-
Could the Function Ordering be Different from Model A?
Consider an LII as an example. Could it be possible that LII function ordering is better captured by the following?
1. Leading: Ti.
2. Creative: Ne.
3. Role: Se.
4. Vulnerable: Fi.
5. Suggestive: Fe.
6. Mobilizing: Si.
7. Ignoring: Te.
8. Demonstrative: Ni.
The reason that this might make more intuitive sense is that there is more symmetry in this model. For instance, in the LII above, the strongest function contrasts the weakest function (which is judging), seeks another judging function and is contrary to another judging function. Perhaps Ausra Augusta missed something when creating Model A... What do you think?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules