Ashura Augusta

[tcaudilllg]

We know she's an ENTp, but what of her exertion type? It appears to be ISTj...

We live in a world of animate and inanimate objects.

The first are more complex than the latter.

In addition, in our view, the first form closed systems

that attempt to withstand the rest of the world and thus in a way duplicate its parameters.

In other words, their bodies and psyches can and do reflect the entire external environment in all its complexity.

What is living puts itself in opposition to external reality, while what is lifeless blends with it.

I'm not settled on this... there are, of course, 16 possibilities.

It seems important to understand the mind of the person who invented socionics as much as possible.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

I really wonder why and how a type with Fi as PolR would construct a theory about intertype relations explaining how different types interact with each other romantically

IEI

[godslave]

I really wonder why and how a type with Fi as PolR would construct a theory about intertype relations explaining how different types interact with each other romantically

IEI

Imho, ITR in the socionics context are a Ti thing not an Fi thing. It lacks the feeling component of Fi since those ITR are organized and categorized from a detached POV . ITR are no more no less than a systematization of relationships according to a given law which derived from the theory itself, so it's Ti.

[ouronis]

Alive really does type everything as IEI

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Imho, ITR in the socionics context are a Ti thing not an Fi thing. It lacks the feeling component of Fi since those ITR are organized and categorized from a detached POV . ITR are no more no less than a systematization of relationships according to a given law which derived from the theory itself, so it's Ti.

The structure of intertype relations is very Ti, very systematic, but the individual descriptions about how each type interacts with the other up to the point how it makes the other person feel, tha'st a very ethical perspective. The thought that a type like ILE, who has major problems perceiving how his words and actions make other people feel, would come up and invent a system with detailed explanations of how other people relate to one another...it just seems bizarre to me. It makes much more sense that it was a type with Ti as activating function and strong ethical functions

[on a peaceful hiatus]

Alive really does type everything as IEI

>IEI invents system to describe interpersonal dynamics
>people of the same type get interested in it and flock to sites like this
>meanwhile all the normie types don't give a shit about it due to weak Ni and the theory remains an obscure phenomenon

[Tallmo]

I really wonder why and how a type with Fi as PolR would construct a theory about intertype relations explaining how different types interact with each other romantically

That's exactly the reason: Fi polr. To substitute real feeling with a system that will make the need for Fi obsolete. This is something one can see in Alpha NTs. They can talk a lot about relationships, and they try to explain and theoretize about it. Real Feeling is a different matter though.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

That's exactly the reason: Fi polr. To substitute real feeling with a system that will make the need for Fi obsolete. This is something one can see in Alpha NTs. They can talk a lot about relationships, and they try to explain and theoretize about it. Real Feeling is a different matter though.

But socionics emphazises that everyone is unique. It's not a 2+2=4 system. It's not like you find a dual and live happily ever after. Why are intertype relations for me as a logical type so uninteresting and a type with even lower Fi would invent that concept? What do ethical types do? They constantly wonder "will I get along with this person, is he/she a good match for me" and so on. They have a way stronger motivation to figure out these interpersonal dynamics then a type with Fi as PolR. I ask a couple of my ILE friends and they understand this issue immediatly, but for an unfortunate reason people here see ILE as the inventor and that's it, despite Ne being more about alternatives

[ouronis]

>IEI invents system to describe interpersonal dynamics
>people of the same type get interested in it and flock to sites like this
>meanwhile all the normie types don't give a shit about it due to weak Ni and the theory remains an obscure phenomenon

As long as you're self-aware, I don't give a shit. Just thought it was funny.

[on a peaceful hiatus]

As long as you're self-aware, I don't give a shit. Just thought it was funny.

I'm just seeing this type as visionairy, that's why most famous people make up this type in my view.

[Rusal]

Well ethicals of distancing subtype could view the apparently symmetry of Socionics and the order it confers to the experience of existing as human sack of organs as a curiosity feature worth studying. Main focus: not relationships going forward. Then maybe logicals with Fi polr but with a contact subtype...

[ouronis]

I'm just seeing this type as visionairy, that's why most famous people make up this type in my view.

I usually see them as bitchy and stale

[on a peaceful hiatus]

I usually see them as bitchy and stale

I'm obviously not talking about every example of this type. Most people are average