Originally Posted by Sol
When Count D says he "looks right through" people and situations that's a tell-tale sign of leading Ni and subdued sensing. You haven't watched his videos carefully if you didn't catch that, though in Sol's case it's more excusable since English is not his native language.
I said about T type. Your argumentation is about N type.
Anyway, I more trust to impressions from nonverbal, than particular words people say, especially in short public interviews. When I type Russians I use nonverbal method as the main too. For offline typing it's best as primary method.
If S type messed with esoterical stuff he may talk about using N methods as common.
> You haven't watched his videos carefully if you didn't catch that, though in Sol's case it's more excusable since English is not his native language.
She has excellent English, but it's not her native too.
He has described social situations as being transparent to him. This is no T in any shape or form.
Blatantly prop up whoever agrees with you. Generic Eastern European corruptionShe has excellent English, but it's not her native too.
It's not enough to think him as T type. To analyse words and behavior you'd need to know the person better and wider, than by short random talking for medias. It needs special questionnaires, at least. Also those words mb partly related to N.
I typed a SLE woman IRL. She perceived herself as emotional, introverted and messed with religion. But she was not such if to compare her with people having F, I types, and her religious interests should be surface. People may perceive themselves wrongly by Jung's types norms or just say anything, especially for public. The wrong self-perception is clear when people do tests and get there wrong types.
> Blatantly prop up whoever agrees with you. Generic Eastern European corruption
She did not say the agreement with my opinion about T as his type.
The corruption is high anywhere, including in Western Europe and USA. You take USA propaganda about Eastern Europe "barbarians" too seriously. Note: USSR [before Gorbachev] had lesser criminal level than USA of those and now days.
Anyway. Count Dankula is not IEI. He looks weird enough to be SLE, for example.
Let's not get carried away here.
You are right I didn't agree with your typing of him. I do agree that I don't think he is IEI. Especially if the main reason for it, is him saying he can "see right through" people. I say that. I have said that to at least two people on this forum. I have seen others say it on this forum too and they don't self type Ni lead. It was a 14 minute video so if the biggest argument for him being IEI is he says he can see through people then I stick with my own impressions.
Not wanting to listen to his grating voice is totally excusable no matter my native language but you are technically correct since I didn't start using English almost exclusively until I was 7.
For me listening to him is kind of like watching paint dry. He is slow, tedious and boring but I am not into youtube celebs. I suppose he could be sp/so (sx last is most likely) and I have nothing against a 9 typing for him but I didn't watch enough of his videos to get an idea of his core fears and motivations. I have no strong impressions of his socionics type but I saw you said T type so I looked. I thought he resembled an SLI I know physically but the impression after listening to him was more SEI because he seemed slow, not saying slow mentally (although he could be that too). Just a slow laid back sensory focused person. I would not throw IEE out the window just yet either.
Last edited by Aylen; 05-02-2018 at 05:33 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Chandler Taslitz [on right] - mb IEI
okLet's not get carried away here.
> if the biggest argument for him being IEI is he says he can see through people then I stick with my own impressions.
the impressions is all we need!
> I would not throw IEE out the window just yet either.
impossibly
Last edited by Sol; 05-02-2018 at 06:42 PM.
You deserved that. I could have said EII, be grateful.
Chandler Taslitz [on right] - mb IEI
ok
> if the biggest argument for him being IEI is he says he can see through people then I stick with my own impressions.
the impressions is all we need!
> I would not throw IEE out the window just yet either.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
