I disagree. We're already able to pretty much cure anything but unfortunately there are some people in this world who go out of their way to create diseases for the masses.
Hell no. Absolutely not. To contemplate that is not to understand the cycle of life. To not understand our role in this world. I'm just happy to be alive today and enjoying my time here. I don't need any extra time.
It's funny. Time is what we always wish we had more of, and yet we waste it the most, yes?
P.S. Sidenote - where did the twerpy age of 20 come from? Why are people saying they'd stop at only 20/22/25 @
Elina @
suedehead ? Would you in theory want to look like a skinny, punky kid your entire life? If living forever is something I'd actually consider (which it's not), I would want to be at least 30 in appearance, if not 40 or 50. Definitely yields more respect and authority than some 20-year old know-nothing that nobody would listen to.
Especially for women. Once women get to at least 27/28, or early thirties especially, and they have that sexy thickness to them, of being a complete woman, then they can be most attractive imo. Many women in today's society are waiting until 30/early thirties to start having children. A girl who wants to stay looking like she's only 20 or 22 and being a skinny twig forever is missing out on her best looks!