Thats it! Now Gekslies are more vulnerable! Now Their life vill fall in horror!!!
Horror! TOP-10 Attacks on ENFp's 4-th function!
Thats it! Now Gekslies are more vulnerable! Now Their life vill fall in horror!!!
0:59 !!!
0:59 !!!Originally Posted by Anglas
0:59!!!!!
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Try to make interviews with random people on streets.
Come to pretty girls with camera. Ask "May I interest you opinion about <anything>". Then make socionics analysis of their answers. Also sometimes you may suggest type of people befor talking with them. Call it "field socionics".
Such your channel may become funny.
Bad idea. My standards for typing - in at least 1 hour conversation. In the same time: when most of the people are INTP's - are not interesting and doesn't have a scientific interest.Try to make interviews with random people on streets.
Come to pretty girls with camera. Ask "May I interest you opinion about <anything>". Then make socionics analysis of their answers. Also sometimes you may suggest type of people befor talking with them. Call it "field socionics".
Such your channel may become funny.
You may type a part of type, not the whole type. Such things may be understood sometimes in a couple of minutes, assumption about whole type may appear fast too. Especially by method of intuitive impressions from nonverbal behavior.
The other application of short dialogues - you notice factors to wich you give interpretations. It's not obligate these factors will lead you to sure opinion about type or part of it.
Even if you type most to INTP I'm sure significant % is left for other types. So it will be not hard to put on youtube examples of other types too, besides INTPs. A part of videos just will stay not uploaded.when most of the people are INTP's
I suspect you have everything to create such videos. This will get interest to your channel. You'll become the 1st in field socionics like Gagarin.
Intuitive impressions are usually full of mistakes. That's why I applied standard: at least one hour. As most of the people are INTP type - this activity would be inefficient
vlcsnap-2016-02-20-17h41m38s146.png
0:59
Here is it!!!
If you have some questions to me about the video - please PM to me
No that's wrong
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
my gawd. are the ENFPs under attack?
0
:
5
9!!!!!!!!
You should take course on mathematical analysis.
And realize that you are right on larger scale but there are mistakes.It is down to an individual to decide what is full of mistakes. If the word full implies full then there is no room for correct impressions? Am I right?
No room for intuitive impressions in analysis to justify anything. There are interesting non intuitive results. Makes me wonder Karl Weierstrass's type.
And somewhere in the universe IEE's head just exploded.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
LolYou should take course on mathematical analysis.
And realize that you are right on larger scale but there are mistakes.
No room for intuitive impressions in analysis to justify anything. There are interesting non intuitive results. Makes me wonder Karl Weierstrass's type.
And somewhere in the universe IEE's head just exploded.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
3:22 Fun song about mathematical analysisYou should take course on mathematical analysis.
And realize that you are right on larger scale but there are mistakes.
No room for intuitive impressions in analysis to justify anything. There are interesting non intuitive results. Makes me wonder Karl Weierstrass's type.
And somewhere in the universe IEE's head just exploded.
Hi anyone! I'm get back!
Stole a meme
@hag I apologize, I really really needed it. You can use mine if you want to.
Лечу я над морем. Гляжу: нефтесклад
А В нефтескладе Геки горят!
Пламя пылает и обжигает
Слава России! Геки! Страдайте!
Reply With Quote
