Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Which Types are These?

  1. #1
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Which Types are These?

    Type 1: Whether they are in law, management, academia, to this type, other people are basically just cockroaches to step on. They will stoop to the most underhanded means necessary to get their way. Whether it's stabbing people in the back when they are not looking, or "getting even" when someone can't defend themselves. Then, when the tables are turned, their motto is "have mercy for me" in the most servile way - when they don't have mercy for anyone else...

    Type 2: Someone else is the most despicable, underhanded person possible, but to this type they are "deserving of mercy" because "they have problems" - regardless of their situation. OTOH, for the people that are victimized, nothing is said by this type, nothing is done, not even a single thought is put into helping anyone else, but the person victimizing others is always "innocent" and "in need of help."

    Type 3: I am loud, attention-grabbing person. Often sexually promiscuous. I have the same issues as type 1. I will stoop to any means necessary to stab someone in the back, but when the tables are turned I act like I'm innocent. If the finger is pointed at me, it's the same stuff that "I didn't do it" or "please have mercy for me!"

    Type 4: I am big-time beaureaucrat. My life is just filled with all of these rules-of-thumb. However, I don't have a drop of creativity and couldn't think outside-the-box if my life depended on it. I have the same problem as type 1, where I come down hard on people and could care less about it... (Think of the airport manager from the movie "The Terminal")

    These are four types I sometimes run into. I am just curious what their socionics types are...
    Last edited by jason_m; 02-06-2019 at 11:16 AM.

  2. #2
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,724
    Mentioned
    250 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. Jerk
    2. Jerk
    3. Jerk
    4. Jerk
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  3. #3
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well...someone doesn't like Se

    Types 1 is some pastiche of Se valuing types. Your problem seems to be how they seek success at any cost, and treat themselves differently from others, which is opposed to NeSi(+Ti). There might be a bit of Fi in there too.

    Type 2 might be some Se valuer other than Se leading, such as Beta NF or ESI.

    Type 3 might be specifically Se leading or EIE.

    Type 4 - LSI probably.

  4. #4
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,724
    Mentioned
    250 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Well...someone doesn't like Se

    Types 1 is some pastiche of Se valuing types. Your problem seems to be how they seek success at any cost, and treat themselves differently from others, which is opposed to NeSi(+Ti). There might be a bit of Fi in there too.

    Type 2 might be some Se valuer other than Se leading, such as Beta NF or ESI.

    Type 3 might be specifically Se leading or EIE.

    Type 4 - LSI probably.
    I think you remain under an impression that Se = shithead. It doesn’t.
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  5. #5
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,228
    Mentioned
    1553 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden View Post
    I think you remain under an impression that Se = shithead. It doesn’t.
    That would be Sh, not Se.

  6. #6
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden View Post
    I think you remain under an impression that Se = shithead. It doesn’t.
    No but the information provided is more specific than that. We already had this conversation.

  7. #7
    Danali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    U.K
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    209
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the first one is obviously some sort of Fi valuing type


  8. #8
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. Your dad
    2. Your mom
    3. Your sister
    4. Your brother


    Seriously they sound unidimensionally developed individuals.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  9. #9
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danali View Post
    the first one is obviously some sort of Fi valuing type

    I think the OP is posting their own judgments (Fi) of how they see these people. It is a subjective evaluation of people they dislike. Therefore they can't be typed based on a paragraph of OP's values judgments. I think it says more about the OP's preferences than anything.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  10. #10
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I think the OP is posting their own judgments (Fi) of how they see these people. It is a subjective evaluation of people they dislike. Therefore they can't be typed based on a paragraph of OP's values judgments. I think it says more about the OP's preferences than anything.
    Even as Se-PoLR, there are a whole bunch of Se-egos that I like: Jason Statham, ("World's Smartest Man") Christopher Langan, Dwayne Johnson, John Cena, basketball player "Birdman," football coach Mike Singletary, even Liam Neeson - "Taken" is one of my all-time favourite movies. And then the sexy, outspoken E7 Se types: Katy Perry, Madonna, Kate Winslet, Megan Fox, etc. I just simply cannot stand someone who is a complete a**hole. I therefore cannot stand: a lot of Robert De Niro's characters (e.g., "Taxi Driver", "Raging Bull"), Gordon Ramsay, 'Judge Judy,' 'Miss Daisy,' 'Anton Chighurr' from "No Country for Old Men" and 'Alonzo Harris' from "Training Day." And there are people who are not traditionally Se who I cannot stand. For instance, the personalities of Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman are very close to me and their philosophies could not be more sickening...

    Therefore: 1) with all of those examples I have given, I don't think it is simply about Se. 2) As an 'Alpha NT,' and therefore a logical, creative person, am I expected to watch "No Country for Old Men" and feel absolutely nothing? I mean, am I supposed to be a cold-blooded sociopath? That is almost what is expected...

    I also remember the when I studied the MBTI. It was always the "thinking types" that I minded - the ones associated with cruelty and abuse, but I couldn't explain why I liked a lot of the ENTPs and INTPs. "But aren't they thinking types just like those other abusive types?" It didn't compute.

    In fact, every one of the a**hole's mentioned - "thinking types" under the old rubric.

    And now the same thing with 'Se': "How are Jason Statham Anton Chighurr alike? I like Statham. I cannot stand "No Country for Old men." How are they both 'Se'?"

    Do you see what I'm getting at?

    Whatever the real nature of this function is, it just floats from one Jungian function to the next, without anyone being able to pinpoint what it really is...

    I can just see it in the next theory, it's just going to be the same thing again with a different function. And I will once again be 'Fi-PoLR' or 'Ti-PoLR' or whatever...
    Last edited by jason_m; 02-08-2019 at 09:54 AM.

  11. #11
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @jason_m you seem to have a similar confusion. You dislike a particular manifestation of Se - not Se in general. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

  12. #12
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Even as Se-PoLR, there are a whole bunch of Se-egos that I like: Jason Statham, ("World's Smartest Man") Christopher Langan, Dwayne Johnson, John Cena, basketball player "Birdman," football coach Mike Singletary, even Liam Neeson - "Taken" is one of my all-time favourite movies. And then the sexy, outspoken E7 Se types: Katy Perry, Madonna, Kate Winslet, Megan Fox, etc. I just simply cannot stand someone who is a complete a**hole. I therefore cannot stand: a lot of Robert De Niro's characters (e.g., "Taxi Driver", "Raging Bull"), Gordon Ramsay, 'Judge Judy,' 'Miss Daisy,' 'Anton Chighurr' from "No Country for Old Men" and 'Alonzo Harris' from "Training Day." And there are people who are not traditionally Se who I cannot stand. For instance, the personalities of Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman are very close to me and their philosophies could not be more sickening...

    Therefore: 1) with all of those examples I have given, I don't think it is simply about Se. 2) As an 'Alpha NT,' and therefore a logical, creative person, am I expected to watch "No Country for Old Men" and feel absolutely nothing? I mean, am I supposed to be a cold-blooded sociopath? That is almost what is expected...

    I also remember the when I studied the MBTI. It was always the "thinking types" that I minded - the ones associated with cruelty and abuse, but I couldn't explain why I liked a lot of the ENTPs and INTPs. "But aren't they thinking types just like those other abusive types?" It didn't compute.

    In fact, every one of the a**hole's mentioned - "thinking types" under the old rubric.

    And now the same thing with 'Se': "How are Jason Statham Anton Chighurr alike? I like Statham. I cannot stand "No Country for Old men." How are they both 'Se'?"

    Do you see what I'm getting at?

    Whatever the real nature of this function is, it just floats from one Jungian function to the next, without anyone being able to pinpoint what it really is...

    I can just see it in the next theory, it's just going to be the same thing again with a different function. And I will once again be 'Fi-PoLR' or 'Ti-PoLR' or whatever...
    When I said it said more about you I was not attempting to type you anything specific. I was noting you have a particular worldview that does affect how you describe other people. If we asked the friends of those people it is very possible another "type" would be described. See what I mean? What you were expressing looked like Fi which all people use in some form. I have seen your posts over the years so this is not the first time I have noticed the way you have described others. I didn't say anything about you disliking Se, that was @thehotelambush.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  13. #13
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    @jason_m you seem to have a similar confusion. You dislike a particular manifestation of Se - not Se in general. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
    I find that this is the case for almost every type or function. For instance, almost everyone who has been typed ILE as a consensus I like, but there are still exceptions. Gammas I often don't like, but there are many exceptions. There are betas I like and betas I don't like. It seems like every function I either value/don't value simply has a manifestation that I value/don't value and that's it... I simply could not make the theory fit if it were not this way, so there are plenty of exceptions...

  14. #14
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    When I said it said more about you I was not attempting to type you anything specific. I was noting you have a particular worldview that does affect how you describe other people. If we asked the friends of those people it is very possible another "type" would be described. See what I mean? What you were expressing looked like Fi which all people use in some form. I have seen your posts over the years so this is not the first time I have noticed the way you have described others. I didn't say anything about you disliking Se, that was @thehotelambush.
    Okay. Nevermind.

  15. #15
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Okay. Nevermind.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  16. #16
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    I find that this is the case for almost every type or function. For instance, almost everyone who has been typed ILE as a consensus I like, but there are still exceptions. Gammas I often don't like, but there are many exceptions. There are betas I like and betas I don't like. It seems like every function I either value/don't value simply has a manifestation that I value/don't value and that's it... I simply could not make the theory fit if it were not this way, so there are plenty of exceptions...
    Yeah, that's true about the whole theory. Human relationships are messy and involve other factors than socionics.

  17. #17
    Chthonic Daydream's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    The Snail Spiral
    Posts
    1,245
    Mentioned
    171 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    Human relationships are messy and involve other factors than socionics.
    "If you ever get close to a human
    And human behavior
    Be ready, be ready to get confused
    And me and my hereafter
    There's definitely, definitely, definitely no logic
    To human behavior"

    “I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
    Clarice Lispector

  18. #18
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    #Bigtimebeaureaucrat

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Colorado
    TIM
    IEI-Fe0
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    get this off the site

  20. #20
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Babooshka View Post
    "If you ever get close to a human
    And human behavior
    Be ready, be ready to get confused
    And me and my hereafter
    There's definitely, definitely, definitely no logic
    To human behavior"
    I think she implies that in order to describe process of being human is set of processes that makes things very jumbled up on top of that our bodies (maybe frequently) misfires signals while detectors that we also have are faulty and lacking in resolution in order to keep us functional [keeping energy consumption in check] enough in biological framework which also evolves quite slowly.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by golden View Post
    1. Jerk
    2. Jerk
    3. Jerk
    4. Jerk
    at least, someones should be not EIE

  22. #22
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ruined View Post
    get this off the site
    Why? Should this be insulting to someone here?

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Colorado
    TIM
    IEI-Fe0
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Why? Should this be insulting to someone here?
    it could be, but no i was just kidding

  24. #24
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ruined View Post
    it could be, but no i was just kidding
    Sorry, lol.

  25. #25
    The Neighborhood Witch Nocturne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    TIM
    ESI Sx 4
    Posts
    143
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oof ouch, the bias coming through this post stingsssss.

    Are you a Delta?
    𝒯𝒶𝓊𝓇𝓊𝓈 ☼ | 𝒞𝒶𝓅𝓇𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓇𝓃 ☾ | 𝒮𝒸𝑜𝓇𝓅𝒾𝑜 ↑
    ~ 𝒮𝓁𝓎𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓇𝒾𝓃 ~






Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •