Quote Originally Posted by niveK
Quote Originally Posted by Gilligan
Anyone who claims that Socionics descriptions are subject to the Forer Affect has both a simplistic view of socionics and, most likely, a terrible way of implimenting or testing their own system for determining type.
Of course claiming descriptions are subject to the Forer effect would be silly. Descriptions aren't sapient and can't feel that some generic description applies specifically to them. People are subject to the Forer effect. Descriptions may just make use of the Forer effect.

Rick posted a Forer-styled socionic type description on his site once. I wish I could find it again.
You're being retarded and syntactically nit picky. Go shove your head in the sand somewhere else, you retentive virgin.