No, I've never tried coke. Go join poli parrot in the dunce's corner.Originally Posted by Tackk
No, I've never tried coke. Go join poli parrot in the dunce's corner.
Fair enough. Poli over the flapping cunt, it is.
good bye
ENTP
Sociotypes that flap their arms uncontrollably, are ILE, that's useful bit of info.
LIE, Creative subtype. He is not EP sociotype, but his subtype makes him seem like one superficially.
You think he is a magician able to pull things unimaginable?
I've no idea on his type... I could buy SLE or LIE (though I have never.........................never met an LIE like him before).
Django
Django: ESI-Se
Dr. Schultz - ILE
Calvin Candie - SEE
Stephen - LSI?
Broomhilda - SEI
People have said I remind them of Beatrix from Kill Bill. I'm not sure how much I like or dislike that.
Hans Landa?
I love his movies...the violence does not feel real to me. It is just entertainment. I also love Oliver Stone movies. They have a similar vibe style for me.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Lololololololol @Legerdemain (damnit sry @transaerodemain) and I were watching this last night and talking about how Butch and Fabienne were *exactly* like us. Like, the scene with them when they were telling each other how much they loved each other was extra impactful because it was like watching the two of us on screen.
And 4srs I LOVE blueberry pancakes.
Bb i promise i will nevr 4get ur watch!!! I <3 u so much.
Jim, Invisible. "Socionics something something". The16types.info shoutbox; May 15, 2014.
All I know is that his movies really weren't made forpeople.
LIE!
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
He is closer to LSE than LIE, but he is definitely SLE.
IEE-Ne Sx/So
After watching this, I have finally arrived at the conclusion that he is actually IEE-Ne Sx/So (7w6 > 6w7).
The interviewer is LSE btw. He helps with showing the contrast between Te and Ne lead.
Sx/So people usually come across as Se valuing because they have this "confrontational"/(semi-)revolutionary vibe and motivation.
But watching the interview, it becomes apparent that Tarantino is actually IEE-Ne.
IEE-Ne can appear similar to an NT because of the boosted Te HA.
His movies have a lot of Counterphobic 6 elements.
Talks in terms of dynamic perception.
(Above satement is static. Static has definjng quality that closes the flow with closure.)
I think directors need to be vdynamic because static are hated by the critics.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Why is he 4D ethics?
Subtype can skew things a bit. His strongest IE is technically Ne.
With IEE-Ne, their Fe is more subdued, for it is not boosted and not valued.
IEE-Ne
1. Ne ("4.5" D)
2. Fe / Ni ("3.5" D)
3. Te / Fi ("2.5" D)
4. Se / Ti ("1.5" D)
5. Si ("0.5" D)
Tarantino seems to be both Ne lead and Te valuing to me.
His Ethics are there, just a bit subdued as I said. His Communication Style is classic "Passionate", which is ExFx.
He's a beta NF, Ni subtype. His movies are die-hard beta stuff.
His movies fascinate me and his dialogues are so unique, often expertly paced and rivetting - how much tension did you feel while Jews hide under a nazi officer while he ominously, yet charmingly drank a glass of milk? These character interactions are immediatly distinguishable as Quintin's. He can create so much in these tiny micro comsic worlds. 'Jackie Brown' is a real under rated highlight if you are a Quintin fan.
He is so weird and intense and yet fascinating as a person. No current opinion on type and I don't hold any opinion as to major informational element themes are attracting certain people, because I think they have broad appeal anyway.
The last time I seriously looked into it I tentatively concluded LIE. I still consider EIE and SEE plausible options though. There is no doubt whatsoever that he is an Se valuing extrovert.
There was an interview where someone criticized him for the violence in his movies and what kind of message that sends. Essentially his response was that he's not responsible for what the viewers take from it, he feels no need to "manage" this aspect. He basically just makes movies that he thinks are cool. He also is highly imaginative -- he imagines entire movies in his head before writing them, very into the Ni storytelling aspect -- the Inglourious Basterds screenplay ended up being a giant novel that was later cut down to size. He seems to draw from a lot of knowledge about movies and history etc. I see the bringing back of classic actors as an NiFi kind of sentimental nostalgia thing.
The main thing I find strange is that he does seem to use emotional/effusive language more directly than an LIE would normally be comfortable doing.
Last edited by Exodus; 11-13-2017 at 05:13 AM.
Used to think he's ILE (somehow Ne-ish), but he's probably LIE-Ni.
There seems to be high degree of similarity. LIE's are dynamically trollish. Progression of story where they are plugged in. ILE's do stuff in another dimension and separate themselves from their internal views.
I have seen few creative LIE's. Pretty similar to them. Needs Uma to kick his behind.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Listen to the LIE speak here, 6 minutes are enough to see it:
Strong and vivid dynamic logics (Essentially: "Do it this way, that way, shooting this, that, using this and this...! What I found out from doing this is...") with a lot of temporal intuition, juggling events and dates. Optimistic entrepreneur stereotype pretty much embodied, he states it himself.
In general: He can't value-
. He glorifies Gamma SFs in this movies, watch for the lead roles! It all leaves the viewer entirely uncomfortable as I said,
role shows up once saying he wants to make going to the movies fun again, but under the premise of
Made up my mind about the subtype - LIE-Ni. Sois the strongest element. His movies are cult flicks precisely because he always manages to pull something new out of his sleeve. "It could be the new way!", he says in the interview. He wants to reinvent film every time and effectively does so. He also has less of a rational approach because I suppose both irrational intuition elements are at work there. Again this excludes ILE because they ignore
and
as a package instead. Quentin however, really doesn't go into
christopher nolan might be LIE
If he is LIE, then I'm not LIE. And I'm pretty sure that I am LIE.
my friend who I long typed as ILI talks just like Tarantino, and I always associated the mumbling and stuttering with irrationality, so its hard for me to let that go, but on the other hand I could totally reshuffle things in my head and see them both as LIE. maybe a lot of what I attributed to Fe polr was more Si polr in how its this kind of slightly disconcerting energy... maybe the irrationality comes across in speech more if its producing, hence Ni creative may manifest the kind of sometimes strange speech patterns in a way that Ni base may not, since Te creative is more articulate
in general it seems like Ne creatives don't come across with the same preponderance of ticks and so forth, although I suppose that could be a product of 2d Si reigning it in
Last edited by Bertrand; 11-14-2017 at 04:34 AM.
My ILE friend loves his movies atm.
Quentin Tarantino - ISFJ - Dreiser
Beta NF, Fe sub
EIE/SLE
watched a couple of interviews today. EIE. that was surprisingly easy.
his energy so similar to @Baboooshka
That's a comparison I haven'y heard before!
I only liked Kill Bill. Not the greatest Tarantino fan.
“I want the following word: splendor, splendor is fruit in all its succulence, fruit without sadness. I want vast distances. My savage intuition of myself.”
― Clarice Lispector
I'm not a big fan of Tarantino either, I like some characters and some scenes in his movies, it's really epic stuff, but that's about it. too gangsta for my tastes.
btw, in the interview posted by Olimpia, I really thought oh hey, it's Babooosh!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote