Quote Originally Posted by consentingadult View Post
An example: suppose you stand trial in a court of law for some crime, and the DA can not come up with convincing evidence, should the judge or jury pass sentence anyway based on the poor evidence that is available? That is what a lot of people want (to the extend that if we let them have their way, innocent people are lynched), but thank God, we do have decent working courts of law in the western world.

The principle is: it is not a disgrace to say: "I do not have enough information to reach a conclusion, so I refrain from drawing one".
i like you. (:

You have made a very good case for leading Si, but implied has made a very good case against Te. I see lot of Fi seeking, but no valuing of Ti. From a Socionic prspective, this is a contrdiction in terms. To me, it seems there is a hole in Dylan's Model A make up.

My stand: I refrain from drawing conclusions on Dylan's type for the reason that his psychology seems to indicate a non-personality related disorder.

Of course, it's perfectly ok if you still want to pursue typing him, because I can not exclude the possibility that he is typeable after all.
what would you make of someone like r crumb, who i've started a thread on in this subforum? i actually am prone to type him as INFp but i can't say that he very blatantly comes off as . to me it's easier to spot a non-existent interest in Te at all, and a very Ni base.