I sincerely dont understand anything of what uve just said lolOriginally Posted by Scarper
but yeah, I guess your conclusion about my friend's type based on the one line comment I made is far more accurate than the tests they made... deffo.
ILI-Ni
ILI-Te
SLE-Se
SLE-Ti
LSI-Se
LSI-Ti
LII-Ti
LII-Ne
ILE-Ne
ILE-Ti
ESE-Fe
ESE-Si
SEI-Si
SEI-Fe
IEI-Fe
IEI-Ni
EIE-Fe
EIE-Ni
SEE-Se
SEE-Fi
ESI-Fi
ESI-Se
LIE-Te
LIE-Ni
IEE-Fi
IEE-Ne
EII-Ne
EII-Fi
SLI-Te
SLI-Si
LSE-Te
LSE-Si
I sincerely dont understand anything of what uve just said lol
but yeah, I guess your conclusion about my friend's type based on the one line comment I made is far more accurate than the tests they made... deffo.
anyway the SEEs I know would never do this, they tend to be surprisingly organized in the most petty things... (Gamma management skills? IDK but same happens for the ESIs I know)You've moved from plural, to singular, to "lol". Hard to imagine ESI's being illogical in the way you are, or being so fond of Fe. What do you normally score in tests, or scored before you sat many?
yeah and u moved from making no sense to address my type to make your point? something substancial or is just ur butt itching hard?
(lol does not define quantity anyway)
just to explain, I'm sure I know a couple of SEE in real life but only one of them actually compiled a test and scored SEE. He was the person I referred to, although the other I suspect to be SEEs are as petty as he is.
You could be SEE. It's way more likely than LSI.
My first impression from the video was SEE (but I am new here and I am not familiar with anyone!)
There is something about you that reminds me of two dear friends of mine (both I type as SEE/ESFP). The one you remind me of the most in this video, is similar to when he used to get bored, or when he was feeling down (past tense because unfortunately he passed away a year a go). When he was excited and at his best he was energised and so full of life, it was beautiful and very inspiring to see. He would drag me on adventures with him and although I very much enjoyed the mental stimulation I could not keep up with him physically! Most of the time people saw this side to him. However, he also had another more serious side, and was capable of feeling incredibly deeply about the things and the people he loved and cared about. Similarly, my other SEE friend was like this too. They both loved to throw themselves into life, to embrace everything, to enjoy themselves, and to live authentically. The ESFP embodies this like no other type, imo.
Trust issues etc, can be an indication of many different things so I am reluctant to relate that specifically to type. I guess the question is whether this is a core aspect of your personality or whether it might be a learned defence/survival mechanism that developed due to life experiences (I struggle with these things too and I know a lot of this is due to things that have happened to me as opposed to type, for example).
The other two types I have seen mentioned is Beta ST or Alpha NT but I am finding it harder to perceive these (but I am only going from one video and I have never spoken to you, lol).
Anyway, I am literally just thinking aloud here! >_>
Well, SEE it seems after all. Quite possibly.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Do the 500 questions test and get rid of your doubts.
tl;dr?Do the 500 questions test and get rid of your doubts.
I was joking. But I'm sincerely curious to see what would you score if ever you attempt to answer that long test.tl;dr?
It took me like 3 days btw. I'm awful at keeping my attention in stuff for several hours. I hate forcing myself to do such because I start to feel really anxious, annoyed and impatient.
Anyway there is a shorter version translated in another site.
My typing of you hasn't changed, btw.
Last edited by Hope; 01-23-2018 at 12:26 AM.
This test http://www.socionics.com/sta/sta-1-r.html?0::: is much better than the 500 hundred questions.
You're looking at selecting about 120-180 answers, and you can save your progress at any point and come back to it.
Also - you get a scoring factor, too close to .8 means you are aware of how tests work and are being biased. Approach it like you know nothing - my conf factor was I think .66 and it gave SLI.
No one would go through 500 questions IMO if they had any sense
Anyway, I think you know yourself for SEE, so it's all good.
Where do people see SEE from the video? LSI-Se fits well imo.
I gave my reasons, and so did he, you saying he's a type doesn't make it true.
To me, LSI doesn't seem to fit because he strikes me as irrational (type) over rational in that video (his overall temperament seemed Ep over Ij). I really know nothing with regards the sub-type stuff and all the other add-on theories so I really couldn't comment on LSI-Se as an alternative suggestion.
I am wary of the trap of restructuring the theory too much in order to account for all inconsistencies. The types are really just prototypes and are not intended to interpret reality exactly (the map is not the territory and all that). There is huge number of ways human behaviour and cognition can be interpreted and Sociotype is just one (and, imo, can only really explains fragments of our complex identities).
That said, I am not saying he definitely is an SEE, I'm just throwing out ideas. I learn as I go along. ^_^
Reasons for behing Ethical yeah. What's so terrible about typing as IEI I wonder.
PS: I still won't have much time for the forum for a while, but I'll try to get back to this thread later. Didn't read all of the posts yet.
IEI is fascinating suggestion.
IEI examples
https://vimeo.com/141331779
High irrationality and maybe bit dominant traits.Both SEE and IEI can spin people around them for example just bit differently.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Where is 4d Fe of SEE, if somebody would care to explain? Him being logical is the thing that stands out the most.
I hated school so much I skipped going to college at all lol. The rules, schoolwork and being forced to sit down and be an obedient bitch towards condescending staff were complete and utter torture for me.
Screenshot_20180124-140650.jpg
Screenshot_20180124-140638.jpg
Yea i doubt this is accurate but..
Any idea what ya PoLR is?
It shows you are still trying to find yourself, hence the fluctuating test results. I find it interesting btw how your Ni didn't go low even though you tried to "pull" Se as high as possible.
deleted. Sorry, it was not relevant (just my random ramblings)
Last edited by CrossRoads; 01-25-2018 at 03:07 AM.
Well if i was SEE it would be ti. any way u know it manifests?
Sorry >_>
Last edited by CrossRoads; 01-25-2018 at 07:05 AM.
Sorry >_>
Last edited by CrossRoads; 01-25-2018 at 07:05 AM.
What you get in the sociotype original test? That one never fails for me.
http://www.sociotype.com/tests/
I used to think that you were an ILI and now you type yourself as SEE. That's very strange.
Anyway, by watching your video, I mostly get Se vibes. My guess is SEE or SLE.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
Yeah he's just in that phase of trying to figure out things about himself.I used to think that you were an ILI and now you type yourself as SEE. That's very strange.
In the end ill type myself iei dont worry m8
And we can live happily ever after @Myst
I'm not worried. I wish you good luck to your self-discovery.
I'm not SLE
Ok, so you have self typed LSI, SEE, and now SLE
I still put my bet on D-LSI. Based on the video, that's all I know.
SLEs are often much more elaborate. They try to explain things and get entangled in the explanations. That Ti creative.
You just seem like an introvert (in the video)
Some people mentioned that you move around alot. But SxEs don't move around alot. They have accepting, base Se.
You talk about trust. Indicates super-ego Fi.
Hope you'll find your type.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
hey tallmo can you go into more on how accepting and producing manifest in relation to perceiving functions
It seems to me that the creative function shows itself more explicitly than the base function. Comparing SEI and ESE, then SEI often doesnt show any explicit Si at all. You just have to guess that it's there, while ESE can show it "oh, look at that nice ice-cream, now, take that spoon and eat your food". "here is a comfortable pillow for you" etc.
I'm not the right person to make generalizations, but one should be careful not to pay too much attention to explicit things and then rationalize them as the base function.
I understand it like something like this:
Base function: "how things are to me, my whole world"
Creative function: "what I can do / what I show"
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
can you go more into how that works with Se, so like SLE would be less overtly power sensitive than LSI/ESI?
what about ethical base, what does base Fe look like compared to demonstrative compared to creative
Interesting. I was just thinking about my "lil" cousin who's turning 18 in a month. Anyway, it's like I don't know him. He's the most taciturn person I know, literally. In a family lunch, or even while hanging with us other cousins, he's mostly quiet, except he laughs at the silliest jokes that my ESE cousin always makes. And he's even pretty much a prankster himself and hangs with all sort of groups of friends, mostly all older than himself.
Yesterday my uncle was having lunch with my dad and I and he told us how my "lil" cousin is such an extrovert and is into all sorts of activities (he plays box, soccer, swims in the winter, and sails the seas during the summer...!)... he's even pretty popular among girls (actually he's always been, and used to collect love stories since I can even remember, like he was 4 or 5!) and he's rather hot, blond curls, fit, green eyes... and he always has this smirk on his face anyway... IDK where he comes from.
All of this is really the opposite when you're one on one with him alone though, he's really just quiet... but not shy. I think he doesn't ponder about life the way introverts do... but he's smart enough to keep his mouth shut and just enjoy what comes... Se way~
I thought he was a SLE.
Ooh thats flattering
My first impression of you when i saw a pic in the members thread was that you reminded me of Ashton (i think he self-typed LIE). But now that i see the few minutes of video i'm a bit thrown off. This isn't much to go by, but was having a hard time pinpointing specifics that could lead me to type.
Do you see anything of Exxj temperament in yourself?
Pretty sure im p type
Wow this is the first time I've seen you on video. I honestly think LSI is possible, it's just that you seem like you're on crack. Some kind of Se ego definitely.
Thanx maybe ill make another video. Crack is correct
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote