindred |
-8 |
Supervisor |
-8 |
Quasi-Identical |
-40 |
Contrary |
-44 |
Super-Ego |
-56 |
Conflictor |
-60 |
If you're interested, check out the attached PDF where you can find all the calculations.
What do you think? Can you relate? Don't be afraid to ask if something is unclear.
Hope you like it.