Hi everyone, new IEI FE subtype
Greetings!
Hi everyone, new IEI FE subtype
Last edited by Paradoxica; 08-16-2021 at 11:09 PM.
I think you mean IEI or INFp-Fe subtype. That's the typical way we call the types in socionics.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
omg yes gonna change that I'm so use to MBTI typology
I think I have seen you before in the MBTI ESTP Facebook group.
Just letting you know, Socionics is a different typology than MBTI. Most of these self-identified “INFJ” are either Fi base or EIE (i.e. EIE-Ni tend to self-type as “INFJ”). Some are IEI but many of them are not. In fact, a lot of self-identified INFP are IEI because (1) MBTI typed by letter before functions and (2) Te PoLR are often associated with low conscientiousness in the Big Five. Socionics got it right by allocating Ni/Si lead with a P type and Fi/Ti lead with a J type.
@Beautiful sky (Maritsa) is a self-identified MBTI INFJ and she’s EII in Socionics. Maritsa is a humanist who is concerned about ethics of relations. Meanwhile, @Braingel (Kara) is a self-identified MBTI INFP and she’s IEI in Socionics. Kara is a mystical dreamer and very spiritual.
Hi welcome
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You come across like an EIE-Ni type.
Thanks for your input, I will admit I know a lot more about other typologies (Enneagram, tritype, big five, MBTI, 4 temperament, motiv etc) that I know about socionics, I know my basics and that's pretty much it, In MBTI I tend to score INFJ most of the time and in socionics Yesenin (IEI) or Hamlet (EIE) but never EII or INFP in mbti and I know for sure that I am not FI dominant.
You are IEI definitelyOriginally Posted by Paradoxica
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
