Ew. LOL
Well, I signed up with two accounts out of curiosity. One was with a skinny cute pic of me, the other with a fat ugly pic of me. I got 63 matches within like half an hour with the fat ugly pic, but only 29 matches in half an hour with the skinny cute pic. (And actually I had to add a couple not as cute but still skinny photos to get ANY results right away on the skinny account.) I did come up as a fabulous match for myself both ways though!
There didn't seem to be much of a pattern, VI or otherwise, except that on both accounts almost all of the results were white and Asian (including one adorable Asian toddler <_<). Some of the same matches came up on both accounts. The skinny pic got more female matches.
Hey now.. a root ball is still part of the family tree.
ROFL this is BS...Heidy Klum and Seal just divorced
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't think they state that people will have long lasting relationships. That seems like more of a commitment, differing values, or life style (i.e. busy being a celebrity) problems. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the creator of the site intends that people find that initial spark of chemistry and let the rest develop or not develop based on other factors.