In light of the DarkAngelFireWolf69 articles that I've been reading, which speak of dynamic functions as causing 'excitation' as opposed to causing 'breaking'...
Is it safe to say that dynamics (Ip's & Ej's) are as a rule more expressedly extrovert than statics (Ij's & Ep's) when they are 'extroverting'?
From my perspective it looks a lot like the dynamic extrovert functions (Te and Fe) always seek to set a sequence of events in motion, thus having their user expect to be reacted to in the right manner. Static extrovert functions (Se and Ne) on the other hand just throw a piece of info 'out there' and don't expect a specific reaction. The first is ritualistic in the sense that 'socializing' is. The second, while unmistakenly extroverted, is more self-contained.
But is this in line with what people are experiencing their daily lives? Everybody, please share your perspectives.


Reply With Quote
types vs.
types. It has been said that
and
will seem more "extroverted" because they are output-based elements.
