You screwed up C-2 and C-4, Rocky. They should be switched around.C-2 ENTp.
Hmm....
You screwed up C-2 and C-4, Rocky. They should be switched around.C-2 ENTp.
Hmm....
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
You got NiTe.Originally Posted by MysticSonic
'Doh. INTp as my result, huh? I can't say I agree with it at all.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
Mystic, you might very well be an irrational Ti type. That's the best thing I can think of for you. Maybe Jung was only part right in saying that thinkers are rational. Maybe %95 of people with thinking as a dominant function are rational, but then there are a few who have the same functions yet have all the qualitites of an irrational type. Maybe you fit that little "loop whole".
No, I am fairly rational with my decision making; it's just that the rational description within your test had too many qualities which I don't indentify with, such as being well organized.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
Then can you think of a better rational descrption? "Organized" was only one word.
Well, you see, my THOUGHTS are organized fairly well, it's just that when it comes to the external world I have a trouble keeping up with such things as organization.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
Thanks.
I don't know...all INTjs I know are extremely well-organized in their daily life. Perhaps you are just not very INTjish in that regard?
I recall Pedro noting that he isn't well organized.
"To become is just like falling asleep. You never know exactly when it happens, the transition, the magic, and you think, if you could only recall that exact moment of crossing the line then you would understand everything; you would see it all"
"Angels dancing on the head of a pin dissolve into nothingness at the bedside of a dying child."
I'm going to have to second (or third, if you count Pedro) Mystic on this one. Methodical, yes. But my desk is a mess. On the other hand, I do have the next week or so very clearly planned out on my calender...depends on your definition of organized.
TiNe, LII, INTj, etc.
"I feel like I should be making a sarcastic comment right now, but you're just so cute!" - Shego, Kim Possible
Mine went little wrong. I selected D-2 instead of D-3. A reason for this might be that I didn't understand what it meant by orderly vs. disorderly, rational vs. irrational. But after reading more on EII vs IEI, there is no way I am IEI.
I got C4, which is close, and possibly even plausible, I'm beginning to consider ENTp, so I'll pay it. However, I'm not sure if it was easy because I already know what my Socionics type is, and so catered my answer to that.
Warm Regards,
Clowns & Entropy
*licks*
hey @Kim.gif "squeeze")
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
I went with B-4
I'm extremely confident in how people feel towards me. So that immediately ruled out Group A and C. It's a little more murky regarding beliefs which are liable to change depending on my current situation, unless we're talking ethics, ethics and relationships being a focal point of concern, though I think I understand my own health rather well and can care for it very well, granted it's not something I focus much on. So that indicates Group B.
I definitely struggle with thinking sequentially and having organized thoughts. It's why I struggle learning new things and is the source of my current frustrations at work and why I struggle with feeling inadequate, slow and stupid, easily confused and thus error prone, etc. So that rules out 1 and 3. I'm both deep and reflective and a multi-tasker and am an active doer, but I'd say I'm more the initiator, impatient when people drag their feet and so tactfully try to get the momentum going, especially among my group of friends who are more contented to sit, aimlessly bull shit, and watch the TV in spite of expressing a goal. I'd say I prefer to be a part of the action than to sit back, but if I don't connect with the people involved, I don't see much of a point in being there. That and I don't really understand those who only care about their inner world and shut the world out as if it has no importance, staying locked inside and dreaming life away, lacking any visible priorities. It's been one of my pet peeves as of late.
Got B-3>B-2. Some of the irrational vs. Rational was a bit hard for me to gauge, since a lot of my reaction to the descriptions are going to be tinged by my own bias--I can worry that I'm not organized/stable enough, whereas those who are more adaptable might look at my behavior and think that I'm relatively organized/clear-minded. Now which is closer to the truth? It's fuzzy. Nonetheless, 3 seemed like the better answer.
Last edited by suedehead; 05-08-2014 at 11:00 PM.
I got D-2. NiFe.
You seek a great fortune, you three who are now in chains. You will find a fortune, though it will not be the one you seek.
But first you must travel a long and difficult road, a road fraught with peril.
You shall see things, wonderful to tell. You shall see a... cow... on the roof of a cotton house. And, oh, so many startlements.
I cannot tell you how long this road shall be, but fear not the ob-stacles in your path, for fate has vouchsafed your reward.
Though the road may wind, yea, your hearts grow weary, still shall ye follow them, even unto your salvation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pukq_XJmM-k
Yeah It hit correctly
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
C-1
terrible if youre a narcissist, first hand account here
D-2
Cool test
That was like, the easiest test ever.D-2
Cool test
*shifts back to IEI*
I'm not going to get anything done today.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
D-4
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Is IEE your second second type?
Third.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Nvm third = second second so yea
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
ESE is third?
Fuck no. IEE is third. ESE is 40th.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
I got ILI > SLI. This test doesn't account for royally fucked up psyches it appears. I never really did feel at home with SEI, though no type fits.
You transcend typing, Chryssie.
Did I just confuse an ILI? I fucking win.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Who are you confusing? ILI @Chryssie? I'm confused.
Twice! Or three times.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
I think it is safe to say that you are a confusing individual regardless of the type of the audience.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
Hm. None of the above, will have to make my own group.
Group E
I am unconfident in how people feel towards me, how to deal with people in a tactful manner and how to be empathetic towards them.
I am confident in the things I believe in, whether or not I make the right "connections", forcing others to believe in what I do and planning for my future.
I am confident in how to keep myself healthy, what makes me feel good, and how to adjust and take care of my own being.
I am confident in making logical decisions, seperating from my emotions and other people's needs while thinking, and understanding mechanical (non-human) things.
I get LSI/SLI on this. I explain my reasoning below.
I am unconfident in how people feel towards me, how to deal with people in a tactful manner and how to be empathetic towards them.
How people feel towards me- very unconfident. I am always doubting here.
How to deal with people in an tactful manner- somewhat unconfident. I try hard not to offend but I still worry I'm going to unintentionally step over a line.
How to be empathetic towards them- depends on the situation.
I am unconfident in the things I believe in, whether or not I make the right "connections", forcing others to believe in what I do and planning for my future.
I am confident in what I believe in.
Whether or not I make the right "connections"- well it depends. Since this is supposed to measure intuitions, they probably mean conceptual connections which in that case I'm confident. Yet I also think of "connections" as relationship oriented and then I'm not as confident.
Forcing others to believe what I do- unconfident, but why would I want to force my beliefs on others anyways?
Planning for my future- confident
I am confident in how to keep myself healthy, what makes me feel good, and how to adjust and take care of my own being.
Confident in all of this. I know how to do it, I don't always choose the healthiest option though.
I am confident in making logical decisions, seperating from my emotions and other people's needs while thinking, and understanding mechanical (non-human) things.
Logical decisions- yes
Separating my emotions other peoples' needs while thinking- usually
Understanding mechanical (non human things)- machines not so much, abstract logical systems- yes
So overall it points towards ST > NT
For part 2, #2 and #3 fit equally well. Ij or Ip temperament.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
