Page 55 of 55 FirstFirst ... 5455152535455
Results 2,161 to 2,188 of 2188

Thread: Examples of Deltas

  1. #2161
    C-ESI-Se sx/sp ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,763
    Mentioned
    883 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    There are no "very compelling arguments" with today methods as all those are highly speculative. And there are many mistakes with all methods too, what is see by low typing matches. Besides it's useless to say any arguments to random forum noobs which can't understand them correctly.
    <3 <3 <3 u r my semi-dual i swear it

  2. #2162

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sojourn View Post
    Joel Kinnaman, LSE (gives me e8 vibes)




    I literally had to take off my glasses when I saw this man. Now THAT is fine.

  3. #2163

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asd View Post
    3Te sub does sound intimidating even in theory lol. I usually get 1Ne sub when I test on sociotype.com, and there are aspects of both Fi and Ne sub description that apply and don't apply to me so - I though I am "close enough to the middle" and didn't really look further into subtypes...

    interesting, one of the subtype theories says something like, if intuition is strengthened, then it's both of them and it ultimately takes away from sensation (in keeping with Jung's original theory about how types develop). So that's in line with what you are saying about PoLR yeah...but personally I feel like I have certain instances of being drawn to Ni things, just having a strong intuition that something is a certain way and believing in it, and other things I won't list here. But I have also been brought up in half Gamma NT family so I think that plays a role. I have wondered if Ne sub EII kinda gives NT vibes (which is mentioned in another subtype theory haha). Online I have gotten that a couple of times.

    I thought perhaps I just haven't come across compatible duals but the roughness of weak Fi with LSEs can really rub me the wrong way/scare me sometimes. I thought I was just "sensitive."

    Once I had a crush on an SLI (Si). It wasn't mutual but - I learned that I could trust someone, that it was possible to - like I have never before or even after. He would say the same things to me that I would find invalidating and triggering if it came from quite literally any other person but, from him, I somehow on a visceral level completely trusted him and it was never invalidating to me. The LSEs I meet, in contrast (mostly online) seem to rub me the wrong way. I can also be quite emotional once you do get to know me - it could be E4 or however we want to conceptualize it but - I am not truly stoic. But I am also scared but the potential of an LSE-Si being a little too irrational perhaps. For instance, the SLI-EII description...it mentions basically the SLI gets tired of the Fi and literally just starts tuning EII out, going on breaks by himself, and hurting her. Establishing psychological distance in that way.

    I do not want someone who is bored by Fi, because Fi and seeking closeness - the closer the better - makes me happy and also fuels my sx so they are intertwined. I also cannot be with someone who kind of just...expects me to be random and funny much of the time. I can be quite serious honestly - my Ne more so manifests in theorizing (for which I get labeled NT lol).

    edit: I wanted to explain this better. Fi HAs can get scared off by Fi, by my seeking closeness. But it doesn't mean it has to be literally 24/7. I just want someone I feel close to/one with even when I am not talking to him. And that when we do speak, the sense of closeness brings joy not strain or burden. .

    But yeah that thing you said about LSE-Si using Se behind the scenes - I absolutely love it. That's how I imagine my potential SO. To be fair, even LSE-Tes tend to get softer around me - or likely will at least in person but - I feel so much more comfortable and myself with someone who uses Se behind the scenes as needed in a protective manner. I think the Te+Se thing I mentioned is sort of classic "Type A" personality with aggression and ambition combined which can tend to be a bit too much for me. I liked my SLI friend's Fi which was just enough to understand the level of gentleness I required and he in response treated me with care.

    Regarding giving LSE-Te Fi help, I am not entirely sure what it looks like? So I do not know how much Fi help they would require. I guess I imagine LSEs as someone who do generally have quite good integrity themselves; they may just push it to the background a bit when over-concerned with a Te matter in the present. But mostly I imagine Fi "help" as helping them figure out their thoughts/feelings/attitudes and bring it to the consciousness (and the rest follows - including ethical behavior). Although I really don't mind giving them pointers on that, but like I said, if the Fi is too rough, it tends to scare me.

    was? Did you guys end up not being compatible, if you don't mind me asking?
    I’m a 1Ne sub, an ennea4 and an sx-lead too!!

    It’s like I’m reading my own mind. I don’t get the opportunity to talk to other EIIs a lot so I’m just fangirling right now

    I had a crush on an SLI-Si friend with whom it wasn’t reciprocal either. I also had an SLI-Si childhood best friend with whom I experienced that feeling of, man they just get it. We called each other kindred spirits, and I still think that holds true. But SLIs of the Si subtype do seem to get stifled by our Fi after a while. I’ve had people tell me that even when I try not to emphasize it, they can feel it lingering in the background. It’s a pity because otherwise it’s such a harmonious relation!

    Yes, for real. I can quickly tell when there’s an LSE-Si around me just because the psychological atmosphere instantly settles, like a storm just suddenly clearing into a blue sky when you get into their presence. And I second what you said about LSE-Tes softening around us - after detailing my tumultuous dynamic with my uncle, I must admit even he is sometimes touched by my Fi. It can be really endearing.

    With my LSE-Te romance, it was a sexuality issue...we had feelings for each other but he was in the closet before I came into the picture and did not want to commit to a woman. We shared passions and talents we’d never shared with others and we were always better together than apart. To me, he was my soulmate. But he started to take advantage of my loyalty to him in spite of knowing his situation, and I couldn’t continue. It was when we were over that he realized what my presence meant for him (duality-wise), but...it is what it is. He did teach me how beautiful duality can be, though.

  4. #2164
    tuathe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    meh
    TIM
    EII-Fi
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    There are no "very compelling arguments" with today methods as all those are highly speculative. And there are many mistakes with all methods too, what is see by low typing matches.
    Besides it's useless to say any arguments to random forum noobs which can't understand them correctly. And intuitive methods as VI are widely used, have significant weight in opinions to make logical explanations weaker without VI factor and are not supposed to have arguments at all, what noobs may forget.
    So, in general to ask for arguments about someone types is significantly useless. I understand, that noobs like to play in argumentations. But it's not very serious except cases to reject some types, alike to point that to have base Fi type does not match with your rude talking style. But not about whole type.
    Are you calling competency basing typings on arbitrary stuff like one's facial features they have no control over, instead of taking a look at their actual personality? Wow, I haven't seen someone spew so much bullshit in one post in a loooong time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    No one will give good arguments. At least, for the ones with some competence in typology. Noobs are not so, they may be convinced by any nonsense and can't often understand correctly even own types, alike in your case.
    Said the guy who after being into this typology for 10 years still makes rookie mistakes and types himself LSE when it's blatantly obvious to anyone watching is not the case. Besides, the only reason you have for accusing me of mistyping myself is because I told you off when you tried to convince me I must be something else but not an EII because I wasn't your dreamy INFP girl. You're ridiculous, as always.
    EII-Fi
    2w3 sx/so
    tritype: 2-6-9


  5. #2165
    tuathe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    meh
    TIM
    EII-Fi
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PinKDiGiT18 View Post
    Observation - the stronger the base subtype, the more that person actively implements their demonstrative in their activities. My hypothesis about it is that their HA and their PoLR are more developed (connected respectively to the Ignoring and Base), so they have a bit more “give” when pressured and expect the same from their duals. So Te-LSEs are using Se more conspicuously with less Si “cushioning” because they are oriented at Fi-EIIs, who can “take it.” Si-LSEs use it more often, but behind the scenes of Si so as to not hurt Ne-EII’s PoLR
    Funny, given the Cautious vs Bold dichotomy, I'd expect EII-Ne to have stronger Se and being able to "take it" as opposed to EII-Fi. It also seems way more logical that way. If I were to believe what you believe instead, I'd have to type myself EII-Ne like you do, which I know I'm not.
    Last edited by tuathe; 05-04-2021 at 11:39 AM.
    EII-Fi
    2w3 sx/so
    tritype: 2-6-9


  6. #2166

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,047
    Mentioned
    1199 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    @PinKDiGiT18

    Taking the problem of high speculativity (including of the process as with VI) of existing typing methods, if you want to play in arguments about types - offer your opponent to explain his opinion or doubts. With some thinking it will be not hard to see and to point weak places of his arguments.

    It's easier to reduce a possiblity of some types. But it's doubtful to explain a whole type by arguments with good objectivity.
    What is possibly now is to use matched results of independent methods and opinion sources as objective approach. If more tests and typers agree (independently!) - it's more possible trait/type from objective point.

    I suppose Ti valued types have higher interest and trust to speculative games with behavior arguments possible today, as Te valued ones should notice better the lack of objectivity. It's also easier to logically convince F types, though they are easier to change later such opinions.

    Also, there is significant chance of your mistake with today methods. It's more when you don't have good typing experience. When know not much about a human, what exists for the ones you do not know good personally and who did not do special typing questionnaires/tests.
    For types about famouses and public people you are doomed to have bad arguments due to lack of info - it's impossibly to type them with assurance by common behavior only. It's appropriate with intuitive VI which has no arguments to say to other human.

    P.S.
    To identify types of famouses are needed good VI skills, what noobs have no. You just play here in a typing, same as in arguments.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  7. #2167

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuathe View Post
    Funny, given the Cautious vs Bold dichotomy, I'd expect EII-Ne to have stronger Se and being able to "take it" as opposed to EII-Fi. It also seems way more logical that way. If I were to believe what you believe instead, I'd have to type myself EII-Ne like you do, which I know I'm not.
    I don’t know, would it make sense for EII-Ne to have a dual of a sensory subtype if their sensory functions, including PoLR, were stronger? What I do see is that for creative subtypes, the PoLR is more conscious along with the creative - part of the reason it is very painful. The following statement is a conjecture, but it seems that because base subs are better able to focus on functions of the same orientation as their base (introverted in our case), the concept of a stronger PoLR (which in our case is extroverted) may be overlooked. But in my experience, the Fi-subtype is much more resilient when faced with pressure than the Ne-sub. Especially when the pressure is given in light of a Te aim. We Ne-subs are more likely to have a conniption fit when someone pressures us for any reason, even if for Te purposes. The presence of Si gentleness and nuance is non-negotiable for us.

    To me, you are definitely EII-Fi - from the first time you quoted me your interjections and semantics have been very reflective of rational-subtype rational Delta dyad.

  8. #2168

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by asd View Post
    you've probably seen this but: http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?t...d_and_Ovcharov

    what you've been saying is in this article

    @PinKDiGiT18
    Thank you so much! I think I came across it before but it’s been a while and my baby Te never knows how to find stuff again. -facepalm-

    It’s fascinating how our minds work. A lot of people are skeptical about socionics but it is such an awesome tool.

  9. #2169
    tuathe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    meh
    TIM
    EII-Fi
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PinKDiGiT18 View Post
    To me, you are definitely EII-Fi - from the first time you quoted me your interjections and semantics have been very reflective of rational-subtype rational Delta dyad.
    Glad you see it as well But just like Ne-subs you describe, I'm also allergic to any form of pressure.
    EII-Fi
    2w3 sx/so
    tritype: 2-6-9


  10. #2170
    myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  11. #2171
    sojourn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    KR
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    48
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


    John Grisham, LSE


    American writer, politician, lawyer, activist








    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    His extended talk with Stephen King (my money is on SLE for him)
    looks like quasi-identical dialogue in front of a live audience.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Skip ahead to the 12:00 mark to hear them talk.


  12. #2172

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PinKDiGiT18 View Post
    I’ve been unduly obsessed with Astrid Bergés-Frisbey forever, and I am convinced she is LSE-Si.

    Attachment 16805
    Revisiting my typing of this actress - found her listed as IEE-Fi in a gallery. If this is her correct typing, I had the Delta extrovert + introverted subtype part going. Some of her style of speaking and facial expressions do remind me of an IEE-Fi I knew.

    She does demonstrate a certain diffidence that doesn't seem characteristic of a sensory type. I am thinking Sam Claflin, whom she acted with in Pirates of the Caribbean, may be SLI-Si.

  13. #2173
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    25,517
    Mentioned
    639 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tuathe View Post
    Are you calling competency basing typings on arbitrary stuff like one's facial features they have no control over, instead of taking a look at their actual personality? Wow, I haven't seen someone spew so much bullshit in one post in a loooong time.


    Said the guy who after being into this typology for 10 years still makes rookie mistakes and types himself LSE when it's blatantly obvious to anyone watching is not the case. Besides, the only reason you have for accusing me of mistyping myself is because I told you off when you tried to convince me I must be something else but not an EII because I wasn't your dreamy INFP girl. You're ridiculous, as always.
    Don’t argue with sol
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
    Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  14. #2174
    Karbonkel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    The Netherlands
    TIM
    EII-Ne So/Sx 479
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  15. #2175
    haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


    delta ST


  16. #2176

    Default



    <3
    ''So sanity is acceptance of the appearance and at the same time awareness that what we think we have to accept is never really how things are.''

  17. #2177
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    10,928
    Mentioned
    1119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kalinoche buenanoche View Post


    <3

    ESE, all day long.

  18. #2178
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    10,928
    Mentioned
    1119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    ESE, all day long.
    "I'm not really gay, I'm an attention-whore with Principles, dammit, and how dare you accuse me of being gay just because I dress like a woman? I'm fighting the good fight for the rights of all cross-dressers to be accepted for who they are.
    Plus, of course, I'm getting loads of attention."

  19. #2179
    Karbonkel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    The Netherlands
    TIM
    EII-Ne So/Sx 479
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Benjamin Frew, IEE-Ne

  20. #2180
    Karbonkel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    The Netherlands
    TIM
    EII-Ne So/Sx 479
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Mat Watson, IEE-Ne

  21. #2181
    Karbonkel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    The Netherlands
    TIM
    EII-Ne So/Sx 479
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    Tiësto, LSE-Si, harmonizing

  22. #2182

    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    EII-1Ne 4w5 sx/so
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I feel like Ed Sheeran is EII. He has an Ne ego face. His music is often metaphorical, but also gentle, which makes me think Si-valuing > Se-valuing. Introvert with 4D Fi.

  23. #2183
    Karbonkel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    The Netherlands
    TIM
    EII-Ne So/Sx 479
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hes probably SEI

  24. #2184

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    11,887
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I feel like Ed Sheeran is EII.


    I never liked Ed Sheeran much so works for me. I always wondered why i didn't like him. It didn't seem like directly he was an asshole, but how he's constantly smiling maybe seemed jerk-ish and sociopathic or so nice it was actually mean sort of thing. I would agree Deltas are closest to God but God is also cruel and wrathful and vindictive and hateful as much as he is kind and loving and generous and all of that. Hail Satan bro.

  25. #2185
    Looking for the gold mine one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Home
    TIM
    ILI-Ni
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BandD View Post

    I never liked Ed Sheeran much so works for me. I always wondered why i didn't like him. It didn't seem like directly he was an asshole, but how he's constantly smiling maybe seemed jerk-ish and sociopathic or so nice it was actually mean sort of thing. I would agree Deltas are closest to God but God is also cruel and wrathful and vindictive and hateful as much as he is kind and loving and generous and all of that. Hail Satan bro.
    Why do you make me laugh so much with your posts lol
    R

  26. #2186
    scientist donkey BrightDemonSheep96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    On a toilet, right above you
    TIM
    ILE-H LEVF/omnibeta
    Posts
    6,575
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Cinema Therapy (therapist: IEE [-N stereotype])
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  27. #2187
    Milo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    400
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENFp in medical profession

  28. #2188
    Milo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    400
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EII-Ne

Page 55 of 55 FirstFirst ... 5455152535455

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •