I mostly just go with their self-typing... I don't see the need to doubt it too much.
I mostly just go with their self-typing... I don't see the need to doubt it too much.
@Satan, what made you go from SEI to EII for me?
P.S: Still curious to know what some people see as Si valuing in me. No one has given me any explanation for that yet.
Si base is the wildcard here when people don't know what to type someone...?Originally Posted by Cassandra
@Satan, what made you go from SEI to EII for me?
P.S: Still curious to know what some people see as Si valuing in me. No one has given me any explanation for that yet.
Looks like it, I suppose?
My guess is he sees me as EII because I am supposedly Maritsa's Identical.
i decided that you're not creative fe. you're just too flat and don't have the range for creative fe.@Satan, what made you go from SEI to EII for me?
P.S: Still curious to know what some people see as Si valuing in me. No one has given me any explanation for that yet.
you still seem like an ethical type, and your temperment just doesn't seem ip. you're not sharp enough for isfj, which leaves infj.
Which creative Fe people on this forum are not "too flat" to be creative Fe in your view?
say, aylen, epheme, starfall, ghost of people who come to mind who have voice chatted on discord.
speaking of which, i haven't heard your voice yet @Myst
Lol you and your reminders
Actually I agree btw, @Ghost seems Fe creative. But, closest to IEI. SEI is really this wildcard type lol
Fe base types have a wider range of emotions than Fe creative. Ni leading would mean that they are introverted
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@silke what is your sociotype, if you don't mind me asking?
I get typed as IEI & LSI most often, and sometimes ILI, EII, and LII. I'm too hands-off for an LSI and not unicorn enough for an IEI lol
hm, another mod / long time member that is unsure of their type? that's really curious. (not judging though, and thanks for replying so quickly too.)
i haven't paid a massive amount of attention to you, but my initial impression has been LII or ESI for you... however, the other types you listed seem plausible too i guess. this response in particular pings as IEIish to me with the way you worded it though lol. i know many IEIs who don't really identify with the unicorn image lol, so it's a decent possibility. anyway i don't want to bother you about it more, but you're welcome to reach out to chat with me about it if you'd like anytime.
I don't think silke is in doubt of her type. She's just not advertising it. For a long time I thought she was SEI, because she "feels" cool and distant to me, but I've since reconsidered, because my impression could be due to other factors.
silke is certainly an introvert, certainly has red hair, certainly is in good physical shape, almost certainly (>95%) is logical, has the capacity for hard work, sometimes gets her panties in a twist but is usually cool, calm, and collected, and has done a lot of very valuable article translations. Her article translations were the first valuable things I saw on this site. I now think she is probably SLI or, much less likely but possibly, ILI. But probably SLI. I don't see LSI at all, nor IEI, nor EII.
Believe it or not, I also think she values Te over Ti, so LII is out.
I also think she's OK, although that might not be obvious from my statements in this post.
Last edited by Adam Strange; 03-25-2017 at 05:43 AM.
@Adam Strange I could see that for her. I wanted to ask her because of her interpretation of Singularity's lyrics up there on this page, where she said she didn't consider it to be beta but instead So instinct, where it resonated very strongly as beta and relatable for me; I got the sense that not being able to relate, she might not be a beta herself. Hence my initial impressions too. The high Ti of LII and high Si demo of ESI and Ipish temperament of an IEI put together would make an SLI I guess.
Well, I cheated and just VI'd her. Lol. You did it the honest way.
(I think she's quite attractive, too, but then there's that red hair fixation of mine....)
ESI for Bertrand. Fi-Te valuing for Myst, leaning LSE.
Hey, feel free to PM me with any opinions about my type
ESI is godlike I only hope that's true
back when I had facial hair I threw up a pic on MBTI reddit and someone said I looked like ISFP
Recent.jpg
I feel like my friend could be LSI or LSE
One of those is LSE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Just because you find one of them cute? ;p
I'm betting the one on the left is SLI and the one on the right is ESI.
Well, that's how people are generally typed.
Your patterns for typing are clearly just apophenia.
I greyed the ones whose type I'm not an authority on. But I only included those whose types I have a clear view of and who I have interacted with.
Absurd- XSTx
Adam Strange - Te-ego
Agarina - IXXj (ESI first choice, LSI second)
Ananke - SLE (but a nice one)
Andreas - EII-Ne
applejacks - IEE-Fi
April - ESI-Fi
Aquagraph - SLI-7
bionicgoat - EII-Ne
Brilliand - LII-Ne
BulletsAndDoves- IEI
Capitalist Pig - ILI-Te
Chae - ENFx
Chryssie - SEI
crazedrat - IEI-Ni
darya - EIE
Director Abbie - LSE
dolphin - SEE
FDG - LIE
hag - EII-Ne
HaveLucidDreamz LII
Hitta - Epsilon
hkkmr - ILE-Ti
InvisibleJim - ILI-Te
jaein - EII-Ne
Kamajama - SEI
lungs - ESI
malna - EII-Fi
Maritsa33 - EII-Fi
Minde - EII-Fi
Myst - LSI
nanashi - ILI
Narc - LIE-Te
NewBorn STAR - IEI
ouronis - LII
polikujm - EII-Ne-Ne
Reficulris - ENXp-Ne
Reuben - ILE-Ne
sev - SEI
Snaps - ESE
Spider - ILI
squark - LSI
Starfall - IEI-Ni
SubT - INXj
Theoria - ILI-Ni (second choice: IEI)
Transkar - EXXp-Se
Uncle Rob - SLI
Uniden - EII
woofwoofl - SEE
WorkaholicsAnon - ESE-Si
Regarding the typing suggested for me: I find it amusing that some people think I'm an introvert. But online tests keep thinking I'm an introvert too (especially MBTI, but that doesn't count).
Nrmalizing subtype? Would that make me LSE-N?
Everything's apophenia when Ni's your PoLR.Your patterns for typing are clearly just apophenia.
Last edited by Slade; 03-29-2017 at 08:56 PM.
Hey, feel free to PM me with any opinions about my type
Maritsa I am not an ESE and I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion.
Everything interests me but nothing holds me.
adding new people
@Bertrand IEI
@Victor SLE-Ti
@thehotelambush LII-Ti
@Cassandra IEI 9w1
changes
@Chae IEE
ex@verbrante IEI-Fe 4w3
^
my typings
Cassandra: so/sx 4w3 7w6 9w1
Verbrannte aka Wyrd: soc first 5. undecided about wing but 5 fo sho.
Because of your wide range of emotionality and how you can communicate situations to people to cause them to feel emotions . Since we are friends on Facebook I can see how that happens clearly
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa everyone causes others to feel emotions. You certainly make many members here feel emotions. You must be an ESE as well I suppose.
Everything interests me but nothing holds me.
You use Fe very effectively and consistently. You energize people with emotions. In the way that you articulate events and happenings you can create excitement, you can create sadness, you can create love and happiness and you can also create feelings or understandings of feelings of rage. You are very effective in the area of usage of emotions. You can say things in a way that causes an emotional response from others. It is your base function. You express the life events that you experience in high and energetic tone that causes others to feel the emotions that they should feel in the particular situations. When you say rage you don't just say it "I feel like raging" you say it with that tone that vibrates the seas of emotions.
You have good taste, you said you have good taste you are a sensory type and very sensory oriented. This puts you in ESE and that's final.
People of this sociotype, as the leading function suggests, are quite emotionally oriented. Her emotionality manifests itself vividly in the ability to appear glad at any life event. Everywhere she tries to create a holiday atmosphere. With the aid of others this is easily accomplished, without bragging, by charging those that surround her by her enthusiasm, energy and high tone.
I noticed this about you "HUGO women have special energy about them - they are energetic, assertive, directed, merry, and flirtatious. They speak loudly and energetically. Resourceful in flirtation, won't search long for the right word, mocking, and readily breaks into laughter. HUGO knows her worth and can stand up for herself.
As a rule, women of this type always look neat and tidy. They take care of their looks with purpose and skill, allocating to this a lot of time and attention. They often have great looking hair-cuts. If their hair is long then it is skillfully assembled into an accurate ponytail or beautifully falls onto their shoulders. No absurd cuts, no unkempt hair, or greasy bangs on their forehead, no mistakes with coloration."
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-07-2017 at 04:45 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That is very complimentary! That is very nice of you to think that of me!
Everything interests me but nothing holds me.
You're welcome. I think that you and my sister are twins lol
Here's the ESE VI link for reference
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ortraits-Alpha
Also, EII repress emotions.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Starfall
You too...you speak in a mocking tone which is very characteristic of ESE.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not emotionally expressive. Good luck with your VI skills. Again, nice mocking
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I hope to see you in person some day then maybe you'll get the right picture.But she looks just like youexact same smile.
Also, whenever I've seen you on cam you've been super emotionally expressive, always putting that Fe to good use.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hmm I've brought my investigative skills to the task and actually I think I can note some similarities.
Last edited by uniden; 04-07-2017 at 06:23 AM.
@uniden that's very ILE of you
Back to the typings I wanted to post, I recently have two Te bases on my radar, I need to get into that more though. Let me hear what you think.
@mclane is LSE
@Singularity is LIE (???) Really doesn't go together with e-type though
I've been saying this shit since day one y'all, ESEHmm I've brought my investigative skills to the task and actually I think I can note some similarities.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Yup, I look and act just like Taylor Swift, genius
Go ahead analyze that. You're so good at it
And, you don't need actual proof because you're so smart
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...36-DC-RICHMOND
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm pretty sure this is some combination of instinct stackings (Sp-first and/or So-last tend to be more socially introverted, although this has to be combined with information processing as well) and -Pi (-Px in general does the same thing, but -Pi a little bit more). MBTI is social introversion, and otherwise you have popsci magazine things like "extraverts don't like 'negativity' and just want to have fun times!" that have nothing to do with socionics (even Gulenko pointed out a lot of stereotypical introvert traits are Negativist > Introtim, and although he has a lot of bonkers armchair theorizing, I think the actual type examples should be enough to show that this is correct). There's a whole thread here on "ambiverts" and "introvert extratims" and "extravert introtims".
Posting Permissions
