This is one of those rare times when I disagree with you, Marie, at least on some of those. I agree that it's a definite possibility that Monica Bellucci is LSI (she's some kind of logical introvert, anyway), and I couldn't find enough on Helena Christensen to type her.
However, I think Christina Hendricks is some kind of base-Fe type, possibly ESE -- in her interviews she's always talking about excitement and being excited, and exudes a lot of emotional expressiveness. She doesn't seem to comment on Ti issues in the interviews I saw. However, I admit that ESE is not a typing I'm confident in; I didn't get duality vibes from her like I often do with interviews of other ESEs.
And of course, I argued extensively in a previous thread, I think Catherine Zeta-Jones is EIE. But I won't restart that argument here.
I won't even bother to comment on all the weird socionix/Model X typings, except to say that Sarah Michelle Gellar is blatantly ESE, as seen in the following interview:
Seriously, socionix.com has some pretty hilarious typings, and "Sarah Michelle Gellar=LSI" is one of them.
Quaero Veritas.
Christina Hendricks is indeed an Fe base type. Fe-ISFp I'm quite certain.
wow so much disagreement
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
*HITS PANIC BUTTON*
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
Fe really? She always comes across as incredibly monotonous, calm and barely emotionally reactant.
An example, though she's like this in all of the interview vids I checked-out
By any chance do you have a link to the vid you're referring to? Or was it on TV?
Explain?
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Are you still on that bullshit? And how does that even make sense? Why would I like my quasi more than my supervisor?
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I honestly don't even know how to respond to you sometimes. It bewilders me that you think we are semi-duals.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Not interested.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
That was actually the main interview I was looking at, plus a few others that weren't much different (probably the same ones you watched ). Interesting that we came to such different conclusions based on the same evidence!
To me, in that video she comes across as much more extraverted and free with her emotions than your typical Ti-base. Her hand gestures are loose and open like an extravert's, and she always seems to be smiling or laughing.
Compare with this interview of Gina Torres:
IMDb Video: I Think I Love My Wife
While Ms. Torres does smile, it's brief and quickly returns to a serious, analytical expression. Ms. Hendricks, on the other hand, smiles and laughs much more frequently, and her default expression is a quieter smile, not "serious analysis". Ms. Torres is always saying "I think this" and "I think that", providing an analysis of the movie or situation, while Ms. Hendricks simply relates stories and things that have happened to her.
Anyway, that's just my thoughts on the subject.
Quaero Veritas.
Thanks Krig, I'll put her type on hold for now until there's conclusive evidence pointing one way or another
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
I don't know, it's strange -- there seems to be a common tendency on this board to type as LSI people (especially women) who display a lot more emotion than I tend to associate with base Ti. Until I study it more thoroughly, I'm not entirely sure if it's everyone else who's wrong, or just me.
Quaero Veritas.
I have met the breed of LSI who shows no emotions; and who almost fits the stereotype to a tee. I have generally kept away from them, but since discovering I was EIE I found at least one person I mistyped as SLI to be LSI and it seems that the showing no emotions stereotype is pretty damn exaggerated; they show at least a decent amount of emotion. Obviously its not the same as Fe egos but theirs a clear difference between them and those of SLI's, they look much more comfortable with its usage and the interaction feels alot smoother, less awkward, more flexible and varied. I think sometimes it is something that has to be 'activated' in them, so to speak. No idea whose right or wrong in here, but yes I hope you and others would look into it. LSI's dont get that much recognition around here; no wonder they barely stick around
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
You're right on here... LSIs show emotion when you show emotion, (Fe,) and engage them in conversation...
I agree with you--peoples' stereotypes of LSIs here are ridiculous... They're not rigid, stiff people... The army-like hierarchy stereotype is particularly incorrect -- LSIs are "hierarchical" in the way they think and make mental connections. This doesn't equate to "all LSIs love the army, and are rigid, stiff assholes..." That's the stereotype, and it's wrong.
There is a particular difference in personality between the LSI subtypes. The type you're describing sounds like a Ti-LSI, (quiet but sympathetic when engaged in conversation... In general, they are pretty sarcastic.) The Se-LSI can seem extroverted--they're often talkative and all over the place.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! totally bullshit, except winona typing
and johnny depp... his type is for me really difficult to determine, from the vi - lse, from the interview - some introvert, from the roles he choose - introvert, maybe nf or sf, from his relationships - fi-seeking, it's sooo confused, he's mysterious like omg ; dddddd
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
short-haired girl...LSI-Ti
kid with the glasses...ILE-Ti
kid with the hat and sunglasses....IEE-Fi
blonde-haired girl...EII-Fi
I think Gregg Wallace might be one.
Rodrigo Duterte....LSI-Ti
Rodrigo Duterte - mb LSI
Renee Enriquez...LSI-Se