Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 121 to 157 of 157

Thread: Differences between LSE-ESTj and LSI-ISTj

  1. #121
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy View Post
    As far as I'm concerned, AB's response to Maritsa is also a nail in the coffin for the LSE litmus test. There's no doubt he likes to play Maritsa's dual. It's a feeling-role he embraced partly to overplay his self-typing LSE, and partly because he was responding to Maritsa's inaccurate information. The irony is Maritsa isn't even an INFj and any LSE, or frankly SLE, would be repelled by her forthright attempts to manage people emotionally.
    Yeah, you're dead right about the emotional manipulation. Obersturmführer Airborne and Queen Mother Maritsa seemed the same people to me from the beginning. If not the fact they're different persons I would really think they, he, she is some hydra. In fact both share a history, clinical history, asylum for mentally ill, both are drama queens and stuff like that plus that Dalai Lama Master Ammonius(?) who wrote about, I don't even know what the fuck he wrote about - pages for pages of letters, pages for pages of shite.

    Alphas and Betas in Delta Quadra. On top of that Ryu the Pocahontas saying he and Obersturmführer are the same type. Haha! I hated 'Alphabetadeltans' or something all the time.

    By the way, how did you find this forum and how long are you in this field if I may ask.

  2. #122
    Hot Scalding Gayser's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The evolved form of Warm Soapy Water
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    14,902
    Mentioned
    661 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    imo

    estj: More aggressive, firm stance and gait.

    istj: Erotic, a bit more laid back....but still kinda tense/jerky. A lot of porn stars are istjs.

    I don't doubt he gets a lot of sex and manipulates people...but I know more about Airborne's personal life reading his posts than I know about most LSI, LSE, and SLEs who I've known for years. I'm certain he's ESFj.
    Damnit I hate this mentality we all have. You can still get a lot of sex and be a decent person.

  3. #123
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    382 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    ESTjs are more likely to talk and ISTjs have humor as opposed to humor.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  4. #124
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If we're gonna talk about them in terms of anger, from my experience ESTj anger tends to be in bursts, little discrete periods where anger/frustration is unleashed, or at least what seems to be anger building (at least with E8s). Then once that period is over, it's smooth sailing again until the next bump in the road. On the other hand, ISTjs generally seem like they're at a sorta low, constant level of pervasive anger, like it's just below the surface but you can definitely tell it's there (I'm sure the intertype b/w me and ISTjs has biased my observations though )

  5. #125
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The biggest difference is probably that they are both very stubborn.

  6. #126
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarno View Post
    The biggest difference is probably that they are both very stubborn.
    Beg your pardon?

  7. #127
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    Beg your pardon?
    Me was joking.

  8. #128
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    382 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    If we're gonna talk about them in terms of anger, from my experience ESTj anger tends to be in bursts, little discrete periods where anger/frustration is unleashed, or at least what seems to be anger building (at least with E8s). Then once that period is over, it's smooth sailing again until the next bump in the road. On the other hand, ISTjs generally seem like they're at a sorta low, constant level of pervasive anger, like it's just below the surface but you can definitely tell it's there (I'm sure the intertype b/w me and ISTjs has biased my observations though )

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  9. #129
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,200
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    If we're gonna talk about them in terms of anger, from my experience ESTj anger tends to be in bursts, little discrete periods where anger/frustration is unleashed, or at least what seems to be anger building (at least with E8s). Then once that period is over, it's smooth sailing again until the next bump in the road. On the other hand, ISTjs generally seem like they're at a sorta low, constant level of pervasive anger, like it's just below the surface but you can definitely tell it's there (I'm sure the intertype b/w me and ISTjs has biased my observations though )
    I like this.


    I think it was mentioned earlier in the thread that LSE at a glance have a more friendly, soft and direct feel to them. LSI are more controlled and while not necessarily distant, are emotionally turned off, and a bit stiff. In general, LSI are just more intimidating before you get to know them.

    Imo, LSI are most characterized by their self-discipline. LSE are most characterized by their ability to get things done, and get it done right. Sometimes its hard to distinguish between those two characteristics.
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  10. #130
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy View Post
    I've got Airborne as ESFj. At first I thought he was an ESTj, but his earlier days struck me as too Jekyll and Hydish. He also has a much softer underbelly than the more macho ESTj or ISTj type could hope to pull off. He has overcliched ideas on LSE control, Beta STs, and the way that LSEs view themselves. And he orders the details in his stories so sequentially for effect it's ridiculously ESFj....and he lacks the "jock terseness" or technical refinement to cover either subtype of LSE...it's also true that Te can be more biased and emotional in their opinions, but they make more efforts to atleast sound objective and process-oriented (he varies though, I think he's close between F and T)...Airborne has also claimed he's much different in person, and ime LSE and LIE are the two types that act pretty similar online and in person.

    As far as I'm concerned, AB's response to Maritsa is also a nail in the coffin for the LSE litmus test. There's no doubt he likes to play Maritsa's dual. It's a feeling-role he embraced partly to overplay his self-typing LSE, and partly because he was responding to Maritsa's inaccurate information. The irony is Maritsa isn't even an INFj and any LSE, or frankly SLE, would be repelled by her forthright attempts to manage people emotionally. Smilingeyes didn't waste any time telling her to take a hike.

    I don't doubt he gets a lot of sex and manipulates people...but I know more about Airborne's personal life reading his posts than I know about most LSI, LSE, and SLEs who I've known for years. I'm certain he's ESFj.

    And if the triangular rapport between Airborne, Pied Piper , and Ammonius wasn't alpha airiness at its best, I'd be hard-pressed to find a better example of it.
    Of course I manage people emotionally and ethically; I teach LSE that their behavior is of a certain ethics and they promise to correct their actions in return, mostly, I teach by shaming them into doing what is good/bad. If they don't accept my ethical corrections then it's up to them not to take part in duality; it would be the same as if saying that a certain EII does not want to be controlled by LSE, who are controlling with regards to efficiency in activities.

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Yeah, you're dead right about the emotional manipulation. Obersturmführer Airborne and Queen Mother Maritsa seemed the same people to me from the beginning. If not the fact they're different persons I would really think they, he, she is some hydra. In fact both share a history, clinical history, asylum for mentally ill, both are drama queens and stuff like that plus that Dalai Lama Master Ammonius(?) who wrote about, I don't even know what the fuck he wrote about - pages for pages of letters, pages for pages of shite.

    Alphas and Betas in Delta Quadra. On top of that Ryu the Pocahontas saying he and Obersturmführer are the same type. Haha! I hated 'Alphabetadeltans' or something all the time.

    By the way, how did you find this forum and how long are you in this field if I may ask.
    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLO
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  11. #131
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    If we're gonna talk about them in terms of anger, from my experience ESTj anger tends to be in bursts, little discrete periods where anger/frustration is unleashed, or at least what seems to be anger building (at least with E8s). Then once that period is over, it's smooth sailing again until the next bump in the road. On the other hand, ISTjs generally seem like they're at a sorta low, constant level of pervasive anger, like it's just below the surface but you can definitely tell it's there (I'm sure the intertype b/w me and ISTjs has biased my observations though )
    This falls into the pattern of dynamic types having more changeable moods, which doesn't seem to go with rationality/irrationality despite some temperament descriptions placing it there.

  12. #132
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Azeroffs View Post
    I think it was mentioned earlier in the thread that LSE at a glance have a more friendly, soft and direct feel to them. LSI are more controlled and while not necessarily distant, are emotionally turned off, and a bit stiff. In general, LSI are just more intimidating before you get to know them.

    Imo, LSI are most characterized by their self-discipline. LSE are most characterized by their ability to get things done, and get it done right. Sometimes its hard to distinguish between those two characteristics.

  13. #133
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    382 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pied Piper View Post
    Are you agreeing with his both LSE and LSI depictions, or only the LSE one?
    Both, though I'm not an authority on the latter.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  14. #134
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ni PoLR and Ni activating.

    ESTj's can't feel time very well, when they get involved in a hobby, they can lose the sense of time and go at what they are doing for a long time.Aushra wrote that ESTj's have to stick with their plans rigidly and any uncertainty or things that cause them to deviate from plans, they except poorly.

    Fits of Rage and anger, ESTj's unlike ISTj's have periodic fits of anger that come through. ISTj's are much more even tempered and milder. ISTj's also have the ability to reduce things to concise things so don't bother with collecting redundant information

    ESTj's frequently commit ethical slips and because of this they require stable relations and uncertainty really immobilizes them.

    Te, ESTj's concentrate on methods, on how to do things and if something done is efficient, meets needs, and give advice on how things can be improved. ISTj's don't give advice about these things.

    Both ESTj's and ISTj's show good manners and bread. ESTj's will call attention to themselves, to admire or solicit admiration of their selves, either on what they have accomplished, the things they have purchased that perform well, or their skill and ability in doing something better then others.

    LSI don't care about processes and methods they keep track of objects and systems. LSE do keep track of methods, how something is done, how things were arrived the way they were.

    For further reference please read the Augusta's writing on LSE and LSI found on socionics.org; you may use Google translator to convert the text into english.

    http://translate.google.com/translat...socionics.org/
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 09-15-2010 at 01:53 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  15. #135
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by None View Post
    Since both are XSTJ, they´re similar.

    I´m quite confident I´m ESTJ but sometimes I wonder. How to really tell one of these types from the other when I type other people. Both seem to march while walking. Both are rigid - at least in their more serious part of their lives. Both are kind of organized.

    So far the only difference I can see is an ESTJ has a shortest margin of tolerance to getting very upset and having an outburst, while ISTJ is more controlled in his emotions hardest to lose temper.
    There is a lot more depth to be explored here.

    Valuing Fe vs Fi is a huge difference
    Valuing Te vs Ti is a huge difference
    Being different temperments IJ and EJ is a huge difference


    Only very superficially are types that are one "letter different" in the four letter code similar.

  16. #136
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by None View Post
    lol Pied Piper , now any Logical type with a sense of humor is SLE?

    I don´t play with people in real life, I don´t like to do it, but having Te [this is my guess] gives me somewhat of a ability to be manipulative and controlling of people, which btw is in tune with LSE, since LSE is 'the administrator' he has to control all the resources at hand including people.

    I don´t consider SLE seriously, because I´m too stiff and rigid in real life, I don´t talk during classes when the teacher is speaking [something SLEs often do], I get annoyed by such unpolite behavior and I have that xSTJ military way of walking, I march, I don´t walk, even in relaxed situations. This all points to xSTJ if you know descriptions of these two types.

    And I really don´t think I have in ego block, I know people who do, they´re kind of different in a sense, and I see lots of in me, so I am probably LSE indeed.

    Anyway you can think what you want, there´s Heavy calling me ESFj, there´s a bunch of ppl who think I´m ESTp like you do, and there´s a bunch who think I´m ISTj, I have no intention of convincing anyone or stopping them.

    After all, life is much more serious than discussions in an internet forum, I have other problems more real and concrete than 'virtual' things which are barely real.
    YES
    I love this about my duals, it allows me to sit back and relax; I'm over worked as it is and can easily over work myself in any given task to concentration at extreme levels of minute carefulness and conscientiousness in a task that I undertake. I can't make my tasks efficient, and I can't figure out how to eliminate those pesky steps from the start of a project to the end, hence taking too much time and energy at a given task. I love my walking, talking energy savers LOL.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  17. #137
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default LSI or LSE

    An LSI and LSE walk into a bar, which one is most likely to compliment on how people come off by saying "people are lively, upbeat, cheerful"?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  18. #138
    Ver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    net
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    526
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSI of course.

  19. #139
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,372
    Mentioned
    112 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSI - comment on what he sees
    LSE - Refers to what he knows
    Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.

  20. #140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan View Post
    An LSI and LSE walk into a bar, which one is most likely to compliment on how people come off by saying "people are lively, upbeat, cheerful"?
    "lively, upbeat, cheerful" is not only Fe at work.It could also be Ne or manipulative Fi . I guess what an LSI would appreciate are social interactions that serve a clear purpose and nothing is reduntant and incohesive so that LSI does not get worn-off. So,the best thing to happen would be a Fe base approaching the LSI and making him/her feel integrated.The fact that it is hard to do this without support would cause a "fuck,now what" reaction and possibly bitterness (in case we're talking about primitive Ti). An,LSE, having Fe-role would have an easier time harmonizing with the upbeat environement and also commenting on it.

  21. #141
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jennifer View Post
    "lively, upbeat, cheerful" is not only Fe at work.It could also be Ne or manipulative Fi . I guess what an LSI would appreciate are social interactions that serve a clear purpose and nothing is reduntant and incohesive so that LSI does not get worn-off. So,the best thing to happen would be a Fe base approaching the LSI and making him/her feel integrated.The fact that it is hard to do this without support would cause a "fuck,now what" reaction and possibly bitterness (in case we're talking about primitive Ti). An,LSE, having Fe-role would have an easier time harmonizing with the upbeat environement and also commenting on it.
    He doesn't need any help in integrating; he's very aggressive about going in and doing that, does that still make this guy LSI?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  22. #142
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Out of those two it's the SEE, Maritsa.

  23. #143
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,724
    Mentioned
    250 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How could typing a person hinge on one isolated behavioral trait?

    Personally, I don't recall any LSIs I know caring much about an "upbeat" atmosphere. They comment on a variety things like integrity, intensity, aesthetic properties of an environment, people being deep/shallow, and people being "too lowbrow" or "too snooty," and they express to me concerns about fitting in or not, even if it's to say they don't care if they do. Some of them seem worried they are being judged by someone and speculate about that. After a social occasion, these LSIs might analyze the dynamics just experienced--they might seek my input on understanding it, and contribute observations about things I missed, like, "So-and-so was very uneasy when you asked her that question" or "Person X is very insecure." When I ask how they know, it's often something like a physical gesture or pattern that clued them in. The LSIs are more certain than I am in that way--the person definitely was like that, according to them; I just feel my way along and suspect things, or I see big patterns better than current states.

    The LSEs I know are more likely than LSIs to expect a group mood be "positive," or demand that it be so or engineer it to be so. "Upbeat" seems more like an LSE churning out some flat-seeming Fe. With LSEs I have noticed sometimes a discomfort with me assessing social dynamics a posteriori. They seem to prefer, if anything, to predict that in advance as a series of steps.
    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  24. #144
    High Priestess glam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,371
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CONFIMED View Post
    The LSEs I know are more likely than LSIs to expect a group mood be "positive," or demand that it be so or engineer it to be so. "Upbeat" seems more like an LSE churning out some flat-seeming Fe.
    yeah, that's exactly what i thought when reading the OP. if anything, it could be a Te observation (referring to the characteristics of the general activity in the bar.)

  25. #145
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    17,948
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CONFIMED View Post
    Personally, I don't recall any LSIs I know caring much about an "upbeat" atmosphere. They comment on a variety things like integrity, intensity, aesthetic properties of an environment, people being deep/shallow, and people being "too lowbrow" or "too snooty,"
    There goes my LSIness.

  26. #146
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North Italy
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,806
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSIs are often the providers of positive atmosphere (barring cultural influences). Positivist, emotion-creating, merry.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  27. #147
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've gathered a lot of information with this regard. I think it would be safe to say that in the op it is LSI because they are looking for a varied emotional atmosphere while the LSE is looking at what is being done, the dynamics, rather than a static perception of how people at the bar are like.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  28. #148
    yeves's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    TIM
    Si 6 spsx
    Posts
    1,359
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    ESTj's frequently commit ethical slips and because of this they require stable relations and uncertainty really immobilizes them.
    wouldn't ISTjs be as likely to make ethical mistakes having Fi role as the ESTjs with Fi suggestive?

  29. #149
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yeves View Post
    wouldn't ISTjs be as likely to make ethical mistakes having Fi role as the ESTjs with Fi suggestive?
    Well ISTj are more empathetic.
    Well ISTj are more empathetic. They may get moody and suddenly curse or be jolly good mood but they are not as restrained in public because they react like Ij temperament. Lse will restrain themselves enough to take their crankiness out on their close relations because these are people who will listen to them and they can still look good to the public. They also berate others and call people "bitches" ect where ISTj may curse at the situation like saying suddenly "F". LSe are bitchy because they are extraverts and talk more. LSI are moody because of their Fi they hide more emotions inside but they like an Fe varried emotional atmospheres of joking and enthusiasm. LsE like a relaxed si atmoshere that may seem quite borring to LSI like relaxing with a movie and cuddeling at home. Yes LSI cuddle but watch movies that are much more emotionally varried. Like my cousin and I may stay in and listen to very toned down melodic music not Beethoven which is intenser.
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 08-07-2014 at 12:54 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  30. #150
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Being extraverts LSE are much more keen on or aware of how they come off and because of that they are llinear in varried social circumstances. While to the public they are the philanthropist and nice people to their family they arw demanding directors who easily get upset when people don't pay attention to them even though thwy direct out of being certain of their view on what works. This creates two different people in one but LSE know and recognize their place so that they can work within systems while LSI challenge them sometimes carelessly.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  31. #151
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I posted this because I was trying to determine if my son's father was LSI or LSE. Now I think he's probably SLE.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  32. #152
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Airman View Post
    lol Pied Piper , now any Logical type with a sense of humor is SLE?

    I don´t play with people in real life, I don´t like to do it, but having Te [this is my guess] gives me somewhat of a ability to be manipulative and controlling of people, which btw is in tune with LSE, since LSE is 'the administrator' he has to control all the resources at hand including people.

    I don´t consider SLE seriously, because I´m too stiff and rigid in real life, I don´t talk during classes when the teacher is speaking [something SLEs often do], I get annoyed by such unpolite behavior and I have that xSTJ military way of walking, I march, I don´t walk, even in relaxed situations. This all points to xSTJ if you know descriptions of these two types.

    And I really don´t think I have in ego block, I know people who do, they´re kind of different in a sense, and I see lots of in me, so I am probably LSE indeed.

    Anyway you can think what you want, there´s Heavy calling me ESFj, there´s a bunch of ppl who think I´m ESTp like you do, and there´s a bunch who think I´m ISTj, I have no intention of convincing anyone or stopping them.

    After all, life is much more serious than discussions in an internet forum, I have other problems more real and concrete than 'virtual' things which are barely real.
    I just realized you COULD be ESTJ
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  33. #153
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Posts
    444
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Someone actually gets these two types confused lol

  34. #154
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pandemic candy View Post
    Someone actually gets these two types confused lol
    Lol
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  35. #155
    Mairon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    68
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ESTjs want the people around them to see them as strong and capable people, ready to take control of things. This is why they give a more angry image on the outside than they show themselves to be in everyday life.

    Se Demonstrative: image that you give to the outside (alfa man, efficiency, duty, power etc.) but that you do not value how much the creative Si is. With family members or friends, they can be intense and caring (Fi suggestive).

    For ISTjs it works the other way around. Apparently they are calm and adaptable, but one perceives (as another user has already said) a sort of hidden anger in them, which is well known by his family or close friends.

    In short, the demonstrative Si attempts to conceal their creative, which is clearly visible when the demonstrative is not essential in the context.

  36. #156
    Renna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Posts
    469
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    All LSE I know look angry and bossy and nitpicking

    LSI look calm and polite, easily bend themself to the group. But they have a fucking psychopath weak Fe smile

  37. #157
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bump
    If anyone has worthy data to add
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •