Page 24 of 56 FirstFirst ... 1420212223242526272834 ... LastLast
Results 921 to 960 of 2205

Thread: Gulenko's typings of forum members AKA Big G SquaD

  1. #921
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Identical twins always have different personality type. Always.

    In this particular case one of them is ESTP and the other one is ENFJ. This is activity intertype relationship.



    The one with the eyeliner is the ESTP. The one with the brush is the ENFJ.
    Last edited by khcs; 02-12-2021 at 07:19 PM.
    This is the comment you are looking for



  2. #922
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khcs View Post
    Identical twins always have different personality type. Always.

    In this particular case one of them is ESTP and the other one is ENFJ. This is activity intertype relationship.



    The one with the eyeliner is the ESTP. The one with the brush is the ENFJ.
    LMAO

  3. #923
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The other solution is slightly different.

    The father may be an INFP which eliminates the possibility of an ESTP daughter.

    The one with the eyeliner can be an ENTJ. The one with the brush is the ENFJ. That would be business intertype relationship.

    Last edited by khcs; 02-12-2021 at 10:08 PM.
    This is the comment you are looking for



  4. #924
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ id like to add that the ENTJ girl has clearly a bit darker hair than the other. can you see it too @khcs ?

  5. #925
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    ^ id like to add that the ENTJ girl has clearly a bit darker hair than the other.
    The one with a slightly darker voice seem to be the ENTJ.
    This is the comment you are looking for



  6. #926
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khcs View Post
    The one with a slightly darker voice seem to be the ENTJ.
    Now that I think of it, the other girl is ESFJ.

  7. #927
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    identical twins seem like an interesting research project that I don't have the time for right now. might really prove the theory that types are inborn and determined by your genetics. I remember watching a documentary some years ago about the topic, quite fascinating. I even found the link (it's in german, though). looking at it now, I think both are EIE, they work as artists.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WiD...ature=youtu.be
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  8. #928
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sachmet View Post
    May I ask why did you think so? While I was reading through Gulenko's website material, I felt harmonizing or creative subtype would be a better fit for me. However, I'm not familiar very much with DCNH theory yet, so I'm not discarding this possibility..

    If you are interested, I could send you link with a part of my video I sent to Gulenko. Not ready to share it publicly. Not after those mean comments I get here ;-) In fact, I'm considering to remove my video I shared, so if you want to rewatch it, please do so quickly... :-D
    I can't really explain why I came to that conclusion. I generally pay attention to how people communicate, their manner of speech. I try to see if they are a contact or distant subtype, because D and C have accentuated extroverted functions, so their way of communication is more direct or fluently.
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  9. #929
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    If uve got a red car and u scratch it, its not a red car anymore?
    It's not the same object.

  10. #930
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    and how does this change personality or dna?
    You still haven't explained what you mean by "personality".

    But according to studies with Big Five traits: "Twin studies and other research have shown that about half of the variation between individuals results from their genetic inheritance and half from their environment. Researchers have found conscientiousness, extraversion, openness to experience, and neuroticism to be relatively stable from childhood through adulthood."

  11. #931
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    You still haven't explained what you mean by "personality".

    But according to studies with Big Five traits: "Twin studies and other research have shown that about half of the variation between individuals results from their genetic inheritance and half from their environment. Researchers have found conscientiousness, extraversion, openness to experience, and neuroticism to be relatively stable from childhood through adulthood."

    Big Five traits are in fact identical to the Jungian functions. They mixed up these functions in order to deceive you.
    This is the comment you are looking for



  12. #932
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    You still haven't explained what you mean by "personality".

    But according to studies with Big Five traits: "Twin studies and other research have shown that about half of the variation between individuals results from their genetic inheritance and half from their environment. Researchers have found conscientiousness, extraversion, openness to experience, and neuroticism to be relatively stable from childhood through adulthood."
    Exactly. So its inborn mate. I said personality is your personality type enneagram/socionics/mbti.

  13. #933
    khcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,533
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Enneagram deals with personality traits and not personality types. So it is something different. Socionics and MBTI are the same thing.

    Well, it is possible to describe a type with Enneagram traits. It is more precise when personality types are described by the Jungian functions.
    This is the comment you are looking for



  14. #934
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    Exactly. So its inborn mate. I said personality is your personality type enneagram/socionics/mbti.
    Half of it, maybe bro.

  15. #935
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khcs View Post
    Big Five traits are in fact identical to the Jungian functions. They mixed up these functions in order to deceive you.
    Do you have any actual evidence either way?

  16. #936
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    Do you have any actual evidence either way?
    extraversion is the only jungian dichotomy that the big five uses, and they use it in a very different way. you could say that openess relates to intuitive functions, agreeableness to ethical functions, conscientiousness to being a normalising subtype, but then again, big five measures these traits very differently. neuroticism isn't even covered in socionics. khcs lives in an imaginative world where facts don't really exist, you won't get any evidence for his ridiculous claims. he showcases Te as vulnerable function very well though. 2+2=5, but the sad thing is he actually thinks he's correct. reminds me of the people who think that the earth is flat.
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  17. #937
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    Do you have any actual evidence either way?
    that feel when u have no brain to figure shit out urself

  18. #938
    💩 Nobody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    TIM
    POOP™
    Posts
    439
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    extraversion is the only jungian dichotomy that the big five uses, and they use it in a very different way. you could say that openess relates to intuitive functions, agreeableness to ethical functions, conscientiousness to being a normalising subtype, but then again, big five measures these traits very differently. neuroticism isn't even covered in socionics. khcs lives in an imaginative world where facts don't really exist, you won't get any evidence for his ridiculous claims. he showcases Te as vulnerable function very well though. 2+2=5, but the sad thing is he actually thinks he's correct. reminds me of the people who think that the earth is flat.
    How is it fundamentally all that different though? Sure, I know some people might say that it's statistical and that the dichotomies could be defined a little different. But for example, I think it's probably something like this

    openness = irrationality (S or N, depending). I think S types can be more open to the depth of experiencing things, while N is more open to breadth.
    agreeable = Probably high correlation to F as a whole, since F types are going to be more sensitive and nuanced on F type stuff. It just doesn't make a lot of sense otherwise for someone good at F to conflict with everybody. Unless perhaps they are neurotic.
    conscientious = rationality just makes sense because it requires premeditation. Irrationality perceives.
    neuroticism = affectively Jungian neuroticism, which still applies to sociotypes because they are Jungian based. So a neurotic F type might not be very agreeable when showing neurotic elements. Someone like Jordan Peterson, for example, strikes me as agreeable when he's comfortable that becomes a lot more argumentative and disagreeable when things don't make sense to him and he thinks people are being illogical. I think T types have the opposite problem where they are fine conflicting with people, as long as it works for them, but when it doesn't, they want badly to find a way to make amends. It's like they are children that push the limits too far and get caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

    which is pretty damn close.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    Just rename this place Beta Central lmao
    Quote Originally Posted by MidnightWilderness View Post
    The only problem socionics has given me is a propensity to analyze every relationship from the lens of socionics and I also see that it is worse in my boyfriend. Nothing makes any sense that way and it does not really solve any problems.





  19. #939
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gukenko made a comment on the big five in an interview that I translated a couple of years ago.

    http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.p...Victor_Gulenko

    3. How does The Big 5 relate to neuroticism index?


    The basic scale of The Big 5 can relate to socionics, as there are a lot of similiarities. The first factor is extroversion, which correlates to socionics extroversion. It is the first noticeable, "on the surface" trait. The second factor is openness, which is when a person is open to new things, which correlates to socionics intuition. The third factor is conscientiousness, which relates to socionics rationality. The fourth factor is agreeableness, which means that you will agree with society's standards, which correlates with socionics ethics, especially ethics of relationships, which is introverted feeling. The last factor is emotional stability, which was discovered later. It doesn't relate to Aushra or Jung's dichotomies, but Gulenko discovered that it could relate to a DCNH subtype dichotomy called terminality. It is is about how well you adapt emotionally, and see your goals through to the end without being swayed emotionally.


    this question covers the other topic that we are talking about:

    1. Is type innate? If so, at what age does type become set and can be observed? If not, what affects one's typing?


    The type is innate, but its energy and information are filled gradually. You can observe the type from the day the child is born. Somehow, this type you can already observe within the first years of child development, and one child will be loud and whiny, another will be calm, third will be careful and fearful, the fourth will be brave and climbs everything and so on, so that means that there's already a type in somebody's person, so you can observe it from very early age. I spend a lot of time and energy to counsel children and their parents, and can confirm that you can distinguish a child's type at the age of 3 or 4, but of course you will also need to ask a questions of the child and parents, and not just by observing the behavior. How to observe the type: type is the stable psychological structure of the person, and it manifests itself via various reactions in our brain. Unfortunately, we don't have such a device to research how our brain works. We don't have some kind of constant attached X-ray to our brains to monitor such spontaneous reactions, so you can instead observe the behavior of the person to detect the type. This is also how you can detect a type: you divide a group into two groups. For example extroverts and introverts and you give them the same task. Distantly you observe the differences of task implementation. Only with this contrast you can see the difference clearly.
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  20. #940
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    extraversion is the only jungian dichotomy that the big five uses, and they use it in a very different way. you could say that openess relates to intuitive functions, agreeableness to ethical functions, conscientiousness to being a normalising subtype, but then again, big five measures these traits very differently. neuroticism isn't even covered in socionics. khcs lives in an imaginative world where facts don't really exist, you won't get any evidence for his ridiculous claims. he showcases Te as vulnerable function very well though. 2+2=5, but the sad thing is he actually thinks he's correct. reminds me of the people who think that the earth is flat.
    I think there is some correlation as you mention, but @khcs seems to be acting as though there is absolutely none, while @Number 9 large places no value on evidence.

  21. #941
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    that feel when u have no brain to figure shit out urself
    How would you know you aren't capable of figuring shit out if you don't value evidence?

  22. #942
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    How would you know you aren't capable of figuring shit out if you don't value evidence?
    Because if things are true they will be logically sound from every angle to one another.

  23. #943
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    Because if things are true they will be logically sound from every angle to one another.
    Things can be internally consistent and still be absolutely wrong.

  24. #944
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    Things can be internally consistent and still be absolutely wrong.
    You only need a few anchors

  25. #945
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    Things can be internally consistent and still be absolutely wrong.
    There can also be contrary evidence

  26. #946

  27. #947
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    There can also be contrary evidence
    I'm not sure I understand you. There can be an incomplete understanding, certainly.

  28. #948
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    I don't think it's wise to rely on assumptions.
    I said anchors not assumptions

  29. #949
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    I'm not sure I understand you. There can be an incomplete understanding, certainly.
    Evidence that contradict eachother

  30. #950
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    seems like a discussion between a Ti valuing type and Te valuing type, and as a Ti-dom, I understand Number 9's perspective.
    @Subteigh: have you read this EII desciption?

    http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.p..._EII_composite

    I thought about the comment on role Ti a couple of times when I read some of your comments on this site.
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  31. #951
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Im pretty sure Subteigh is a Te user. Nowhere has he said his personal values or tried to give his subjective opinion. Its always facts facts facts.

  32. #952
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    Im pretty sure Subteigh is a Te user. Nowhere has he said his personal values or tried to give his subjective opinion. Its always facts facts facts.
    I've had many discussions with him in chat and I'm quite convinced he is an EII. we are quite similar in many ways. the major difference between us is him focusing more on data and statistics.
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  33. #953
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ti just looks for a general direction that it can work with, while Te strives for objective knowledge. for example, Ti might observe the pattern that ethical men and logical women are more likely to be homosexual. just patterns and the generalalisations. Te on the other hand might disregard this claim unless there have been studies done and data has been collected. same with socionics, which is a field that is dominated by Ti valuing types, while the scientific community is mostly dominated by Te valuing types. they disregard speculative theories, and Ti doesn't care to objectively prove it.
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  34. #954
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I've had many discussions with him in chat and I'm quite convinced he is an EII. we are quite similar in many ways. the major difference between us is him focusing more on data and statistics.
    what Fi lead focuses on data and statistics idiot? this fucking ''Subteigh = EII'' myth needs to fucking die.

  35. #955
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    I said anchors not assumptions
    How does that differ from assumptions, in your definition?

    I said "Things can be internally consistent and still be absolutely wrong.", and you said I only need a few anchors, as though I only need to hold a few things to be self-evident.

  36. #956
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    Evidence that contradict eachother
    Depends on what you mean by evidence.

    It seems here I use it to mean "fact", while you use it to mean "interpretation".

  37. #957
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    Ti just looks for a general direction that it can work with, while Te strives for objective knowledge. for example, Ti might observe the pattern that ethical men and logical women are more likely to be homosexual. just patterns and the generalalisations. Te on the other hand might disregard this claim unless there have been studies done and data has been collected. same with socionics, which is a field that is dominated by Ti valuing types, while the scientific community is mostly dominated by Te valuing types. they disregard speculative theories, and Ti doesn't care to objectively prove it.
    I can only really say I'm an INXX type at the moment, and that for me, I find typologies like Socionics as only being able to tell me what I already know about myself.

  38. #958
    Professional IEI Identifier on a peaceful hiatus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,366
    Mentioned
    259 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    what Fi lead focuses on data and statistics idiot? this fucking ''Subteigh = EII'' myth needs to fucking die.
    you're really irritating. you can't comprehend what other people are talking about, yet you constantly insult them.
    my ideas about socionics:

    https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/

    the section will be updated ever other month or so.

    this is a VI thread with IEI examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)

    and this is a thread with EIE examples

    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples

  39. #959
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    you're really irritating. you can't comprehend what other people are talking about, yet you constantly insult them.
    youre fucking stupid. give me back ur LII badge

  40. #960
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,404
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    clearly didnt think about this shit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •