The case for me as anything other than ENFp

[Azeroffs]

Why do you think IEE? seriously..

you don't relate to EP. You say you are constructivist. I'm petty sure you'll agree on yielding. You don't relate to Fe-demonstrative. I've seen you suggest that you are Fe-ignoring. You don't relate to Ti-PoLR. I'm pretty sure you're Se-PoLR. I don't think you relate to Ne-base.

[Galen]

Why do you think IEE? seriously..

Upon examination of other people who are of Ij temperament, I find myself much less staunch than them. I'm not all that spastic as people would often associate with Ep temperament, but my internal energy levels match much much better than either rational temperament. I find myself getting distracted very easily, as if I'm hard-wired to be receptive for constant input of information. I also find myself habitually falling into doing what I want to do as opposed to doing what I'm supposed to do, something I've sorta come to associate with irrational vs rational temperaments.

As for the Reinin dichotomies, I'm much less sure as I was before. The veracity of them seems to be waning on me, as some of the descriptions on wikisocion (since there are no other good places to research them) seem contradictory (ENFps prefering both larger and smaller groups, etc). Besides, negativism completely fits with me, as does result to some extent.

Also I don't think the internet is a very conducive place for typing people. It's a much easier process with in-person interaction, as people are prone to putting on airs while on the internet, myself included.

[Morcheeba]

Upon examination of other people who are of Ij temperament, I find myself much less staunch than them. I'm not all that spastic as people would often associate with Ep temperament, but my internal energy levels match much much better than either rational temperament. I find myself getting distracted very easily, as if I'm hard-wired to be receptive for constant input of information. I also find myself habitually falling into doing what I want to do as opposed to doing what I'm supposed to do, something I've sorta come to associate with irrational vs rational temperaments.

Not true, I know plenty of rationals that do what they want as opposed to what they are supposed to do. What "you're supposed to do" is a complex subject to question because it depends on your own rationale as to whether you're required to do something or not.

[Galen]

Not true, I know plenty of rationals that do what they want as opposed to what they are supposed to do. What "you're supposed to do" is a complex subject to question because it depends on your own rationale as to whether you're required to do something or not.

Ah I see, thanks for the clarification.

[717495]

He's habitually falling into what he wants to do and not what he's supposed to do. That's the statement. Your objection doesn't contradict it.

I know all the time I should be doing something I'm supposed to be doing, meeting the appropriate standards, going to the work bell, etc. Basically doing which gives a worthy benefit, and it's all subjective. However I also know that I don't do this as much as I should be. I'm also fairly low energy. It can be considered as rationing one's energy, but to me it is simply not having enough, and not using much, as well as wanting to think (meditate) and not move. This is me. IP temperament suites me fairly well. I can see you as IP temperament too.

[Galen]

Where to find your dual as an ISTp

oh boy

....skip sunday night football and go to vintage sales.

I don't watch football

There are many ESFp's at these sales and few of other types that I have observed but your odds will be really good here.

girls are gross

[Morcheeba]

Personally, I always thought of you as EII.