yes definitely. She has that loose in her clothes and slightly rounded shoulders and stooped posture. YUPOriginally Posted by chocolatte
yes definitely. She has that loose in her clothes and slightly rounded shoulders and stooped posture. YUP
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think she's ESI.
Both EII and ESI are Fi-doms, and I can usually recognize people like this right away. The major difference between EII's and ESI's is that EII's are a bit "darker", because of their intuition. They are more abstract and thoughtful than ESI's. ESI's are secondarily Sensors, not Intuitors, so they are more in the here-and-now, and are more oriented towards what's right in front of them.
I think the woman in the video is not that intuitive. She's mostly talking about what she likes about her environment and not about her future plans.
I also think she's ESI because her clothes are all about showing off her body. An EII would not do that, because an LSE would not respect her or take her to church in those clothes. But an LIE isn't going to church, he's going to some foreign country and he wants to take a babe with him.
Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-26-2020 at 03:36 AM.
NO
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa, show me a picture of you wearing clothes that show your midriff. One picture. Taken any time in your life, other than when you were wearing diapers.
EII's don't do that because they think it makes them look like sluts. Not respectable at all, and you know how LSE's want a partner who is respectable.
I've seen a number of ESI's wearing clothes that showed off a lot of skin.
Here's another video of her:
It has been said that ESI's are artists, and their canvas is themselves. What do you see this girl doing?
She is so ESI that it hurts my eyes.
Last edited by Adam Strange; 09-26-2020 at 03:50 AM.
What is making you uncomfortable? Normally, I refer to all females over the age of 16 or so as women, giving them the benefit of the doubt. But I broke with that practice here because she seems pretty childish to me. Maybe that's just in comparison to the freakishly old women I've been dating, though.
I wasn't intentionally trying to objectify anyone. I was just stating a characteristic of two types that I, myself, have noticed in real life. EII's always look demure and respectable, and ESI's often look like Sharon Tate or Brigette Bardot. Female ESI's are typically more "out there", more noticeable, usually wearing clothes with bright colors and bold flower patterns. It's just a characteristic of the type. And it's not 100% universal all the time, but I'd say it's a definite trend.
And if you don't see your Duals through the lens of how hot they are, or how well they dress themselves, you might not be a Victim type with Si-PoLR.
dress is not type related. It's completely cultural. It's not at all "moral" uniformity across the type.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 09-26-2020 at 02:56 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Sorry, Psych. Maybe I misunderstood and overreacted to your "girl" statement. About two years ago a woman on the forum accused me of having an inappropriate interest in underage females, which is not the case. I'm just trying to avoid a repeat.
Sure, but often cultures are similar. In most of the world dress is associated with sexual availability. Sexual availability isn’t something Deltas tend to like to signal much, with maybe the exception of IEEs, so you can expect Deltas in most of the world to dress more conservatively.
"sex isn't something Delta like to signal much"
You never met an SLI ? lol
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Lol. If they signal that it’s difficult for me to read.
SLI's dress great; very tastefully. And they don't signal anything about sex. If you want to have sex with an SLI, you have to ask her to have sex. She'll either say Yes or No.
In my experience, they will invariably say No unless they are incredibly bored with their life and they see you as a way to add some variety to it. In that case, if you ask straight out, they might say Yes.
There is a reason that IEE's never stop talking about random crazy shit and never give up.
I've watched a bunch of her videos, and she's delta to the core.
as for the darkness-- i know an IRL EII just like her, and from the outside they both exude positivity (positive outlook), but i think it's more of an enneagram type thing. my friend is a 9w1, the girl in the video most likely is too.
Her clothing choice is more of a style than a deliberate method of revealing skin. to my generation it's honestly not scandalous and she can get away with showing more because of her body type.
yup very generational. I look at my daughter's kids clothing now and things have changed a bit from my own.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yep, in average, EII should not dress so provoking, as for example IEI. Fiting to norms is part of caring about emotional comfort (Fi) of people near.
LSE want responsible pair, what is doubtful to say about those who breaks behavior norms or makes too much accent on sexuality (own and of others), by the lesser attention to the personality. Those are not stable and often egocentric in relations, hence it's harder to make good relations with them.
> She is so ESI that it hurts my eyes.
Make a thread with your ESI examples. It's curious to see who you like.
He has ignoring Ti, not Ti lead. He didn’t want to follow the 2 main rules of the underworld and he certainly didn’t go out to enforce those rules, neither. He merely abided by the rules of the criminal underground. Even his usage of regular objects as deadly weapons is a Te thing. He got out of the criminal underworld just so he could marry and have a normal life? HA!! That screams 4D valued Si. The Adjudicator is LSI. “Do not make the mistake of thinking you exist outside the rules. No men do.”
https://youtu.be/x-vOVUTwhcc
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's fine and dandy except everything he does in the movie is Se, and that would be weird for Se ignoring. Si/Te would probably just hire the hit man. Also his usage of everyday objects could also easily be an Se thing, and is probably more Se than Si.
https://youtu.be/ZfqnSmKUVqI
Karl Pilkington is an intensely SLI SLI
The setup for his dynamic with Ricky Gervais who is EIE is basically just Gervais being in awe at how completely different he thinks from himself.
In this clip Karl is being continually prodded into being more enthusiastic and ends up pissed off instead
EIE-Fe Creative 7w8 748 Sx/So VELF
Mike Oh from That Chapter - EII (1w9?) so/sx Normalizing subtype
I have a colleague, older guy with a beard. He is phlegmatic, charming with the ladies, him and his brother, they build entire houses. He does structural calculations for projects here. He is one of those people who likes hiking and camping. In comparison to this guy who I think is SLI I'm less chill and more prone to suddenly shift towards being more aggressive, also I'm more highly mobilized in general and ready to get shit done all the time, whereas he is so damn zen & chill.
LSE drops sick beats
dank af
Obvs Se/Ni valuing introvert, i kind of have those shifts too. Another defining feature of Delta STs is they seem to like to play games where they either have to choose tools or suggest tool choices to others, which I guess is their expression of Te & Si.
My SLI-Si friend could go to sleep at any time of the day. We'd arrive 20 minutes earlier and he's be like "I'm going to take a nap" and minutes later he'd be snoozing in the car while an ILE friend and I would be running around the premises.
filmmaker hal hartley infj
David Miscavige - LSE-Te 3
Kamala Harris - LSE-Si 3w4
Last edited by silke; 10-10-2020 at 10:03 PM.
I lost it, this video was great! I got a chuckle out of it. I love how straightforward he was, yet so calm and critical. I know it was a roast too, but he actually gave him advice in some way.
lol...I thought they were all your age ...not like 80....
My comment was intended to be a joke.
To a 22 yo, a woman who is 35 is definitely over the hill.
George Smiley SLI
https://youtu.be/brxUP2lMVcQ
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kamala as a LSE is an excellent typing. She practically sweats Te. This kind of woman is a dime a dozen in my part of the continent. Something about people "getting it done- well" that rings true for many here.
That reporter is a mega-propagandist though. Have seen her "reporting" which is pure bias opinion. Ugh I feel bad for you americans, just how inundated you are in media and right vs left. Its just weird from the outside. I have typed her (reporter) as a ESE, LII before. She is the female version of Anderson Cooper.
Graham Stephan - SLI-Te with an LII subtype (3w4 sp/so)
Kevin Bridges
Yeah I approve of this. SLI come in all shapes and sizes and some of them are very much "out there".
IEE
Rogers, EII. You know it because throwing a pie towards someone is just unbelievably wrong in terms of comedy...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
See I always saw Mr Rogers as a ESE. He has a kind of caregiving rationalism and careful attitude towards life. I just fail to see how it would work in a dual relationship with a ESTj.
Joel Kinnaman, LSE (gives me e8 vibes)
Thomas Edison, SLI
she is extroverted. focused gaze, very involved in communication, no pauses, imo an EIE.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSF...MLo2U6rSNLpghg
SLI
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
the section will be updated ever other month or so.
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
EII
my ideas about socionics:
https://soziotypen.de/thoughts-on-socionics/
the section will be updated ever other month or so.
this is a VI thread with IEI examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...-(IEI-edition)
and this is a thread with EIE examples
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...s-EIE-examples
LSE and the way he screwed over Tesla is supremely telling for sociotype. Remember how he doubled down on direct-current, investing years and money in a system that was absolute garbage? And then took Tesla's idea's of alternating current and immediately made a buck AND the credit? LSE are often looking for frontier ways of doing something better.Thomas Edison, SLI
When Te combines with Si and is mobilized by Ne you get something like Edison. Its the same reasoning Davinci is often typed as LSE.
ESTj and he is actually worth considering as a Benchmark. He even VI's as one > SLI. Also, he imho is an extroverted type. Very front and centre in his businesses and the public. SLI tend to hang out in the wings more.
Reply With Quote
