*Last shred of type doubt eliminated.*
*Last shred of type doubt eliminated.*
Rather unlikely. I don't like saying something is impossible though.
That darned thing put 'likely' up as the poll title. Or maybe I did. In any case, fixed.
Appearantly I am not authorized to fix an error in a poll that I myself have erected. Some moderator help me, please?
There should be an "unlikely" or some similar response though... not just likely, possible, and impossible.
Yeah I kind of figured you'd be among the people not to consider me as an identical. If the two of us are both ENTj's it would definitely shed some light on the immense diversity of traits within the bounds of a single type.
conceivable, but i've always seen you as LII and i haven't observed anything that would suggest otherwise.
Ok, if some moderator reads this, please add 'unlikely' to the list.
You are using crazy amounts of Ti.
You could very well be ENTJ.
In my opinion socionics is currently not really worth the time and trouble, but if you want to learn socionics your own type should be one of the last things you look at. It will emerge eventually, but whatever you do, please do not build your identity around your type. It is harmful in the long run.
"Arnie is strong, rightfully angry and wants to kill somebody."
martin_g_karlsson
![]()
Not particularly. Introverted vibe.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Great advice.Originally Posted by CuriousSoul