...
Twiggy or Lesley Lawson (Hornby)
...
Last edited by Hays; 04-25-2016 at 07:12 AM.
I don't think so. She seems delta.
I thought her name was Eddie Sedgwick.
I thought her name was Lesly Hornby?
Ni-IEI and sp/so seem right to me. I had figured 4w3, although I haven't looked into her that much.
she's intuitive, but not INFP. most probable types look like: ENTP, ENFJ
Ahh you agian go away to an MBTI forum, your typings are usually so off it's not even funny and it's misleading to new people.Originally Posted by Sol
She looks closer to ISFp
She is not an N type.
Fe...If I hate something, it's been bound to shoe eventually; gets bored with monotony sounds Ne DS.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Dude, if your abilities in typing will be better you'll change you opinionUntil this it's better for you to shut up and do not take my and other people attention to your incompetence.
Anyway, until someone will have objective proof that someone's typings are incorrect - any saying like "your typings are usually so off" is nothing more than shaking an air. If you'd been clever enough to understand it, you'd not write such bullshit and didn't discredit yourself in peoples' opinions about your brains and what they produce. In this situation, instead of shitting breaks about existing of opinions not matching yours, it's better for you to better study the subject and think a little more. The discussion is finished.
Last edited by Sol; 12-29-2012 at 08:12 PM.
I agree with you Diamond and what do you think Twiggy's type is?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She's right and I support her position as well as find your response to her uncalled for.Dude, if your abilities in typing will be better you'll change you opinion
Anyway, until someone will have objective proof that someone's typings are incorrect - any saying like "your typings are usually so off" is nothing more than shaking an air. If you'd been clever enough to understand it, you'd not write such bullshit and didn't discredit yourself in peoples' opinions about your brains and what they produce. In this situation, instead of shitting breaks about existing of opinions not matching yours, it's better for you to better study the subject and think a little more. The discussion is finished.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
