Perhaps ...
Fe = !
Si = ,
Ne = ?
Ti = ()
Te = :
Ni = ...
Fi = ;
Se = .
:-p
Perhaps ...
Fe = !
Si = ,
Ne = ?
Ti = ()
Te = :
Ni = ...
Fi = ;
Se = .
:-p
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Holy crap my brain. I have just spent the last 2 hours proof reading and then stumble upon this. Bleh. Mind you those two hours were 3-5pm, Friday afternoon. Sweet fucking freedom!
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
I like this
I don't know about the comma for Si, but the Fi one makes particular sense to me -- the two sentences are related -- sibling sentences -- so they are separated by the semicolon; it helps w flow if one sentence adds nicely to the other and serves as a visual cue to the reader that what's coming next will be directly related or give more info or description.
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra
I can't remember when I used semicolon.
Why is it even important...?
-Parens are Ne too - it essentially lets you go off on a tangent in the middle of what you're writing.
-Comma is probably closest to Te but it's pretty neutral.
-Somewhat agree with Se, at least using lots of short, punchy sentences is typical of Se ego writing.
-! can be Se too obviously. I find Fe leadings tend to use a single exclamation point only.
-Ni would be semicolon or some other obscure one But seriously, IEI writers love their long complex sentences.
-? can be Ni too
-Fi, Si, and Ti probably don't have good equivalents. Then again syntax as a whole is Ti.
I have a huge love for semicolons and have never met another person who uses them as much in essays. As well as this - mark thing