no just dont really know I find her very attractive though meh was like I dont care
goto sleep
no just dont really know I find her very attractive though meh was like I dont care
goto sleep
{♠x<º))))><¸.·´¯`·.¸IcEPiCk¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>x♠ }
ENTp, IMO.Originally Posted by IcEPiCk
YummyOriginally Posted by IcEPiCk
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
ya you havent seen his mannerisms in TV... Plus his smile Ive seen on ENFps before...
trust
{♠x<º))))><¸.·´¯`·.¸IcEPiCk¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>x♠ }
Are those all Canadian news people?Originally Posted by IcEPiCk
Topaz
The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the Mountain of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity. It will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is my one weakness.
Are those all Canadian news people?Originally Posted by IcEPiCk
Topaz
The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the Mountain of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity. It will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is my one weakness.
ya, minus the last one shes from CNN... Mary Snow I think.
{♠x<º))))><¸.·´¯`·.¸IcEPiCk¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>x♠ }
ya, minus the last one shes from CNN... Mary Snow I think.
{♠x<º))))><¸.·´¯`·.¸IcEPiCk¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>x♠ }
no. 3 is definitely a logical type. I think she is an ENTj/INTp.
asd
no. 3 is definitely a logical type. I think she is an ENTj/INTp.
asd
I'll give you that, I used to think I had other pics of other expressions...
She majored in political science.
Ive seen some expressions of her before I swear that were very enfp but meh
I will agree with your argument until/if I can justify it with other data... The other two definitey are ENFps however.
{♠x<º))))><¸.·´¯`·.¸IcEPiCk¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>x♠ }
I'll give you that, I used to think I had other pics of other expressions...
She majored in political science.
Ive seen some expressions of her before I swear that were very enfp but meh
I will agree with your argument until/if I can justify it with other data... The other two definitey are ENFps however.
{♠x<º))))><¸.·´¯`·.¸IcEPiCk¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>x♠ }
agreed with you on that. that was my first thought. i could see ISTp and ENTj getting on pretty well together, honestly.Originally Posted by heath
agreed with you on that. that was my first thought. i could see ISTp and ENTj getting on pretty well together, honestly.Originally Posted by heath
I think logical type pairs have an easier time in asymmetrical(entj-istp, estp-entj, entp-istj) relationships because these relationships usually involve discussion of impersonal topics and don't usually contain personal sentiment. This is especially true if the pair in question is the same gender. But, at the same time, if these people are forced to be close(immediate family) there can definitely be problems. Logical types also are more set in 'who they are' than ethical types so they aren't really put out if someone disagrees with them, or thinks poorly of them. Thoughts from the community? I'm very horrible at socionics. Most of the time I'm spewing common sense and masking it with a few socionics terms.
asd
I think logical type pairs have an easier time in asymmetrical(entj-istp, estp-entj, entp-istj) relationships because these relationships usually involve discussion of impersonal topics and don't usually contain personal sentiment. This is especially true if the pair in question is the same gender. But, at the same time, if these people are forced to be close(immediate family) there can definitely be problems. Logical types also are more set in 'who they are' than ethical types so they aren't really put out if someone disagrees with them, or thinks poorly of them. Thoughts from the community? I'm very horrible at socionics. Most of the time I'm spewing common sense and masking it with a few socionics terms.
asd