Kierkegaard's work, I think many would agree, must properly be comprehended in relation to hegelianism. There is a great book by Jon Stewart, "Kierkegaard's relation to Hegel reconsidered," which provides factual evidence to refute the presupposition Kierkegaard was directly refuting Hegel himself, but was more generally opposed to the hegelianism of Denmark at the time. In any case, Kierkegaard certainly seems to me to be opposed to Ti with his statement that truth is subjectivity for the following reasoning: Kierkegaard's entire existentialism is exploring possible ways of living in which the self is in harmony practically, existentially; for this reason, myself and my philosophy professor friends like to read Kierkegaard as directly complimentary to William James. Is pragmatism not emphasizing Te? I sincerely do not know as I have not spent any attention on socionics theory for years literally, so I have forgotten, but it seems plausible. Also, Hegel's thought is cited correctly I believe as qualified as the culmination of the dialectic form of cognition. He is cited as EIE or ILI; to me, is he not - consistent with his logic - a type of both-and, perhaps also IEI-ish as strnng seemed to include in his beta nf suggestion of his type?