Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 81 to 120 of 143

Thread: Inconsiderably Finite Indefinite Socionics Test

  1. #81

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSI

    58% ILE, 49% LII, 40% ESE, 49% SEI, 90% SLE, 92% LSI, 42% EIE, 50% IEI, 40% SEE, 53% ESI, 49% LIE, 57% ILI, 16% IEE, 18% EII, 47% LSE and 47% SLI!

  2. #82
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    /
    Posts
    7,044
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Observer (ILI)

    55% ILE, 55% LII, 28% ESE, 47% SEI, 47% SLE, 56% LSI, 31% EIE, 60% IEI, 34% SEE, 44% ESI, 51% LIE, 83% ILI, 42% IEE, 50% EII, 49% LSE and 69% SLI!

  3. #83
    The sleeping beauty Velvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Romantic (IEI)

    47% ILE, 47% LII, 53% ESE, 60% SEI, 47% SLE, 56% LSI, 66% EIE, 73% IEI, 54% SEE, 57% ESI, 38% LIE, 42% ILI, 46% IEE, 40% EII, 34% LSE and 38% SLI!

  4. #84
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,402
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amber View Post
    EIE

    24% ILE, 47% LII, 59% ESE, 47% SEI, 38% SLE, 63% LSI, 81% EIE, 67% IEI, 51% SEE, 70% ESI, 60% LIE, 34% ILI, 38% IEE, 54% EII, 38% LSE and 15% SLI!



    This is my test result now. In June 2014 I was leading a nation to power. Well it's still fair enough that it was the 2nd highest type.





    Your result for The Splendid Socionics Test 3.0 ...
    The Guardian (ESI)

    15% ILE, 47% LII, 44% ESE, 44% SEI, 28% SLE, 63% LSI, 68% EIE, 58% IEI, 58% SEE, 83% ESI, 60% LIE, 49% ILI, 44% IEE, 67% EII, 44% LSE and 36% SLI!


    The primary focus in life for ESIs is on stable inner criteria for personal relationships, therefore they follow ethical principles through which they evaluate their own and others' behavior and ideas, backed by input from what they perceive as the real world and how people really are rather than idealism, imagination or not-demonstrated potential in people.

    The ESI sees reality primarily through static personal ethics and stable interpersonal bonds between individuals, including himself, where the status of such interpersonal bonds is determined by his personal ethics. The ESI is very confident in evaluating the ethical or moral qualities, and their consistency, of other people as well of himself.

    ESIs interact most favorably with LIEs
    (For a more complete description, go to: http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=ESI



    YOUR ANALYSIS (Vertical line = Average)



    • You scored 15% on ILE, higher than 1% of your peers.

    • You scored 47% on LII, higher than 22% of your peers.

    • You scored 44% on ESE, higher than 51% of your peers.

    • You scored 44% on SEI, higher than 26% of your peers.

    • You scored 28% on SLE, higher than 14% of your peers.

    • You scored 63% on LSI, higher than 88% of your peers.

    • You scored 68% on EIE, higher than 89% of your peers.

    • You scored 58% on IEI, higher than 58% of your peers.

    • You scored 58% on SEE, higher than 90% of your peers.

    • You scored 83% on ESI, higher than 99% of your peers.

    • You scored 60% on LIE, higher than 83% of your peers.

    • You scored 49% on ILI, higher than 34% of your peers.

    • You scored 44% on IEE, higher than 36% of your peers.

    • You scored 67% on EII, higher than 80% of your peers.

    • You scored 44% on LSE, higher than 48% of your peers.

    • You scored 36% on SLI, higher than 12% of your peers.


  5. #85
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Analyst (LII)
    42% ILE, 66% LII, 38% ESE, 50% SEI, 35% SLE, 58% LSI, 34% EIE, 57% IEI, 35% SEE, 56% ESI, 42% LIE, 62% ILI, 43% IEE, 61% EII, 46% LSE and 55% SLI!
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  6. #86
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,359
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Psychologist (IEE)
    92% IEE
    73% EII

    65% SLI
    64% SEE
    63% ILE
    57% SEI
    51% ILI

    48% LSE
    47% LII
    44% IEI
    43% ESE
    40% LIE
    35% SLE
    35% EIE
    34% ESI

    8% LSI
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  7. #87
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    2,999
    Mentioned
    130 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amber View Post
    This is my test result now. In June 2014 I was leading a nation to power.
    wat?

  8. #88
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,402
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ouronis View Post
    wat?


  9. #89
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    2,999
    Mentioned
    130 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amber View Post
    No stares, you gotta fess up. I see Berlin and I see rulership.

  10. #90
    Reficulris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,028
    Mentioned
    189 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not bad, seems most people get their self-typing. And I didn't try this time to influence it

    The Psychologist (IEE)

    70% ILE, 56% LII, 41% ESE, 51% SEI, 42% SLE, 17% LSI, 31% EIE, 44% IEI, 55% SEE, 30% ESI, 46% LIE, 59% ILI, 83% IEE, 69% EII, 56% LSE and 58% SLI!



    YOUR ANALYSIS (Vertical line = Average)



    • You scored 70% on ILE, higher than 95% of your peers.

    • You scored 56% on LII, higher than 56% of your peers.

    • You scored 41% on ESE, higher than 45% of your peers.

    • You scored 51% on SEI, higher than 52% of your peers.

    • You scored 42% on SLE, higher than 45% of your peers.

    • You scored 17% on LSI, higher than 1% of your peers.

    • You scored 31% on EIE, higher than 8% of your peers.

    • You scored 44% on IEI, higher than 22% of your peers.

    • You scored 55% on SEE, higher than 83% of your peers.

    • You scored 30% on ESI, higher than 4% of your peers.

    • You scored 46% on LIE, higher than 39% of your peers.

    • You scored 59% on ILI, higher than 62% of your peers.

    • You scored 83% on IEE, higher than 99% of your peers.

    • You scored 69% on EII, higher than 85% of your peers.

    • You scored 56% on LSE, higher than 83% of your peers.

    • You scored 58% on SLI, higher than 73% of your peers.


    Last edited by Reficulris; 04-20-2015 at 05:29 PM.

  11. #91
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,359
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    Not bad, seems most people get their self-typing. And I didn't try this time to influence it
    Why would you try to influence the result?
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  12. #92
    Reficulris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,028
    Mentioned
    189 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anndelise View Post
    Why would you try to influence the result?

    With a lot of tests i've got to like "lie" about extroversion/introversion.


    questions like "do you need to get away from people after prolonged contact" for instance don't describe any of the introverted im's but are still commonplace in tests.

    If I don't influence most tests i'll get IEI anytime, and i'm pretty sure most people by now agree that Ne base is much more likely than Ni base for me.

  13. #93
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,359
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    With a lot of tests i've got to like "lie" about extroversion/introversion.


    questions like "do you need to get away from people after prolonged contact" for instance don't describe any of the introverted im's but are still commonplace in tests.

    If I don't influence most tests i'll get IEI anytime, and i'm pretty sure most people by now agree that Ne base is much more likely than Ni base for me.
    When I take a personality typing test, i tend to approach each with curiosity and a 'clean slate'. I'm curious what the test maker is testing for, what the answers will result in according to the test maker, etc. One of the best ways for me to do this is to just answer as honestly as I can, and as if I've never heard of socionics. Often the questions will show oddities, especially ones with multiple things being described in one answer. Like this test. There were a few questions that had more than two descriptions in an answer, a portion might fit but the rest doesn't. So then I have to figure out which fits more or stronger. Also, errors like you mentioned, conflating object/field as social energy interactions. Imo, this is a reflection of the strength and/or trustworthiness of the test, and the test maker's understanding.

    I know that people use such tests to try to test their own understanding, figuring out what each answer corresponds to, etc. And some to try to 'prove' their self-typing. Thanks for adding 'trying to correct for the errors' you perceive.
    Last edited by anndelise; 04-20-2015 at 09:39 PM. Reason: Fixed , into '
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  14. #94
    Reficulris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,028
    Mentioned
    189 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anndelise View Post
    When I take a personality typing test, i tend to approach each with curiosity and a 'clean slate'. I'm curious what the test maker is testing for, what the answers will result in according to the test maker, etc. One of the best ways for me to do this is to just answer as honestly as I can, and as if I've never heard of socionics. Often the questions will show oddities, especially ones with multiple things being described in one answer. Like this test. There were a few questions that had more than two descriptions in an answer, a portion might fit but the rest doesn't. So then I have to figure out which fits more or stronger. Also, errors like you mentioned, conflating object/field as social energy interactions. Imo, this is a reflection of the strength and/or trustworthiness of the test, and the test maker's understanding.

    I know that people use such tests to try to test their own understanding, figuring out what each answer corresponds to, etc. And some to try to 'prove' their self-typing. Thanks for adding 'trying to correct for the errors, you perceive.

    Yeah, i have the same approach initially. I'll do a test without influencing it. But usually i'll get IEI and then I'll "correct" for this particular dimention.

    I'm not sure, i mean for all i know i'm IEI, but some ways people ask for introversion/extroversion are clearly flawed..

    Social introversion/extroversion does not equal introverted base extroverted base.

  15. #95
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,359
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    Social introversion/extroversion does not equal introverted base extroverted base.
    Yeah, that's a not a good sign in a socionics test.
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  16. #96
    an object in motion woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    2,111
    Mentioned
    329 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default ST > gamma > ENTx > jud F > assorted N

    The Artisan (SLI)



    76% SLI
    74% SLE
    74% LSE
    65% LSI
    61% ILI
    59% SEE
    58% ESI
    51% LIE
    47% ILE
    42% ESE
    40% IEE
    32% SEI
    31% EII
    30% LII
    27% EIE
    26% IEI
    p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
    trad metalz | (more coming)

  17. #97
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    (It would be good if this test was added to the "Socionics Tests" stickied thread, or some forum article post which collates all the various tests, so people can more easily find it if they wish!)

    @mu4, @silke, @bg

  18. #98
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,927
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    16 Thread(s)

    Default

    this test sucks, it way underestimates my infjness.

    http://www.helloquizzy.com/results/t...37&var_IEI=-16

  19. #99
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Seeker (ILE)

    http://www.helloquizzy.com/results/t...=25&var_IEI=-3

    82% ILE
    69% LII
    66% ILI
    59% IEE
    58% SLI
    57% EII
    54% SLE
    53% LSE
    50% LIE
    47% SEI
    47% IEI
    40% SEE
    38% LSI
    34% ESE
    31% EIE
    26% ESI

  20. #100
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    "utilises Gulenko + Meged & Ovcharov subtype descriptions"

    You may skip this test as another pseudo-socionics bullshit.

  21. #101

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    TIM
    ESI 684
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    "utilises Gulenko + Meged & Ovcharov subtype descriptions"

    You may skip this test as another pseudo-socionics bullshit.
    What? Why?

  22. #102
    Anglas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Lithuania
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 7w8 So/Sp
    Posts
    1,546
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Enterpriser (LIE)
    35% ILE, 56% LII, 33% ESE, 28% SEI, 30% SLE, 51% LSI, 56% EIE, 40% IEI, 42% SEE, 54% ESI, 80% LIE, 67% ILI, 47% IEE, 59% EII, 57% LSE and 56% SLI!

  23. #103

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Redid it, similar results

    52% ILE, 55% LII, 43% ESE, 49% SEI, 78% SLE, 92% LSI, 44% EIE, 56% IEI, 42% SEE, 59% ESI, 43% LIE, 54% ILI, 17% IEE, 31% EII, 42% LSE and 56% SLI!

    Lol:
    You scored 78% on SLE, higher than 97% of your peers.
    You scored 92% on LSI, higher than 100% of your peers.

  24. #104

    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Observer (ILI)

    38% ILE, 48% LII, 10% ESE, 29% SEI, 44% SLE, 58% LSI, 53% EIE, 69% IEI, 56% SEE, 69% ESI, 75% LIE, 85% ILI, 49% IEE, 49% EII, 32% LSE and 45% SLI!

    There were quite a few questions that I answered "unsure". At the moment the most possible types for me seem to be ILI/EII/ESI though

  25. #105
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    2,999
    Mentioned
    130 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Got ILI. Figured I would

  26. #106

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    4,697
    Mentioned
    510 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ouronis View Post
    Got ILI. Figured I would
    How was LII score?

  27. #107
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    2,999
    Mentioned
    130 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
    How was LII score?
    I had a bunch of scores nearly even with each other in the 50's, LII was there. Next highest to ILI was IEE. IP temperament behavior and being able to doubt myself tends to make my LII score in tests come down.

  28. #108
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ouronis View Post
    I had a bunch of scores nearly even with each other in the 50's, LII was there. Next highest to ILI was IEE. IP temperament behavior and being able to doubt myself tends to make my LII score in tests come down.
    Harmonizing sub strengthens IP-ish-ness.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  29. #109
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    "utilises Gulenko + Meged & Ovcharov subtype descriptions"

    You may skip this test as another pseudo-socionics bullshit.
    Those subtype descriptions were used in order to get the strongest flavour of a type in relation to the other three options, e.g. the first question was between LSI (Ti-subtype), SEE (Se-subtype), EII (Fi-subtype), and ILE (Ne-subtype). Whether or not I or anybody else agrees with subtypes, those descriptions were a good resource to pilfer in my view to give four distinctive options to choose from (five if you consider "I relate to none of the above statements, or cannot decide between them." a distinctive option, which I do.

  30. #110
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    2,999
    Mentioned
    130 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    The fact that you included "cannot decide" as an option makes this test heads over others.

  31. #111

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    TIM
    ESI 684
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ouronis View Post
    The fact that you included "cannot decide" as an option makes this test heads over others.

    Indeed it does.

    Anyhow, got ESI with some 85% strength. Let's see more.

  32. #112
    huiheiwufhawriuhg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    North Africa
    Posts
    1,301
    Mentioned
    163 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Seems the test thinks I am an IEI

    47% ILE, 62% LII, 31% ESE, 60% SEI, 47% SLE, 62% LSI, 51% EIE, 81% IEI, 40% SEE, 51% ESI, 47% LIE, 65% ILI, 40% IEE, 57% EII, 26% LSE and 44% SLI!


  33. #113
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subteigh View Post
    46% ILE, 64% LII, 44% ESE, 45% SEI, 17% SLE, 28% LSI, 44% EIE, 48% IEI, 41% SEE, 52% ESI, 42% LIE, 48% ILI, 74% IEE, 83% EII, 44% LSE and 48% SLI!


    ...oh, fairly pleased with that, I was worried that my early answers were going to give me Alpha NT...specifically LII of course. I guess try to answer best you can...which includes answering "I can't decide" etc. if relevant!
    Why would you be worried?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  34. #114
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm EII
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  35. #115
    Roro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    TIM
    6 sp
    Posts
    999
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Observer (ILI)

    30% ILE, 64% LII, 32% ESE, 51% SEI, 24% SLE, 58% LSI, 30% EIE, 58% IEI, 40% SEE, 68% ESI, 44% LIE, 72% ILI, 47% IEE, 72% EII, 47% LSE and 66% SLI!


    Too close. SLE and ExE being the lowest scoring seems good though.

  36. #116
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Why would you be worried?
    Because it might suggest (other explanations are possible) that the test was not sufficient for test-takers to having their personality accurately recorded in Socionics form. There are numerous ways of dividing up the types into fours or twos not utilised in the test, and there is certainly a possibility that not having a sufficient number of variations and/or well-defined question statements could introduce a bias into the test (it was partly for this reason I was uncertain of the extent to which revisions of previous tests I made should be shortened (these revisions generally appeared in subsequent tests, with the except of when I was tinkering with whether or not to have one or two temperament questions).

    Also, the manner of scoring is of some importance: I have not been consistent in the scoring between one block of questions or another (whether based on four statements or two, or whether based directly on some aspect of Model-A or not). The four (or five if you include the neutral answer) statement questions are generally scored in such a way that if you say choose option A, it might give you +8 for LSE, +8 for LIE, +4 for SLI, +4 for ILI, -8 for IEI...etc. ...but the two statement questions don't have that. There are also if I recall some questions that have scoring in terms of +8, +4, +2, -2, -4, -8 (I think ones involving Hidden Agenda descriptions). I think there were other instances where I felt the descriptions were not adequate to suggest a partial propensity or an avid opposition also. There are also questions where the range of scorings for each type in one block of questions is different for the range for other questions (probably not by more than about 20%: I think some questions had a range of 20 (the temperament ones?), and others a range of 16). Having questions on something like temperaments is also potentially something of an issue, as it may be of questionable significance, and/or it may dilute the individual's result away from what is more crucial about Model-A, which could point individuals in the wrong direction.

  37. #117
    LϺαο Not A Communist Shill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Beijing
    TIM
    TMI
    Posts
    19,136
    Mentioned
    506 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ideally, I would greatly like to optimise the test further by removing redundant or inferior questions and putting in new ones. Having long and short variants would also be nice, as well as having it scored in an optimal way, and properly programmed somewhere else (not something I can do).

    if someone or a group of people (I am thinking of @Jack Oliver Aaron and WSS especially) would like to create some uber-test, I can get them some info on the scoring (perhaps let them having my helloquizzy account details) and maybe any further insights I might have...take the whole thing if you like, it is just parts of descriptions painstakingly copied-and-pasted from elsewhere over many hours after all .

  38. #118
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    The Romantic (IEI)

    39% ILE, 45% LII, 36% ESE, 60% SEI, 36% SLE, 43% LSI, 61% EIE, 85% IEI, 50% SEE, 56% ESI, 37% LIE, 58% ILI, 50% IEE, 59% EII, 17% LSE and 38% SLI!c

    On the revised quiz I made a choice on a couple of questions I could not decide on the first time.
     

    The Romantic (IEI)

    53% ILE, 53% LII, 41% ESE, 57% SEI, 53% SLE, 49% LSI, 76% EIE, 93% IEI,
    53% SEE, 50% ESI, 43% LIE, 62% ILI, 54% IEE, 50% EII, 13% LSE and 24% SLI!



    IEIs perceive, process, and produce information concerning trends and patterns over time most intensively. They constantly and inadvertently make judgments, assessments, and assumptions about relationships based on what they see as recurring trends from past behavior.

    They tend to understand the underlying dynamics of situations, people, etc., but may not be able to readily verbalize these insights since they are so internal and conceptual. IEIs are very imaginative people who tend to be mystical and dreamy. Their gentle demeanor does not cast them as particularly rebellious, but their obscure desires are often a far cry from those of the typical person.

    IEIs interact most favorably with SLEs
    (For a more complete description, go to: http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=IEI










    15 months later:

    The Romantic (IEI)

    28% ILE, 43% LII, 34% ESE, 68% SEI, 28% SLE, 51% LSI, 61% EIE, 87% IEI, 57% SEE, 74% ESI, 40% LIE, 66% ILI, 49% IEE, 56% EII, 13% LSE and 47% SLI!


    YOUR ANALYSIS (Vertical line = Average)

    ILE Distribution
    You scored 28% on ILE, higher than 7% of your peers.

    LII Distribution
    You scored 43% on LII, higher than 13% of your peers.

    ESE Distribution
    You scored 34% on ESE, higher than 25% of your peers.

    SEI Distribution
    You scored 68% on SEI, higher than 93% of your peers.

    SLE Distribution
    You scored 28% on SLE, higher than 16% of your peers.

    LSI Distribution
    You scored 51% on LSI, higher than 53% of your peers.

    EIE Distribution
    You scored 61% on EIE, higher than 86% of your peers.

    IEI Distribution
    You scored 87% on IEI, higher than 98% of your peers.

    SEE Distribution
    You scored 57% on SEE, higher than 88% of your peers.

    ESI Distribution
    You scored 74% on ESI, higher than 96% of your peers.

    LIE Distribution
    You scored 40% on LIE, higher than 19% of your peers.

    ILI Distribution
    You scored 66% on ILI, higher than 76% of your peers.

    IEE Distribution
    You scored 49% on IEE, higher than 57% of your peers.

    EII Distribution
    You scored 56% on EII, higher than 50% of your peers.

    LSE Distribution
    You scored 13% on LSE, higher than 2% of your peers.

    SLI Distribution
    You scored 47% on SLI, higher than 31% of your peers.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  39. #119
    High Priestess glam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,371
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Mediator (SEI)
    35% ILE, 49% LII, 59% ESE, 76% SEI,
    35% SLE, 52% LSI, 60% EIE, 75% IEI,
    49% SEE, 62% ESI, 26% LIE, 47% ILI,
    48% IEE, 56% EII, 25% LSE and 48% SLI!


    top four results: SEI (76%), IEI (75%), ESI (62%), EIE (60%)

  40. #120

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    TIM
    ESI 684
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    But the problem of majority of tests isn't within them. Unless you can make them fully interactive with explanations, examples and stuff-the thing is that in order for a test to have any value, it must be reviewed by a living person who spent some time with his / her client(even if that is as miniscule as 30 minutes).

    The main problem is the HUGE HORRIBLE self bias we all have. Even with a perfectly explained and conducted test, one can fall prey to a bout of self bias. Or like a link aylen put said: "I remembered that I saved 3$ before few days by optimising what I really want. So I clicked super logical and efficient. The very fact that I splurged like all hell 15 other times this month...meh who cares about that, right?" THAT is your enemy. GL fighting it. You'll need it if you're to develop a proper test.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •