Primary source material is considered good evidence in most fields, not sure why this one should be exempt? Most of the IE assignments I made were derived from that
IE semantics page I've linked before. I don't think the assignments are entirely perfect, but I'm not
just pulling them out of thin-air either. It's a start at least, and that's all it was intended to be.
I'd link interviews, but that base has been somewhat covered. Do you want more?
But where pray tell is your good case, other than vague allusions to supposed instances of him flaking out on his involvement with various causes and what not? Let alone your inference about how that suggests
PoLR…